Students Critical Thinking Skills in a Classroom Debate

Reli Handayani(1*),

(1) University of Jambi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Mastering argumentative discourse both in written and oral is a must for students nowadays. However, a successful argumentative discourse requires high thinking order skill such as developing a stance, analyzing arguments, distinguishing facts and opinions, solving problems, comparing and contrasting material, and making inferences. Realizing the importance roles of critical thinking in constructing argumentative discourse, this study focuses on students performance in debate specifically argument, counter-argument, and rebuttals. They are chosen since they are always taken into consideration in assessing students debate performance.

Keywords


critical thinking, assessment, debate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Coogan, J. and Pawson, C. (2006) Widening Participation and Debate in Psychology, Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference, 27 29 June, York St John University College, York.

Eggen, P and Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategies and Models for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. USA: Pearson Education, inc.

Freely, A. J. (2009). Argumentative and Debate. California: Wadsworth Co.

Halonen, J.S. and Gray, C. (2001). Critical Thinking Companion: For Introductory Psychology, Worth Publishers Inc

Huber R and Snider A.C. Influencing through Argument. Updated ed. New York: International Debate Education Association; 2006

Johnson, E. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna, (Indonesian translation). Bandung: MLC.

Latif, M.A. (2011). A Comprehensive Guide to Debate Adjudication. Retrieved August 2nd 2016, from http://www.debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php.

NEIU. (2008). Northeastern Illinois University General Education Critical Thinking Rubric. Retrieved August 2nd 2016, from http://www.neiu.edu/~neassess/gened.htm#rubric

Nisbett, R. E. (2003) The Geography of Thought. The Free Press.

Peirce, W. (2006). Designing Rubric for Assessing Higher Order Thinking. Retrieved August 2nd, 2016, from http://www.academic.pg.cc.md.us/~wpeirce.html

Snider A, Schnure M. (2006). Many Sides: Debate Across the Curriculum. New York: International Debate Education Association.

Tumposky, N. (2004). The Debate Debate. The Clearing House, 78: 42-55.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v19i2.307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Reli Handayani



Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.