SFL-BASED ANALYSIS OF THEMATIC PROGRESSION OF ENGLISH GRADUATE PERSONAL STATEMENTS

Ghada Haji(1*),

(1) Higher Institute of Business Administration Tunisia, Tunisia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The main problem faced by graduate and undergraduate students in writing their university application letters includes the difficulties of producing a coherent and cohesive text that can convince the evaluators of their suitability to the target program. The present study was conducted principally to investigate the thematic progression patterns realized in students’ statements (henceforth PSs), for their considerable role in shaping the overall structure of the text and unfolding the writer’s identity. The corpus consists of 20 PSs written by graduate English students applying for a Master's in Sociology in Western institutions. Eggin’s (2004) framework of Theme and Rheme was applied to analyze the thematic progression patterns (TPP) observed and find out the dominant pattern revealed from the students’ texts. The findings of the analysis indicated the presence of two main thematic progression patterns, namely the Reiteration pattern and Zigzag pattern, with the total absence of the Multiple theme pattern. The obtained results of this work may offer valuable insights for academic writing instructions and material developers.


Keywords


coherence, personal statements, SFL, thematic progression pattern

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abed, A. Q. (2010). Patterns of thematic progression in C. Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities. IRAQI: Academic Scientific Journal, 92, 77-101. www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=4585

Alyousef, H. S. (2015). A multimodal discourse analysis of international postgraduate business students’ finance texts: an investigation of theme and information value. Social Semiotics, 26(5), 486-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1124518

Arancon, P. R. (2013). The use of SFL genre theory for the analysis of students’ writing skills in ESP. Monográfico, 245-262.

Barton, E., & Brown, R. (2004). Personal statements: A conversation with John Swales and Chris Feak. Issues in Writing, 15(1), 5-30.

Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brett, D. (2018). Theme and rheme in university application essays: A comparison of Japanese and British students’ personal statements in English. International Japanese Studies, 10(1), 85-103.

Bryman, A. (2011). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Christie, F., & Dreyfus, S. (2007). Letting the secret out: Successful writing in secondary English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 235-247.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Danes (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106-128). Prague: Academia /The Hague Mouton.

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2014). Thematic progression patterns in the IELTS task 2 writing. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 3(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v3i3.5219

Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistic. London: Printer Publishers.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.

Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2018). An analysis of cohesion of exposition texts: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal. v7i3.9791.

Enkvist, N. E. (1974). Theme dynamics and style: An experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 5, 127-135.

Fries, P. H., & Francis, G. (1992). Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 6, 45-59.

Fries, P. H. (1995). Methods of development, and texts: On subject and theme—a discourse functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Gómez-González, M. A. (2001). The rheme-topic interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Gunawan, W., Wirza, Y., & Holik, N. A. (2020). Textual construction of the hearing- impaired students recount texts: A case of students with special needs in writing to mean. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 526–537.

Haji, G. (2023). Self-promotion and identity construction in graduate personal statements. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 60–70.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.

Hendrawan, W., Sujatna, E. T. S., Krisnawati, E., & Darmayanti, N. (2021). Thematic progression in uncovering paragraph coherence: Some evidences in Indonesian secretarial academy context. TESOL International Journal, 10(1), 179–209.

Jalilifar, A. (2009). Thematic development in English and translated academic texts. Journal of Universal Language, 10(1), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2009.10.1.81

Jobar, N. A., Bahari, A. A., Jamian, A. R., & Rusli, N. F. M. (2020). The thematic flows in introductory paragraph in essay writing of non-native students. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(9), 2210–2222.

Lestari, S. H. P., Mujiyanto, J., & Saleh, M. (2019). the use of thematic progression in the journal article of “U-JET.” English Education Journal Eej, 9(4), 558–564. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej

Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp.457-461). Austin: University of Texas Press.

McCabe, A. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Aston University, England.

Nwogu, K., & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 369-384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Okta, Z., Ashadi, A., Triyono, S., & Pranowo, D. (2023). Thematic structure in students’ writings: Implications on their Ideas organization and development. Register Journal, 16(1). 49–72. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72

Ostrom, J., & Cook, W. (1993). Paragraph writing simplified. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis. In J. D. Brown & C. Christine (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 134-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pitler, M., Raghupathy, H., Mehta, A., Nenkova, A., Lee, L., & Joshi, A. (2008). Easily identifiable discourse relations. In C. Coling (ed.), Companion volume: Posters and demonstrations (pp. 85–88). Manchester, UK: Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.

Schmitt, N. (2002). An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Arnold.

Snape, D., & Spencer, L. (2003). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Richie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 1-23). Los Angeles: Sage.

Soleymanzadeh, L., & Gholami, J. (2014). Scoring argumentative essays based on thematic progression patterns and IELTS analytic scoring criteria. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(1988), 1811– 1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.610.

Tafakkori, S., & Moghani, H. (2018). The status of theme types and thematic progression patterns in English written biography texts: A systemic functional linguistics approach. 12, 45-69.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270

Wang, M. (2007). Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: Examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees' psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.455

Wang, X. W. (2010). Thematic progression pattern and coherence in English writing: Analysis of TEM-4 writing paper. Foreign Language Research, 9(1), 164-176.

Wei, J. (2013a). Corpus-based research on the development of thematic choices in Chinese learners’ English speech. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(16), 38-45.

Wei, J. (2014). Theme and thematic progression in learner English: A literature review. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(1), 67-80.

Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), New handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319-353). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

Zhang, H. P., & Li, L. (2009). Contrast studies on thematic progression in English newspaper and broadcasting news texts. Journal of XinJiang Education Institutem, 25(3), 117-120.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6579

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ghada Haji

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.