INDONESIAN GRADUATE STUDENTS’ CONSEQUENCES AND DECISIONS OF ENGLISH ACADEMIC WRITING INSTRUCTION (EAWI) AT HUNGARIAN UNIVERSITIES

Dedy Subandowo(1*), Dhafid Wahyu Utomo(2),

(1) Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary
(2) University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to assess the consequences and decisions of EAWI for Indonesian graduate students studying in a non-native English-speaking environment. This study seeks to shape the perception of the effects of EAWI and facilitate the decision to positively impact Indonesian graduate students enrolled in higher institutions in Hungary. The study employs a semi-structured interview on educational background, English as a medium of instruction (EMI), writing assignments, self-consciousness towards English academic writing (hereafter EAW), and attitudes towards English academic writing. Four Indonesian MA and MSc students enrolled in the Faculty of Social Sciences at three different universities were involved in this study. In addition to data interpretation, the audio-recorded interview was transcribed using a Web speech API application. The extracts were subsequently translated into English, coded, and categorized into the topics chosen. The findings illustrate the consequences of English academic writing instruction on the importance of language features and grammar for students. The results involve possible impacts, experiences, perspectives, and strategies to improve the English academic writing of Indonesian graduate students. Decision ties with the university and departmental regulations and attention to principles to provide an academic writing course in English.


Keywords


consequences, decision, English academic writing instruction (EAWI), L2 English academic writing, writing challenges

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorf, J. (2013). Web speech API. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1–11. https://www.juliusadorf.com/pub/web-speech-api.pdf

Al-Zubaidi, K. O. (2012). The Academic writing of arab postgraduate students: discussing the main language issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.246

Alias, A. A., Manan, N. A. A., Yusof, J., & Pandian, A. (2012). The use of Facebook as a language learning strategy (LLS) training tool on college students’ Ls use and academic writing performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67(November 2011), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.305

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Illustrated edition (15 April 2010).

Baghbadorani, E. A., & Roohani, A. (2014). The impact of strategy-based instruction on L2 learners’ persuasive writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.412

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (First). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Björkman, B. (2011). English as a lingua franca in higher education: Implications for EAP. English as a Lingua Franca in Higher Education : Implications for EAP, 22(22), 79–100.

Block, D. (2010). Globalization and language teaching. The Handbook of Language and Globalization, October, 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch12

Broggini, S., & Costa, F. G. (2017). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. An updated perspective from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 5(2), 238 - 264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jicb.5.2.04bro

Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Chien, S. C. (2012). Students' use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.655240

Clark, S. K. (2014). Writing strategies for science (2nd Ed.). Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.

Coleman, H. (2011). Allocating resources for English : The case of Indonesia's English medium Dreams and realities : Developing countries and the English language edited by Hywel Coleman (pp.1-27). Dreams and Realities: Developing Countries and the English Language, April 2011

Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X

Coleman, J., Hultgren, K., Li, W., Tsui, C. F. C., & Shaw, P. (2018). Forum on English-medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.469

Crystal, D. (1999). World English: Past, present, future. Paper to the ASKO Europa-Stiftung Symposium.

Dastjerdi, H. V., & Samian, S. H. (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL learners’ argumentative essays: Cohesive devices in focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 65–76.

Deane, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowles, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens-Tatum, J. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(2), i–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02141.x

Dearden, J. (2016). English medium instruction: A growing global phenomenon. Going Global 2016, October. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12079.94888

Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). John Benjamins Publishing company. in motivation and foreign language learning from theory to practice (Vol. 8, Issue 40, pp. 177–183). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.02str

Earls, C. W. (2013). Setting the Catherine wheel in motion. Language Problems and Language Planning, 37(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.37.2.02ear

Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese Universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00227.x

Gebhardt, R. C., & Rodrigues, D. (1989). Writing: Processes and intentions. Syracuse, NY: D.C. Health and Company.

Geiser, S., & Studley, with R. (2002). Uc and the sat: Predictive validity and differential impact of the sat i and sat ii at the University of California. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0801_01

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next : Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. In Alliance for Excellent Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/402829

Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing (First). London: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112.

Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005

Irvin, L. L. (2010). Research and study skills: Academic writing. Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, 1, 3–16.

Lamb, M., Waskita, D., Kuchah, K., Hadisantosa, N., & Ahmad, N. F. (2021). The state of English as medium of instructions in higher education institutions in Indonesia. London: Britiis Council.

