Email this article 
TRAINING EVALUATION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS OF 3T REGIONS OF MAHAKAM ULU REGENCY BY USING KIRKPATRICK
Abstract
This study aims to determine the success of training for elementary school teachers in Mahakam Ulu Regency, North Kalimantan in 2016 and 2017. The evaluation method used is the evaluation method proposed by Kirkpatrick. In this study, two of the four levels were investigated. The study method used is the Kirkpatrik evaluation model level one and two. At level one, participants conduct evaluations related to satisfaction and level two participants evaluate learning. At level one, participants are asked to fill in satisfaction instruments. The results of the satisfaction instrument entry were analyzed using weighting on each of the satisfaction dimensions. At level two, participants are asked to work on the pre-test and post-test instruments. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Test. The results showed that the level of participant satisfaction for first level was 83.848% for 2015 and 83,178% for 2016. Both scores showed positive reactions to the training. For For second level, learning, the average increase in knowledge was 10.984 for 2015 and 9.4 for 2016. The increase in the mean score was significantly based on the Wilcoxon test.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad. (2021, April 5). yahoo.com. Retrieved from gramedia.com: https://www.gramedia.com/best-seller/meningkatkan-kecerdasan-otak/
Aminah, H. (2015). Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick dan Aplikasinya dalam Pelaksanaan Pelatihan (Level Reaksi dan Pembelajaran) di Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Perum Jakarta. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, Vol. 6(No. 1), 376 - 384.
Anh, V. T. (2018). Evaluation Models in Educational Program: Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol. 34(No. 2), 140 - 150. doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4252
Buttram, J. L., & Covert, R. W. (1969). The Discrepancy Evaluation Model: A Systematic Approach for the Evaluation of Career Planning and Placement Programs. ERIC.
Dosen, U.-U. G. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2005 Nomor 157.
Kholik, A. (2020). Model Kirkpatrick dalam Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Penguatan Kepala Sekolah. Jurnal Sipatokkong BPSDM Sulawesi Selatan, Volume 1(Nomor 3), 219 - 226. Retrieved from https://ojs.bpsdmsulsel.id
Khongpit, V., Sintanakul, K., & Nomphonkrang, T. (2018, June). The VARK Learning Style of the University Student in Computer Course. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, Vol. 4(No. 2), 102 - 106.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher.
Kirkpatrick, J., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2009). The Kirkpatrick Four Level TM: A Fresh Look After 50 Years 1959 - 2009. Kirkpatrick Partners, LLC.
Muryadi, A. D. (2017, Januari). Model Evaluasi Program dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas, Vol. 3(No. 1), 1 - 16.
Nirmala, S. A., Nurparidah, R., & Nopiantin, R. (2015, Juni). Perbedaan Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan Mahasiswa dalam Penanganan Kegawatdaruratan Maternal antara Kurikulum Konvensional dan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. IJEMIC, Volume 2(No. 2), 19 - 25.
Nuraini. (2017, Januari - Juni). Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick (Level 1 dan 2) Diklat Teknis Substatif Pemina Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Keagamaan pada SMP di Pusdiklat Tenaga Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan. Andragogi Jurnal Diklat Teknis, Volume V(No. 1), 34 - 53.
Nurjanah, A. (2018, Januari - April). Pengukuran Keberhasilan DIklat melalui Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick. Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, Volume XII(Nomor 32), 71 - 82.
Pahlevi, I. (2019). Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bagian II Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI (p. iii). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI.
Provus, M. M. (1969). The Discrepancy Evaluation Model: An Approach to Local Program Improvement and Development. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: The Board of Public Education.
Ramadhon, S. (2019). Penerapan Model Empat Level Kirkpatrick dalam Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Aparatur di Pusdiklat Migas. Forum DIklat, Vol. 6(No. 1), 43 - 54.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accuntability. Annual Meeting of the Americanj Association of School Administrators, (pp. 1 - 30). Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, & L. A. Wingate, International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31 - 62). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publications.
Topna, H. (2012, Sep - Oct). Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of Various Models. Journal of Business and Managemen (IOSR-JBM), Volume 5(Issue 2), 16 - 22. Retrieved from www.iosrjournal.org
Utomo, A. P., & Tehupeiory, K. P. (2014). Evaluasi Pelatihan dengan Metode Kirkpatrick Analysis. Jurnal Telematika, Vol. 9 (No. 2), 37 - 41.
Widharyanato, B. (2017). Gaya Belajar Model VARK dan Implementasinya di Dalam Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa. 1st International Conference on Education, Language, and Arts (pp. 1 - 16). Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Retrieved from http://u.lipi.go.id/1493924774
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v5i2.3540
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1731 timesPDF view: 1135 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIET DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet
p-ISSN: 2548-8422 (since 5 January 2017); e-ISSN: 2548-8430 (since 5 January 2017)
IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) is published by the Institute for Research and Community Services of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.