SCRUTINIZING PAPUAN EFL STUDENTS’ STRATEGIES FOR ENRICHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY MASTERY

Abel Yohanis Romrome

Abstract


The current study aimed to scrutinize the approaches employed by Papuan EFL students to improve their vocabulary skills. The study utilized a mixed methods approach, incorporating both a questionnaire and interviews to gather data from 30 Papuan EFL students enrolled in a private university in Timika, Papua. The results revealed that the majority of participants employed four key strategies for vocabulary acquisition: social, memory, cognitive, and metacognitive. Notably, the memory strategy was most commonly utilized, with participants frequently associating new words with personal experiences to aid in retention. This study provided beneficial recommendations and suggestions for educators. In this sense, the findings of this study can be utilized as useful strategies to teach EFL students based on their interests. Thus, those strategies can facilitate them to achieve vocabulary mastery.


Keywords


Papuan EFL student, strategy in learning vocabulary, vocabulary mastery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asher, J. J. (2003). Learning another language through actions (6th ed.). Newman Ave, CA: Sky Oaks Productions, Inc.

Asyiah, D. N. (2017). The vocabulary teaching and vocabulary learning: perception, strategies, and influences on students’ vocabulary mastery. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 9(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2017.9.2.133-158

Atmazaki, A., & Indriyani, V. (2019). Design of reading materials based on contextual teaching and learning (CTL). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 301(Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018)), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-18.2019.38

Barcroft, J. (2015). Can retrieval opportunities increase vocabulary learning during reading? Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12139

Beck, I., Mckeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life (1st ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Bruner, J. (2017). A study of thinking (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315083223

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Cummins, J. (2019). The emergence of translanguaging pedagogy: A dialogue between theory and practice. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 9(1), 13.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327965PLI110401.

Dweck, C.S. (2014). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development (1st ed.). New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783048

Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfill your potential. London: Constable & Robinson Ltd.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Ghalebi, R., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2021). A study of vocabulary learning strategies among high and low Iranian English vocabulary learners. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1834933. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1834933

Krashen, S. D. (2004). Principle and practice in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2).

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Morrow, L. M., Woo, D. G., Meisinger, E. B., Sevcik, R. A., Bradley, B. A., & Stahl, S. A. (2006). Teaching children to become fluent and automatic readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1

Lestari, I. W., & Hardiyanti, N. (2020). Vocabulary learning autonomy through the incorporation of English songs: Indonesian EFL students’ perspectives. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 26(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2602-07

Mahardika, A. A. A. (2023). Thai students’ strategies in learning English vocabulary. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning, 26(2), 789–795. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6993

Marzano, I. R. J. (2009). Six steps to better vocabulary instruction. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 83–84.

Mayer, R. E. (2012). Multimedia learning. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 41, 2372–2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_285

Paivio, A. (2017). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. In (1st ed.). New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315785233

Patahuddin, S., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2017). Investigating Indonesian EFL learners’ learning and acquiring English vocabulary. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(4), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n4p128

Patra, I., Shanmugam, N., Ismail, S. M., & Mandal, G. (2022). An investigation of EFL learners’ vocabulary retention and recall in a technology-based instructional environment: Focusing on digital games. Education Research International, 2022, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7435477

Romrome, A. Y., & Mbato, C. L. (2023). Exploring EFL students’ motivation in essay writing through writing beliefs, self-efficacy, and attitudes: a case from Papua, Indonesia. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i1.4561

Sari, F. M. (2019). Enhancing student’s vocabulary mastery through project-based learning in the EFL classroom. Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on English Language Teaching and Learning (2nd ICON. The 2nd International Conference on English Language Teaching and Learning (2nd ICON-ELTL) 2019, 134–141.

Tseng, W. T., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58(2), 357–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00444.x

Zahedi, Y., & Abdi, M. (2012). The impact of imagery strategy on EFL learners ’ vocabulary learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 2264–2272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.197




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v5i1.8735

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

UC Journal is indexed in:

     

 

UC Journal Sinta 4 Certificate (S4 = Level 4)

We would like to inform you that UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, or UC Journal has been nationally accredited Sinta 4 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 152/E/KPT/2023. Validity for 5 years: Vol 2 No 1, 2021 till Vol 6 No 2, 2025

 

 

 

 

Flag Counter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/uc

e-ISSN (validity starting Vol 1, No 2, November 2020): 2774-9401

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

 UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, a scientific peer-reviewed journal, was established in 20 May 2020 and is published twice a year, namely in May and November, by the English Language Education Study Programme (S1/Sarjana PBI) in collaboration with the English Education Master's Programme (S2/Magister PBI) of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.