INDONESIAN EFL STUDENTS’ THESIS CONCLUSIONS: ORGANIZATIONAL PREFERENCES AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS

Benedicta Avena(1), Mateus Yumarnamto(2*),

(1) Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
(2) Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper examines thesis conclusions written by the students of an English education program at a private university in East Java Indonesia. The central question guiding this study is “How do the authors of the theses organize their conclusions?” This study is a genre analysis. The data sources were 24 undergraduate thesis conclusions written from 2017 to 2019, consisting of 12 quantitative theses and 12 qualitative ones. The analysis was conducted in the framework of genre analysis by identifying the major moves and steps. Bunton’s (2005) framework for the generic structure of conclusions was used to understand the data. The results indicate that the majority of the conclusions follow the generic structure with its moves and steps as suggested by Bunton. However, different preferences in organizing the thesis conclusions were apparent between the two groups of thesis conclusions. These findings reflect the mastery of the particular academic genre by the students as well as their preferences in organizing moves and steps. Pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed in teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL).


Keywords


EAP, thesis conclusions, generic structure, TEFL, Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.195

Bazerman, C., Bonini, A., & Figueiredo, D. (2009). Genre in a changing world. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse.

Bhatia, V. K. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 21-39). New York: Routledge.

Bunton, D. (2001). Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 57-75). New York: Routledge.

Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004

Devitt, A. J. (2004). Writing Genre. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.01.005

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis. (pp. 219-228). New York: Routledge.

Elshadelin, G., & Yumarnamto, M. (2020). Cultural contents in two English textbooks in Indonesia: Representations and sources of culture. Beyond Words, 8(2), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v8i2.2511

Flowerdew, J. (2015). John Swales's approach to pedagogy in genre analysis: A perspective from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003

Flowerdew, J., & Forest, R. W. (2009). Schematic structure and lexico-grammatical realization in corpus- based genre analysis: The case of research in the PhD literature review. In M. Charles, D. Pecorari & S. Hunston (Eds.), Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse (pp. 15-36). New York: Continuum.

Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integr Psychol Behav Sci, 42(3), 266-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3

Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(2), 165-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344013000013

Heat, S. B., & Street, B. V. (2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5

Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A Genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Pruposes, 7(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4

Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005

Hyland, K. (2016). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100105

Hyland, K., & Wong, L. L. C. (2013). Innovation and change in English language education. New York: Routledge.

Johnston, B. (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science, 26(6), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600602

Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information Literacy in Higher Education: A Review and Case Study. Studies in Higher Education, 28(335-352). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070310000113441

Lamb, M., & Wyatt, M. (2019). Teacher motivation: The missing ingredient in teacher education. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education (pp. 522-535). New York: Routledge.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364

Leeuwen, T. V. (1993). Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: A synopsis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002004

Maher, P., & Milligan, S. (2019). Teaching master thesis writing to engineers: Insights from corpus and genre analysis of introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 55, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.05.001

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. New York: Routledge.

Paré, A. (2019). Re-writing the doctorate: New contexts, identities, and genres. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.08.004

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintan Nomor 74 Tahun 2008 tentang Guru (2017).

Richards, K., & Pilcher, N. (2017). Academic literacies: The word is not enough. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1360270

Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2019). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: Context, identity, genre. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.002

Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of reasearch article introduction. Written Communication, 4(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088387004002004

Tardy, C. M. (2005). “It's like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005

Tardy, C. M. (2011). The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.004

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2017, 33(3), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518

Xu, F. (2019). Learning the Language to Write for Publication: The Nexus Between the Linguistic Approach and the Genre Approach. 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_7

Yumarnamto, M., Widyaningrum, A. Y., & Prijambodo, V. L. (2020). Identity and Imagined Communities in English Textbooks' Illustrations. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2), 354-368. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258604




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.3715

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Benedicta Avena, Mateus Yumarnamto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.