COMPARING LEXICAL DENSITY IN TEACHER TALKS: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL

Nyak Mutia Ismail(1), Marisa Yoestara(2*), Sitti Jamilah(3),

(1) Serambi Mekkah University
(2) Universitas Serambi Mekkah
(3) Universitas Terbuka
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Teacher talk must be specific, clear, concise, and comprehensible for students as the target interlocutors. This study aimed to characterize lexical density in teacher talks of elementary school teachers and university lecturers during teaching. A qualitative descriptive technique was used involving lexico-grammar analysis from an SFL perspective. The subjects of this study were three elementary school teachers (6th-grade teachers) and three university lecturers (English lecturers) who were voluntarily recorded during their teaching time; once for each. Hence, the object of this study is the transcriptions of teacher talks from these six research subjects which were then analyzed using documentation techniques of data analysis namely selection, categorization, classification, identification, and verification. The results show that the lexical density used in elementary school teacher talk is 42.65% (low) and that one employed at the university level is 36.76% (low). Unexpectedly, the rate for elementary school is somewhat higher than that for the university level. This case appears to have an intervening aspect because the elementary school is an international school. It is learned that an educational institution—regardless of its level—with a distinct learning target would certainly influence the lexical density employed in the teachers’ spoken discourse during classes.


Keywords


ELT, lexical density, systemic functional grammar, spoken discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afifah, N., Yusnilita, N., & Resiani, V. R. (2017). An analysis of teacher talk in English classroom interaction of the seventh grade students of SMPN 23 Oku. English Teaching Journal, 8(2), 7-28.

Arrumaisa, E., Rusmanayanti, A., Arapah, E., & Mu’in, F. (2019). The teacher talks in teaching reading comprehension. LINGUA EDUCATIA, 1(1), 29-41.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2008). Complementarities in language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman.

Ismail, N. M., Moriyanti, M., & Kurniadi, S. (2022). Standard implicature in teacher talks. In N. M. Ismail, A. H. Ummah, & R. H. Chaniago (Eds.), Communication today volume 1 (pp. 61-78). Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press.

Johansson, V. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing. Lund University: Lund University Press.

Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and

method. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Keumala, M., Fitrisia, D., Samad, I., & Gani, S. A. (2019). Am I getting my point across? Microstructure of English classroom discourses by Acehnese teachers. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.20954

Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). The concept of power in teacher

talk: A critical discourse analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal

(8), 1208-1215.

Menegale, M. (2008). Expanding teacher-student interaction through more effective classroom questions: From traditional teacher-fronted lessons to student-centred Lessons in CLIL. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy.

Mufidah, Z., & Wenanda, D. (2017). Kepadatan leksikal buku ajar muatan lokal bahasa Madura untuk kelas VI Sekolah Dasar. Prosodi, 11(2), 109-118.

Mulyati, A. F. (2013). A study of teacher talk and student talk in verbal classroom interaction to develop speaking skill for young learners. Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 1-10.

Nichols, J. (2009). Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and survey. In G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable (pp. 110-125). New York: Oxford University Press.

Pillow, B. H. (2008). Development of children's understanding of cognitive activities. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(4), 297-321.

Ramadhan, M. R. (2017). Lexical density and grammatical intricacy in written and spoken texts (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

Ryu, Y., & Sung, K. (2005). Teacher talk in an EFL university classroom. English Teaching, 60(1), 41-68.

Saragih, A. (2013). Discourse analysis: A study on discourse based on

systemic functional linguistic theory. Medan: State University of Medan.

Setiawati, L. (2012). A descriptive study on the teacher talk at EYL

classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 33-48.

Shomoossi, N., Amouzadeh, M., & Ketabi, S. (2008). Classroom interaction mediated by gender and technology: The language laboratory course. NovitasROYAL, 2(2), 176–184.

Solita, R., Alamsyah, H., & Lubis, A. A. (2021). Teacher talk in English foreign language classroom. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 5(2), 303-316.

Stubbs. M. (2002). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Sukmawati, N. N. (2018). Teacher talk in teaching English for young learners. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 30(1), 62-72.

Thornbury, S., & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (Eds.), Applications of linguistics (pp. 443-452.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Xiao-Yan, M. A. (2006). Teacher talk and EFL in university classroom (Unpublished mater thesis). Chongqing Normal University, Chapingba, China.

Yanfen, L. & Yuqin, Z. (2010). A study of teacher talk in interactions in English classes. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 76-86.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.4971

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Nyak Mutia Ismail, Marisa Yoestara, Sitti Jamilah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.