PEER FEEDBACK IN COLLEGE EFL WRITING: A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Yuseva Iswandari(1*), Yizhe Jiang(2),

(1) Sanata Dharma University
(2) Ohio State University,
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Peer feedback in EFL setting has become an interesting area to explore in the past thirty years. This study reviews 16 empirical research studies on offline peer feedback in college EFL writing. There are 4 research questions addressed in this study, namely (1) what types of peer feedback are mostly researched in the past 10 years?, (2) what kinds of research objectives are addressed?, (3) what kinds of data collection and analysis methods are implemented to address the research questions?, and (4) what are methodological challenges reported in the studies reviewed? The researchers employed Norris and Ortega (2006) characteristics of systematic research synthesis and followed a chapter from Adolescent Literacies in a Multicultural Context edited by Cumming (2012). The findings show that there are four criteria of feedback types mainly involved: written/spoken, in-class/out-of-class, anonymous/non-anonymous, and trained/untrained. Most of these studies are designed to explore the students perceptions toward peer feedback processes and products, with qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methodologies. Furthermore, the methodological challenges emerged from these studies are discussed, especially the ethical issues. It is hoped that the research gaps identified in these studies and future research implications provided can shed light on future research in similar areas.


Keywords


peer feedback, EFL writing, college EFL setting, methodological review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Sanchez, C. E., Moshontz, H., Cooper, H. (2015). Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: Making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(1), 87-95.

Becker, A. (2006). In A. Horning & A. Becker (Eds.), Revision, history, theory, and practice (pp. 25-49). West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207-217.

Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Reslefsen, M. L., Mast, F., &

Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531-541.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102112.

Carvalho, J. B. (2002). Developing audience awareness in writing. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 271-282.

Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), l-19.

Chang, C. Y. (2016). Two decades of research in L2 peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 81-117.

Conner, A. M., & Moulton, M. R. (2000). Motivating middle school students to revise and edit. The English Journal, 90(1), 72.

Cote, R.A. (2014). Peer feedback in anonymous peer review in an EFL writing class in Spain. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 9, 67-87.

Cumming, A. (Ed.). (2012). Adolescent literacies in a multicultural context. New York, NY: Routledge.

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hanjani, A.M., Li, L. (2014). Exploring L2 writers collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance, System, 44, 101 - 114.

Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles of effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31-38.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, F., Nicols-Conesa, F., & Cerezo, L. (2016). Key issues of debate about feedback on writing. In R. M. Manchn & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbooks of second and foreign language writing (pp. 433-452). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

Keh, C. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-394. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.294

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International Ltd.

Kroll, B. (1981). Developmental relationships between speaking and writing. In B.M. Kroll & R.J. Vann (Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: connections and contrasts. (pp. 3254). Urbana, Illinois: NCTE.

Kusumaningrum, S. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). The effect of different types of peer feedback provision on EFL students writing performance. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 213224.

Lam, R. (2010). A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 114.

Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17.

Lichtman, M. (2014). Qualitative research for the socical sciences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewers own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.

Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992). ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 235-254.

Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 82-99.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rahimi, H. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 67-89.

Tahir, I. H. (2012). A study on peer evaluation and its influence on college ESL students. Social and Behavioral Science, 68(2020), 192-201.

Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer: Academic Publishers.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285). New York, NY: Plenum.

Yastibas, G.C., & Yastibas, A.E. (2015). The effect of peer feedback on writing anxiety in Turkish EFL (English as a foreign language) students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 530-538.

Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (20052014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461493.

Zhao, H. (2018). New insights into the process of peer review for EFL writing: A process-oriented socio-cultural perspective. Learning and Instruction, 58, 263-273.

Zoltn, D. (2018). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i2.2799

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Yuseva Iswandari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.