Comparison of GPU-accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulation Efficiency for the Acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X Complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER

Bonifacius Ivan Wiranata(1), Enade Perdana Istyastono(2*),

(1) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sanata Dharma
(2) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sanata Dharma
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Molecular dynamics simulations are a valuable tool in identifying potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease therapy. Recent advancements in hardware and software, particularly the implementation of graphics processing units (GPUs), have significantly improved the efficiency of MD simulations. This study aims to compare GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER. The complex was obtained from Protein Data bank with code 1E66 and was prepared with same conditions. MD simulations were performed for 50 ns with three replicates per software. GROMACS exhibited the shortest average simulation duration (45,104 seconds), followed by AMBER (48,884 seconds) and YASARA (649,208 seconds). RMSD analysis of protein backbone and ligand movement indicated stable simulations across all platforms. Interaction analysis at 25 ns and 35 ns of YASARA’s run revealed that Huprine X maintained key aromatic interactions within the AChE binding pocket, despite undergoing a 180° rotation. YASARA proved more efficient in MD preparation and produced more precise results, while GROMACS was most efficient in simulation runtime. The study highlights the trade-offs between ease of use, simulation speed, and result consistency among these software packages for AChE-HUX MD simulations.

Keywords


acetylcholinesterase; GPU; molecular dynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, M., Alekseenko, A., Bergh, C., Blau, C., Briand, E., Doijade, M., Fleischmann, S., Gapsys, V., Garg, G., Gorelov, S., Gouaillardet, G., Gray, A., Irrgang, M.E., Jalalypour, F., Jordan, J., Junghans, C., Kanduri, P., Keller, S., Kutzner, C., Lemkul, J.A., Lundborg, M., Merz, P., Miletić, V., Morozov, D., Páll, S., Schulz, R., Shirts, M., Shvetsov, A., Soproni, B., Spoel, D. van der, Turner, P., Uphoff, C., Villa, A., Wingbermühle, S., Zhmurov, A., Bauer, P., Hess, B., Lindahl, E., 2023. GROMACS 2023 Manual. Zenodo.

El Khatabi, K., El-Mernissi, R., Aanouz, I., Ajana, M.A., Lakhlifi, T., Khan, A., Wei, D.-Q., Bouachrine, M., 2021. Identification of novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors through 3D-QSAR, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation targeting Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 27(10), 302.

Götz, A.W., Williamson, M.J., Xu, D., Poole, D., Le Grand, S., Walker, R.C., 2012. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. generalized born. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 8(5), 1542–1555.

GPU accelerated molecular dynamics [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://www.yasara.org/gpu.htm (accessed 4.14.24).

Hollingsworth, S.A., Dror, R.O., 2018. Molecular Dynamics Simulation for All. Neuron, 99(6), 1129–1143.

Liu, K., Watanabe, E., Kokubo, H., 2017. Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 31(2), 201–211.

Loukatou, S., Papageorgiou, L., Fakourelis, P., Filntisi, A., Polychronidou, E., Bassis, I., Megalooikonomou, V., Vlachakis, D., Kossida, S., Group, M., Faculty, I., 2014. Molecular dynamics simulations through GPU video games technologies 3(2), 64–71.

Machado, M.R., Pantano, S., 2020. Split the Charge Difference in Two! A Rule of Thumb for Adding Proper Amounts of Ions in MD Simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 16(3), 1367–1372.

Marucci, G., Buccioni, M., Ben, D.D., Lambertucci, C., Volpini, R., Amenta, F., 2021. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology, 190, 108352.

Prasasty, V.D., Istyastono, E.P., 2020. Structure-based design and molecular dynamics simulations of pentapeptide aeytr as a potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20(4), 953–959.

Rapaport, D.C., 2022. GPU molecular dynamics: Algorithms and performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2241(1).

Wira Waskitha, S.S., Istyastono, E.P., Octa Riswanto, F.D., 2023. Molecular Docking Study of Caffeic Acid as Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor. Journal of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(3), 867–873.

Xu, Y., Cheng, S., Sussman, J.L., Silman, I., Jiang, H., 2017. Computational studies on acetylcholinesterases. Molecules, 22(8).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/jpsc.009061

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Farmasi Sains dan Komunitas (Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Community)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Jurnal Farmasi Sains dan Komunitas (Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Community)

Published by Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.