Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love: Exploring Shusterman’s Writing Identity in the Discourse on the Art of Lovemaking and Body Aesthetics

Setiono Sugiharto

doi:10.24071/joll.v24i2.9700

Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love: Exploring Shusterman’s Writing Identity in the Discourse on the Art of Lovemaking and Body Aesthetics

Setiono Sugiharto^(1*),

(1) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Standing in marked contrast with Foucauldian notion of “the care for the self” which seeks bodily pleasure by advocating violent practices of consensual homosexual sadomasochism and drugs, Shusterman’s Ars Erotica takes up the notion further by unveiling the idea of somaesthetics that alternatively favors such tranquil, less violent somatic practices as a pursuit of bodily pleasure and cultivation. Rich in its cross-cultural perspectives of how artistic body practices (including the art of love making) are cultivated, Ars Erotica combines important ideas from different philosophical traditions with literary works emanating from varied cultural, religious, and linguistic legacies. The mixture of both philosophy and literature in the book helps reconcile the long-standing disputes regarding the divide between the two scholarships, thus making Shusterman’s writing worthy of investigating. Drawing on these notions of aspects of identity – “self as author” and “discoursal self” (Ivanic, 1998), this article is an attempt to explore these aspects of identity. Thematic coding was used as a technique of data analysis. Findings revealed that aspects of identity can be categorized and suggested as follows: (1) taking control by evaluating while averring to reliable sources, (2) interfering credible sources by infusing personal positioning (3) translanguaging to create aesthetic textual postures.

Keywords

Ars Erotica, aspects of identity, self as author; discoursal self

Full Text:

PDF

References

Brooke, R. (1989). Control in writing: Flower, Derida, and images of the Writer, College English, 51(4), 405-417.

Burgess, A. & Ivanič, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310363447.

Derrida, J. (1974). Of Grammatology (trs. Gayatri Spivak). Baltimore: John Hopkins.

Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigm in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Lincoln Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220

Hyland, K. (2011). Community and individuality: Performing identity in applied Linguistics, Written Communication, 27(2), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309357846

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ivanič, R. & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice and self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0

Kobayashi, H. & Rinnert, C. (2023). Developing Multilingual Writing: Agency, Audience, Identity. Switzerland: Springer.

Lie, W. (2018). Translanguaging as practical theory of language, Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039

Matsuda, P.K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse. Implications for second language Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 35-53). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9

Park, J.Y. (2023). Agency, Identity, and Writing: Perspectives from First-Generation Students of Color in Their First Year of College, Research in the Teaching of English, 57(3), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202332353

Shand, J., & Konza, D. (2016). Creating the student writer: A study of writing identities in non-academic senior English classes. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, The, 39(2), 149. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03651968

Shusterman, R. (2021). Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shusterman, R. (2022). Philosophy and the Art of Writing. New York: Routledge.

Silva, T. (2005). On the philosophical bases of inquiry in second language writing: Metaphysic, inquiry paradigm, and the intellectual zeitgeist. In P.K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second Language Writing Research: Perspectives on the Process of Knowledge Construction (3-15). Mahwahh, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sugiharto, S. (2015). Translingualism in action: Rendering the impossible possible. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 12(2), 125-154. Retrieved from http://journal.asiatefl.org/main/main.php

Sugiharto, S. (2024). Straddling the personal and the academic: How self in academic writing is constructed in contact zone. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 478-504. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i2.35964

Tang, R. & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun, English for Specific Purposes, 18, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5

Tardy, C. M. (2012). Current conceptions of voice. In Hyland, K. & Guinda, C.S. (Eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres (pp. 34-48). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Young, V.A. (2009). “Nah, we straight”: An argument against code=switching, Journal of Advanced Composition, 29(1-2), 49-76. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20866886

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.9700