STUDENT-WRITERS CLAIMS IN HORTATORY ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS: AN APPRAISAL STUDY IN CONVENIENCE WRITING
(1) Padjadjaran University
(2) Padjadjaran University
(3) Padjadjaran University
(4) Padjadjaran University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anonymous. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. (2nd ed). London: Continuum.
Coffin, C. (2004). Arguing about how the world is or how the world should be: The role of arguments in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3) ,229246.Available[Online]:http://oro.open.ac.uk/378/1/EAPJ_for_respository.pdf. Accessed on June 25th, 2016.
Eggins, S. (2005). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. (2nd ed). London: Continuum.
Halliday, M.,A.,K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Ho, V.L. (2011). Non-native Argumentative Writing By Vietnamese Learner of English: A Contrastive Study. P.hD Thesis: Washington, DC.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd ed). London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 6678.Online[Available]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249768757_A_Genre_Description_of_the_Argumentative_Essay.Accessed on May, 11th 2015.
Jalilifar, A. & Hemmati, A. (2013). Construction of evaluative meanings by Kurdish-speaking learners of English: A comparison of high-and low-graded argumentative essays. Issues in Language Teaching, 2(2), P.57-84.
Jacobs, H., Zingraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V.F., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. MA : Newbury House Publisher.
Lee, S.H. (2008). Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays. Prospect, 23(3), pp 43-58.
Liu, X.(2013). Evaluation in Chinese University EFL students English argumentative writing: An APPRAISAL study Online[Available]http: // www.reading.ac.uk. Acessed on November , 7th2016.
Martin, J.R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. (1st ed). London: Continuum.
Martin, J.R.,& White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v21i2.938
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...
Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.