ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CONVERGENT THINKING ABILITY ON ENGLISH SPEAKING PROFICIENCY

Tasnova Humaira(1*),

(1) Brac University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Speaking in English is an important skill to master to gain an upper hand in a person’s academic and professional life. Different countries, where English is considered to be a foreign language, are emphasizing developing English language learning and teaching strategies to gain the status of globalization. To achieve this goal, English speaking skills play a crucial role as it is an effective mode of communication to connect with the world. This created an immense need to research how to develop the speaking skills of students studying at the university level. Therefore, this study researched the impact of convergent thinking ability to enhance English speaking proficiency among students. The instrument used to obtain the results are—Remote Associates Test (RAT) and Speaking Proficiency English Assessment Kit (SPEAK). At the end of the research, it was determined that if the education sector focuses on developing students' convergent thinking ability then the process of enhancing English speaking proficiency becomes easier.


Keywords


convergent thinking, English, speaking proficiency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abanador, J. R., Buesa, G. C. D., Remo, G. M. L., & Manibo, J. (2014). Teaching methods and learning preferences in the engineering department of an Asian university. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(1), 1-15.

Aiello, D. A., Jarosz, A. F., Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Firing the executive: When an analytic approach to problem solving helps and hurts. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(2), 116-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1128

Al-Eiadeh, A. R., Al-Sobh, M. A., Al-Zoubi, S. M., & Al-Khasawneh, F. (2016). Improving English language speaking skills of Ajloun National University students. International Journal of English and Education, 5(3), 181-195.

Amirian, S. M. R., Moqaddam, H. H., & Moqaddam, Q. J. (2017). Critical analysis of the models of language proficiency with a focus on communicative models. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(5), 400-407.

Azimi, S. A., Behjat, F., & Kargar, A. A. (2016). The impact of divergent and convergent tasks on Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension success. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 5(1), 17-34.

Aziz, J. (2018). Needs analysis of Bangladeshi English language learners at a tertiary classroom. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 102-111 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1145462

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford university press.

Bagarić, V., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2007). Defining communicative competence. METODIKA: časopis za teoriju i praksu metodika u predškolskom odgoju, školskoj i visokoškolskoj izobrazbi, 8(14), 84-93.

Bailey, K. M., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Speaking. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9-38.

Brown, K., Fishman, P., & Jones, N. (1990). Legal and policy issues in the language proficiency assessment of international teaching assistants. Houston: University of Houston Law Center.

Bygate, M. (2009). 23 Teaching and testing speaking. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 412-440). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch23

Chan, D. W. (2005). Self-perceived creativity, family hardiness, and emotional intelligence of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 47-56.

Choi, Y. H., & Lee, H. W. (2008). Current trends and issues in English language education in Asia. Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(2), 1-34.

Chowdhury, R., & Kabir, A. H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual Education, 4(1), 1-16.

Clark, J. L., & Swinton, S. S. (1980). The test of spoken English as a measure of communicative ability in English‐medium instructional settings. ETS Research Report Series, 1980(2), i-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1980.tb01230.x

Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391-404.

Farooqui, S. (2014). The struggle to teach in English: A case study in Bangladesh. Journal of education and human development, 3(2), 441-457.

Groom, N., & Littlemore, J. (2012). Doing applied linguistics: A guide for students. New York: Routledge.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.

Hajesfandiari, B., Mehrdad, A. G., & Karimi, L. (2014). Comparing the effects of convergent and divergent teaching methods on using articles by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 1(1), 313-327.

Hamid, M. O., & Honan, E. (2012). Communicative English in the primary classroom: Implications for English-in-education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 139-156.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Longman Pearson Education Limited.

Haseli, Z., & Rezaii, F. (2013). The effect of teaching critical thinking on educational achievement and test anxiety among junior high school students in Saveh. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2s), 168-175.

Holt, N. J. (2015). Schizotypy: A creative advantage?. In O. J. Mason & G. Claridge (Eds.), Schizotypy (pp. 197-214). New York: Routledge.

Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. K. (2011). Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273

Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self‐reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 20(8), 1065-1082.

Lee, C. S., Huggins, A. C., & Therriault, D. J. (2014). A measure of creativity or intelligence? Examining internal and external structure validity evidence of the Remote Associates Test. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036773

Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41(5), 306-320.

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marashi, H., & Tahan-Shizari, P. (2015). Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 99-117.

Mather, E., Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2014). Priming by relational integration in perceptual identification and Stroop colour naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 57-70.

Matin, M. F. (2013). Testing and evaluation of speaking ability. In board committee structure of international conference on linguistics (ICLing) (p. 326).

Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850

Moser, K., Zhu, D., Nguyen, H., & Williams, E. (2018). Teaching English language learners: A mainstream response to rural teacher preparation. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development (IJTEPD), 1(1), 58-75.

Nunan, D. (2003) Practical English language teaching. New York : Mc Graw Hill

Osborn, S., Osborn, M., & Osborn, R. (2019). Public speaking guidebook (58899th ed.). London: Pearson.

Powell, W., & Kusuma-Powell, O. (2010). Becoming an emotionally intelligent teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Rahman, M. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). A critical investigation of English language teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of communicative language teaching. English Today, 34(3), 43-49.

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Berlin: Springer.

Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The importance of four skills reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(1), 29-31.

Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: Memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1287-1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023921

Suh, J. M., & Seshaiyer, P. (2016). Modeling mathematical ideas: Developing strategic competence in elementary and middle school. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Trent, J. (2009). Enhancing oral participation across the curriculum: Some lessons from the EAP classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 256-270.

Volf, N. V., & Tarasova, I. B. (2013). The influence of reward on the performance of verbal creative tasks: Behavioral and EEG effects. Human Physiology, 39(3), 302-308.

Wang, Z. (2014). Developing accuracy and fluency in spoken English of Chinese EFL learners. English language teaching, 7(2), 110-118.

Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., Cropper, S. J., & Roze, K. (2017). The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(3), 235-258.

Yonsisno, Y. (2015). The effect of using debate technique toward students' speaking skill at the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 2 Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Jambi: Seri Humaniora, 17(1), 40-44.

Zaremba, A.J. (2003). Organizational communication. Canada: Thomson South-Western College Publishing.

Zhang, Y. (2009). Reading to speak: Integrating oral communication skills. English teaching forum, 47(1), 32-34.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Tasnova Humaira

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.