Revisiting Feminist Strategies in Poetry: Gender, Genre, and Power Relation

A.B. Sri Mulyani

Abstract


The patriarchal gender division of private-public dichotomy assigned to particular gender for different roles and sphere is generally viewed as an “ancient” practice in the West. However, this “ancient” gender conception that can be traced from its Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian roots can frequently be pertinently visible in modern Western world as exemplified in the notion of “Woman’s place” and; it becomes the dominant gender discourse. Consequently, this discourse continually creates hierarchical and unequal power relation that marginalizes women in accessing education and their full participation in public spheres. This limited accessibility to education (including language and literacy) also shapes the roles and status of women as writers in Western critical and literary tradition.  Writing as a profession is traditionally men’s domain; therefore, the production and contribution of women writers have less privilege and space in the Western canon. Women writers from time to time have to struggle to reclaim their rights and place in it. This research attempts to re-examine how this (re)production of the binary opposition of private-public sphere operates in language and literature of the Western critical literary tradition by scrutinizing the selected poems by the selected women writers in this research. Furthermore, this research also studies and locates how women writers employ particular strategies in gendering and degendering their writings as both aesthetic and ideological expressions. In conclusion, this research argues that women writings are not “deficient” and “inferior” to their male counterpart; and instead their status and difference as writers are the result of patriarchal dominance and power relation that historically have subordinated and denied them equal public access to education, language, literacy, and literary production.


Keywords


pprivate-public spheres; poetry; women writers; ideologies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Batey. Kristine. “Lot’s Wife.”

Cameron, Deborah, ed. (1990). The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.

Chambers, Deborah. (2001). Representing the Family. London: Sage Publications.

de Beauvoir, Simone. (1953). The Second Sex. Le Deuxieme Sexe translated by H.M. Parshley, London: Jonathan Cape.

Elshtain, Jean Bethke, ed. (1982). The Family in Political Thought. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.

Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gilbert, Sandra, and Susan Gubar. (1979). “Infection in the Sentence: The Woman Writer and the Anxiety of Authorship.” Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. Ed. Robyn Warhol and Diane Herndl. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Hartmann, H. (1981). “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union” in Sargent, L. ed. Women and Revolution. London: Pluto.

Huyssen, Andreas. (1993). “Mass Culture As Woman: Modernism’s Other,” 1986.

Kaplan, Cora. (1978). Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Aurora Leigh, and Other Poems, introduced by Cora Kaplan, London: Women’s Press.

Kaplan, Cora. (1990). “Language and Gender” in Deborah Cameron, ed. By. The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.

Krontiris, Tina. (1997). Oppositional Voices: Women As Writers and Translators of Literature in the English Renaissance. London: Routledge.

Lanser, Susan S. (1997). “Toward a Feminist Narratology”. Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. Ed. Robyn Warhol and Diane Herndl. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, .

---. (1992). Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Lanyer, Aemilia. (1994). “Eve’s Apology in the Defense of Women” in Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum.

Millay, Edna St. Vincent. (1991). “An Ancient Gesture” in Selected Poems: Edna St. Vincent Millay.

Mills, Sara. (2005). Discourse. London: Routledge.

Mills, Sara, et.al., eds. (1989). Feminist Readings/Feminists Reading. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Parker, Dorothy. “Penelope.”

Rich, Adrienne. (1975). Poetry: Poems selected and New, 1850 – 1974, New York: Norton

Rich, Adrienne. (1986). Blood, Bread and Poetry. New York: Norton.

Schaum, Melita and Connie Flanagan, eds. (1998). Gender Images: Readings for Composition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle, trans. W. Godzich.

Warhol, Robyn, and Diane Herndl, eds. (1997). Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Woolf, Virginia. (1929 and 1966). “Women and Fiction” in Collected Essays. Vol. 2.

Woolf, Virginia. (2012). “Professions for Women” in The Death of the Moth and Other Essays. Project Gutenburg Australia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i1.4021

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1747 times
PDF view: 846 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by  Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.

JOLL is indexed in:

       


This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats