Content Validity and Authenticity of the 2012 English Test in the Senior High School National Examination
(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(2) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Psychological Association. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: Preliminary proposal.
American Psychologist, 7, 461-476.
American Psychological Association.(1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996).Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Fraenkel, J. R., &Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education (7thed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Gronlund, N. (1998). Assessment of student achievement (6thed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn& Bacon.
Jandaghi, G., &Shateria, F. (2008).Rate of validity, reliability and difficulty
indices for teacher-designed exam questions in first year high school.
International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 5:2. Retrieved
September 19, 2013 from http://www.insanbilimleri.com
McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary (7thed). (2005). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang Ujian Nasional.
Peraturan Menteri No. 59 tahun 2011 tentang Ujian Nasional.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Seif, A. A. (2004). Assessment and Evaluation in Education. Tehran: Doran Publication. Retrieved September 19, 2013 from
http://www.insanbilimleri.com
Tempo Interactive. (June, 2012). National exams warrant re-evaluation. Tempo. Retrieved on August 31, 2012, from http://www.tempo.co/read/
news/2012/06/.../055409165
Anggrita Desyani. (September, 2012). Rencana variasi 20 soal ujian nasional dikritik.Tempo. Retrieved on September 19, 2013, from
h t t p : / / w w w . t e m p o . c o / r e a d /news/2012/09/11/079428853/Rencana-Variasi-20-Soal-Ujian-
Nasional-Dikritik
Widdowson, H. G. (1976). The authenticity of language data. In John F. Fanselow & Ruth H. Crymes (Eds.), TESOL 76 (pp. 261-270). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v16i1.279
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Frisca Ayu Desi Widyaningrum, Carla Sih Prabandari
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.