Modern Priyayi and The Failure of the Third Space in Kayam’s Two Fictions

Paulus Sarwoto

doi:10.24071/joll.v23i1.5870

Modern Priyayi and The Failure of the Third Space in Kayam’s Two Fictions

Paulus Sarwoto

Abstract

Umar Kayam’s fictions, “Kimono Biru” (Blue Kimono) and Jalan Menikung (Turning Road) retell rampant corruption plaguing most postcolonial states. The priyayi figuration in both stories, supposed to transform the third space of postcolonial Indonesia into liberative force, fails miserably. Rather than re-visiting positivist view of third space as found in many literatures, this analysis shows a re-imagination of its failure. The replacement of colonial leaders by domestic leaders does not guarantee true independence since the new middle class replicate the corrupt system for their own benefits. While corrupt priyayi thrives, the protagonist priyayi figures upholding potential transformative power in both fictions are rendered powerless in this newly independent state. Suwandi in “Kimono Biru” is an epitome of postcolonial politicians who are both politician and oligarch guarding the status quo – a system supported by money politics to manipulate the mass. Mustari, his old friend in fighting for independence from colonial Dutch, has to live a meagre live as the cost for maintaining his integrity. Similarly, in the priyayi in Jalan Menikung are also divided along similar lines. Sastradarsono’s posterity who chooses to be a corrupt military official (Nugroho) and a business tycoon (Tommi) live comfortably while those who side with the suffering mass have to live a difficult life because of their honourable idealism.

Keywords

corruption, postcolonial, New Order

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alviah, Iin. (2019). “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Tuturan Novel Para Priyayi Karya Umar Kayam.” Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 3(1), pp. 104–15.

Anderson, Benedict. (2000). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

Ashcroft, Bill. (2001). Post-Colonial Transformation. London: Routledge.

Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. (2001). Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies. New York: Routledge.

Bhabha, Homi K. (2002). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Cesaire, Aime. (2000). Discourse on Colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Césaire, Aimé. (2002). A Tempest. New York: Theater Communications Group, Inc.

Cruikshank, Robert B. (1972). “Abangan, Santri, and Prijaji: A Critique.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 3(1), pp. 39–43.

Fanani, Ahwan. 2017. “Identitas Dan Mobilitas Sosial Priyayi Dalam Novel Para Priyayi Karya Umar Kayam.” Sabda : Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan 12(1), p. 42. doi: 10.14710/sabda.v12i1.15252.

Fanon, Frantz. (1971). The Wretched of the Earth. Ringwood Vic: Pengiun Books.

Fanon, Frantz. (2006). “The Pitfalls of National Consciousness.” in The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, edited by B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, and H. Tiffin. London: Routledge.

Geertz, Clifford. (1964). Religion of Java. London: The Free Press of Glencoe.

Hill, Hal. (1994). Indonesia’s New Order: The Dynamics of Socio-Economic Transformation. Canberra : Allen & Unwin

Kartodirdjo, Sartono, A. Sudewo, and Suhardjo Hatmosuprobo. (1987). Perkembangan Peradaban Priyayi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Kayam, Umar. (1980). Sri Sumarah and Other Stories. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational books (Asia).

Kayam, Umar. (1986). “Kimono Biru Buat Istri.” in Sri Sumarah dan Cerita Pendek Lainnya, edited by U. Kayam. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Kayam, Umar. (1992). Para Priyayi. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Kayam, Umar. (1999). Jalan Menikung (Para Priyayi 2). Jakarta: Grafiti.

Koentjaraningrat. (1963). “Pembitjaraan Buku: Clifford Geertz’s The Religion of Java.” Madjalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sastra Indonesia I(2), pp. 188–91.

Lipsky, Seth, and Raphael Pura. (1978). “Indonesia: Testing Time for the ‘New Order.’” Foreign Affairs 57(1).

Mawaddah, Haalin, Suyitno Suyitno, and Raheni Suhita. (2021). “Javanese Women’s Efforts to Face Patriarchal Culture in the Novel Para Priyayi by Umar Kayam.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 8(1), p. 100. doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v8i1.2267.

Rahmanto, B. (2004). Umar Kayam: Karya Dan Dunianya. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Ricklefs, M. C. (2001). A History of Modern Indonesia Since C. 1200. London: Palgrave.

Ricklefs, M. C. (2006). Mystic Synthesis in Java: A History of Islamization from the Fourteenth to the Early Nineteenth Centuries. Norwalk: EastBridge.

Said, Edward. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

Said, Edward. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.

Sarwoto, Paulus. (2004). “The Figuration of Caliban in the Constellation of Postcolonial Theory.” Louisiana State University.

Setiadi, David, Yati Aksa, and M. Adji. (2013). “Konsep Ke-Priyayi-an Yang Terefleksi Dalam Noveo Para Priyayi Karya Umar Kayam Dan Gadis Pantai Karya Pramoedya Ananta Toer.” (April):25–30.

Sutherland, Heather. 1975. “The Priyayi.” Indonesia, 19, pp. 57–77.

Sutherland, Heather Amanda. (1973). “Pangreh Pradja: Java’s Indigenous Administrative Corps and Its Role in the Last Decades of Dutch Colonial Rule.” Yale, New Haven.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v23i1.5870