Analysis of The Wife of Bath’s Tale from Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales through the Lense of Propp’s Narrative Function
(1) Gordon College, Olongapo City
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examines Geoffrey Chaucer's The Wife of Bath's Tale through Vladimir Propp's narrative functions as a means of understanding how Chaucer follows and subverts traditional structures of folktales. The Canterbury Tales is one of the most important works in medieval literature, while The Wife of Bath's Tale is especially famous for its complex depiction of gender relations, power, and moral teaching. The purpose of the investigation is to explain the structural elements of the tale using Propp's 31 narrative functions applied to folk stories. In mapping these functions onto the tale, the research underlines how Chaucer follows conventional patterns of storytelling but innovates in crucial areas, mainly when it comes to gender roles and moral redemption. This study used a structuralist approach which examines exactly how this knightly quest of redemption was non-traditional in that his intellectual and moral growth was pitted against the more physical challenges of traditional narratives. The results of the analysis are that 18 of Propp's functions are represented, whereas several of the most important functions—struggle and victory among them—are negated. Through this, Chaucer attacks the gendered prescription of medieval society and, through the figures of the queen and the old woman, develops firm arguments for female self-determination. The study concluded that Chaucer draws upon Propp's narrative structure in his resistance to and rearticulation of socially held attitudes regarding gender, power, and heroism—to develop the tale into a progressivist critique against traditional medieval values.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barry, P. (2018). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory (Fourth edition. First Indian edition.). Vinod Vasishtha for Viva Books Private Limited. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526153524
Brooks, J. (2019). Narrative Structure in Medieval Literature. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559671
Burke, D. (2018). Gender and class in chaucer: The wife of bath’s self-serving appropriation of masculinity 2018. Master’s Theses. https://digitalcommons.cortland.edu/theses/42
Chaucer, G. (2003). The canterbury tales. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-canterbury-tales-9780199599028
Cooper, H. (2004). Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/oxford-guides-to-chaucer-the-canterbury-tales-9780198878780
Cooper, H. (2021). Chaucer and Feminist Theory: Rethinking Gender in the Middle Ages. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-women-and-gender-in-medieval-europe-9780199582174
Dinshaw, C. (1989). Chaucer’s sexual poetics. University of Wisconsin Press.
Dinshaw, C. (2021). Chaucer’s Queer Poetics: Gender and Desire in the Canterbury Tales. University of Chicago Press.
Eagleton, T. (2011). Literary theory: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Fein, S. (2022). Gender, Power, and the Dynamics of The Wife of Bath’s Tale. Medieval Literature Quarterly, 45(2), 123-136.
Grudin, M. (2021). Chaucer’s Use of Folktale Structure in The Canterbury Tales. Journal of Medieval Studies, 33(1), 45-61.
Hansen, E. (2019). Women and Authority in Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. Feminist Medieval Studies Journal, 10(3), 67-82.
Jordan, R. M. (2006). The Feminist Dilemma of the Wife of Bath’s Tale. Medieval Feminist Forum: A Journal of Gender and Sexuality, 41(1), 34-46.
Laskaya, A. (1995). Chaucer’s approach to gender in the Canterbury Tales (1. publ). Brewer, 12(3), 23-35.
Mann, J. (2002). Feminizing Chaucer. D.S. Brewer. https://boydellandbrewer.com/
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Propp, V. J., Wagner, L. A., & Dundes, A. (2013). Morphology of the folktale (2. ed., rev.22. pbk. print). Univ. of Texas Press.
Rigby, S. H. (Stephen H. (2000). The wife of bath, christine de pizan, and the medieval case for women. The Chaucer Review, 35(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/cr.2000.0024
Saler, L., & Tapper, E. (2020). Propp Revisited: Narrative Functions in Modern and Medieval Literature. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/
Wood, C. (1999). Gender and Power in Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. English Literary History, 66(4), 799-822.
Wood, T. (2021). Power and Morality in Medieval Literature: A Reassessment of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. English Literary History, 89(1), 67-89.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v25i1.9930
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
JOLL is indexed in:

This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License












