A Preliminary Research to Develop A Customized Set of Vocabulary Size Test

Laurentia Sumarni

Abstract


This is a preliminary research to investigate useful words to function effectively in academic contexts, vocabulary size, the first-year students word list, and the steps to design the customized set of entry-level vocabulary size test. This research was a library research. To find out the ELESP students current vocabulary size, a vocabulary size test designed by Paul Nation was administered. The results show that useful words were (1) high-frequency words containing 2,000 word families, (2) academic words specified in the Academic Word List (Coxhead:2000), (3) technical words, (4) low-frequency words. The result of the administration of Nations Vocabulary Size Test shows that the students scores range between 33 and 96 words, with the mean score of 66. It means that the students vocabulary size ranges between 3,300 and 9,600 word families. The average students vocabulary size was 6,600 word families, which imply that most ELESP students are ready to read texts containing 88.7% word coverage. In order to increase their vocabulary size by 10,000 or more, they need to learn technical words and low-frequency words of a specialized subject area. Using Nations specifications for making the test, some procedures of test design are: Sampling the words for the items, Making the Stem, Writing the choices, The Order of the items in the Test, Piloting, Administering the Test. The decisions on curriculum, materials and teaching strategies should be based on the results of vocabulary size to gain optimum learning outcome.

Keywords


entry level vocabulary size test, high-frequency words, low-frequency level words

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R.C., & P. Freebody. (1983). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. In B. Houston (ed.), Advances in Reading/Language Research. Volume 2 (pp. 231-256). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.

Aziez, Furqanul. (2011). Examining the Vocabulary Levels of Indonesias English National Examination Texts. Asian EFL Journal, Professional Teaching Articles, Vol. 51, April 2011.

Cervatiuc, Andreea. (2008). ESL Vocabulary acquisition: Target and Approach. In the Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XIV, No. 1, January 2008. Available from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Cervatiuc-VocabularyAcquisition.html.

Coombe, Christine. Assessing vocabulary in the language classroom. In Malaysian English Language Teaching Association, pp. 111- 124.

Coxhead, A., (2010). Grabbed early by vocabulary: Nations ongoing contributions to vocabulary and reading in a foreign language. In Reading in a Foreign Language, April 2010, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-14.

Francis, N., & H. Kucera. (1982). Frequency analysis of English Usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Hanson, S., & Padua, Jennifer F. M. (2011). Teaching Vocabulary Explicitly. Honolulu: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL).

Hirsch, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? In Reading in a foreign language, Vol. 8 (2), 1992.

Huang, Jianbin., Yuedong, Sheng., & Ying, Xu. (2007). On the vocabulary size for Chinese English learners. In Polyglossia, Vol. 13, October 2007.

Meara, P. (1996). The vocabulary knowledge framework. In Lognostics.

Meara, P., & Alcoy, J. C. O. (2010). Words as species: an alternative approach to estimating productive vocabulary size. In Reading in a foreign Language, April 2010, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 222-236.

Nagy, W.E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson. R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of reading research: volume III (pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Nation, I.S.P. & Beglar, D. (2007) A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Nation, I. S. P. (1995-1996). Best Practice in vocabulary teaching and learning. EA Journal, 3 (2), 7-15.

Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6-19.

Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I., & Heatley, A. (2002). Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts [Computer Software]. Available from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx

Natin, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. In The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.

Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching Vocabulary: Strategies and Techniques. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 161-175.

Pikulski, John J., & Templeton, S. (2004). Teaching and Developing Vocabulary: Key to Long-Term Reading Success. Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved January 9, 2013, from http://www.eduplace.com/state/pdf/author/pik_temp.pdf.

Read, John. (2007). Second Language Vocabulary Assessment: Current Practices and New Directions. International Journal of English Studies. Vol. 7 (2), 2007, pp. 105-125. www.um.es/ijes.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. In SSLA, Vol. 20, pp. 17-36. Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary, description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Teaching vocabulary. Pearson Education, Inc.

Scott, Judith. A., Hoover, Merrit., Flinspach, Susan Leigh., & Vevea, Jack L. (n.d.) A multiple-level vocabulary assessment tool: measuring word knowledge based on grade-level materials. In National Reading Conference Yearbook, No. 57, pp. 325-340.

Thorndike, E., & Lorge, I. (1944). The Teachers Word Book of 30,000 Words. Columbia: Teachers College.

Watts, J. Measuring the effectiveness of a vocabulary programme. Pp. 15-25.

Xing, P., & Fulcher, G. (2006). Reliability Assessment for Two Versions of Vocabulary Levels Tests. www.sciencedirect.com.

Internet vocabulary testing websites

http://www.lextutor.ca/

http://my.vocabulary.com

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation.aspxhttp://jalt-publications.org/tlt/resources/2007/0707a.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v17i1.260

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Laurentia Sumarni



Indexed and abstracted in:

    

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.