Students Subject-Verb Agreement Errors in Paragraph Writing Class

Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali(1*), Made Frida Yulia(2),

(1) Satya Wacana Christian University
(2) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Subject-verb agreement is an essential element to master by English Language Education Study Program (ELESP) students, who are prepared to be English teachersin the future. However, the researchers still find the fact that ELESP students makethe errors on the agreement. For that reason, it would be significant to find out theerrors made by the students as well as to discover the factors behind the errors.To achieve those purposes, the researchers conducted a document analysis and asemi-structure interview.The research results showed most of the errors belongedto misinformation category (71.4%) and were subsequently followed by omissioncategory (17.9%) and addition category (10.7%). In addition, from the interview,the researchers also found five (5) major factors that caused the students to makethe errors, namely interlingual error, ignorance of rule restrictions, incompleteapplication of rules, false concepts hypothesized, and carelessness.

Keywords


errors, subject-verb agreement, Paragraph Writing Class

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azar, B. S. (1989). Understanding and Using English Grammar (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Azar, B. S. and Hagen S. A. (2006). Basic English Grammar (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., and Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fraenkel, J. R. and Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research An Introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Greenbaum, S. (1989). A College Grammar of English. New York: Longman.

Langan, J. (1996). College Writing Skills (4th ed.).New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1994). A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman Group Limited.

McDonough, J. and McDonough, S. (2004). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold.

Norrish, J. (1983). Language Learners and Their Errors. Hong Kong: The Macmillan Press Limited.

Ouirk, R. and Greenbaum, S. (1973). A University Grammar of English. Essex: Longman.

Richards, J. C. (1974). Error Analysis. London: Longman Group Limited.

Wood, F. T. (1981). Current English Usage. London: The Macmillan Press Limited.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v15i2.320

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali, Made Frida Yulia



Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.