Email this article 
USING ONLINE PEER REVIEW AS A STRATEGY TO IMPROVE WRITING SKILLS
Abstract
This research investigated the use of online peer review as a strategy to improve writing skills in the revision process. This qualitative study will recruit two peers of a private university in Malang based on two criteria 1) they have passed an academic writing course with an excellent score, and 2) they were students who use online media to conduct peer reviews. Using a semi-structured interview, the students were asked what types of online resources they use for online peer review, and how they do peer review online. The interview data will be analyzed using content analysis to triangulate the data, investigator triangulation will be performed by involving two data analysts. The result of the study was students used WhatsApp and Zoom media to conduct online peer review, and students provide their writing in the form of an online file to the peer for review about grammar, writing effectiveness, and diction errors with several platforms, such as grammar checkers and online dictionaries to assist the revision process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Althauser, R., & Darnall, K. (2001). Enhancing Critical reading and writing through peer reviews: An exploration of assisted performance. Teaching Sociology, 29(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318780
Anderson, P., Anson, C. M., Gonyea, R. M., & Paine, C. (n.d.). The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 199-235.
Aull, L. (2020). Student-centered assessment and online writing feedback: Technology in a time of crisis. Assessing Writing, 46, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100483
Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794
Bean, J. C. (n.d.). Engaging Ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2nd ed.). 2.
Carter, R. (1995). Keywords in language and literacy. Routledge.
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
Herrington, A. J., & Cadman, D. (1991). Peer review and revising in an anthropology course: Lessons for learning. College Composition and Communication, 42(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.2307/358198
Hughes, M. D., Regan, K. S., & Evmenova, A. (2019). A computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies to support student writing. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219833026
Jensen, W., & Fischer, B. (2005). Teaching technical writing through student peer-evaluation. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.2190/MBYG-AK7L-5CT7-54DU
Jönsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Klimova, B. F. (2010). Formal written English revisited. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.024
Klimova, B. F. (2012). The teaching of foreign languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.042
Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50(3), 643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128929
Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2012). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing - READ WRIT, 25, 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5
Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. 14.
Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229–235.
Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018). Two strategies for qualitative content analysis: An intramethod approach to triangulation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(5), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586
Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating text quality: The continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.44536
Şen, N. S., & Şimşek, A. (n.d.). An analysis of Turkish students’ written errors: A case of an EFL context. 4(1), 11.
Brown, H. D. (n.d.). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th Ed.). Pearson Education.
Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2012). Thai EFL students’ writing errors in different text types: The interference of the first language. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p67
Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017). University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0076-8
Zuhairi, A., & Umamah, A. (2016). The Indonesian junior high school students’ strategies in learning writing skill. Arab World English Journal, 7(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no3.27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v6i2.3560
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 991 timesPDF view: 515 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIET DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet
p-ISSN: 2548-8422 (since 5 January 2017); e-ISSN: 2548-8430 (since 5 January 2017)
IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) is published by the Institute for Research and Community Services of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.