Loewy, D., & Vogt, G. (2000). Sharing the responsibility of communication. Journal of Language for International Business, 11(1), 83–92.

Lueg, K., & Lueg, R. (2015). Why do students choose English as a medium of instruction? A bourdieusian perspective on the study strategies of non-native English speakers. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0009

Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350

McLeod, S. (1987). Some Thoughts about feelings: The affective domain and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 426. https://doi.org/10.2307/357635

Mohajeri, M., & Ketabi, S. (2013). ELT voices – India. International Electronic Journal for the Teachers of English, 3(5), 1–12.

Montgomery, S. (2004). Of towers, walls, and fields: Perspectives on language in science. Science, 303(5662), 1333–1335. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095204

Mukminin, A., Ali, R. M., & Ashari, M. J. F. (2015). Voices from within: Student teachers ’ experiences in English academic writing socialization at one Indonesian teacher training program voices from within : Student teachers, experiences in English academic. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1394–1407.

Nanyue, X. (2013). Graduate school of education the development of use of reporting verbs in academic writing: A case study with two chinese students. In The Asian ESP Journal (Issue September). The University of Exeter.

Okamura, A. (2006). Two types of strategies used by Japanese scientists, when writing research articles in English. System, 34, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.03.006

Okasha, M. A., & Hamdi, S. A. (2014). Using strategic writing techniques for promoting EFL writing skills and attitudes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 674–681. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.3.674-681

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960813

Peñuelas, A. B. C. (2012). The writing strategies of American university students: Focusing on memory, compensation, social and affective strategies. Elia, 12(1), 77–113.

Petzold, R., & Berns, M. (2000). Catching up with Europe: Speakers and functions of English in Hungary. World Englishes, 19(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00159

Stipendium Hungaricum Programme Operational Regulations, 1 (2021). Retrieved from https://stipendiumhungaricum.hu/uploads/2020/03/2021-11-09_SH_OR.pdf

Raoofi, S., Binandeh, M., & Rahmani, S. (2017). An investigation into writing strategies and writing proficiency of university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.24

Rose, M. (1985). Complexity, rigor, evolving method, and the puzzle of writer’s block: Thoughts on composing-process research. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write (pp. 227–260). New York: Guilford Press.

Russell, D. R., & Cortes, V. (2012). Academic and scientific texts: The same or different communities? Studies in Writing, 24, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-6304(2012)0000024005

Shofiya, A. (2004). Writing strategies employed by second language learners. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 5(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2013.5.1.93-103

Simbolon, N. E. (2018). Emi in Indonesian higher education: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Teflon Journal, 29(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v29i1/108-128

Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527

Subandowo, D. (2020). Challenges in English academic writing: Indonesian graduate students’ experiences in Hungarian higher education. The Teacher Education and Higher Education Studies ( EDiTE ) Doctoral Program of ELTE Conference Challenges in English Academic Writing : Indonesian Graduate Students ’ Experiences in Hungarian Higher Education.

Swales, J. M. (2017). The concept of discourse community: Some Recent personal history. Composition Forum, 37. Retrieved from https://compositionforum.com/issue/37/swales-retrospective.php

Tardy, C. M. (2005). “It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005

Taş, E. E. I. (2010). “In this paper i will discuss...”: Current trends in academic writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.022

Toms, C. (2013). Review of the book academic writing in a second language, by Ramona Tang (ed.). The Asian EFL Journal, 15(3), 286–287.

Torrance, M., & Thomas, G. V. (1994). The writing strategies of graduate research students in the social sciences. Higher Education, 27(3), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179901

Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (eds.). (2014). English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. ACA Papers on International Corporation in Education. Bonn: Lemmens Medien GmbH.

Wang, X. (2016). Language maintenance or language shift? The role of religion in a Hakka Catholic community in Malaysia. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(4), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1192850

Wilson, P., & Glazier, T. F. (2011). The least you should know about English. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Xu, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). L2 doctoral students ’ experiences in thesis writing in an English-medium university in New Zealand. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100779

Zhang, Z. (2011). A nested model of academic writing approaches: Chinese international graduate students’ views of English academic writing. Language and Literacy, 13(1), 39–59.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.4891

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dedy Subandowo, Dhafid Wahyu Utomo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

    

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.