Gender, Language and Politics: the Representation of Theresa May on Twitter
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim (MALIKI) Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldoory, L. (1998). The Language of Leadership for Female Public Relation Professionals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(2), 73-101.
Alton, L. (2017). 3 reasons videos capture Twitter's mobile audience. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from website: https://business.twitter.com/en/blog/3-reasons-videos-capture-twitters-mobile-audience.html
Baker, M. A. (1991). Gender and verbal communication in professional settings: A view of research. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 36-63.
Baxter, J. (2010). The Language of Female Leadership. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baxter, J. (2012). Women of the corporation: A sociolinguistic perspective of senior women’s leadership language in the U.K. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(1), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00520.x
Baxter, J. (2017). Resolving a gender and language problem in women's leadership: Consultancy research in workplace discourse. Discourse & Communication 2017, 11(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1750481317691858
Beltran, J., et al. (2020). Male and female politicians on Twitter: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12392
Bennett, W. L. (2011). News: The Politics of Illusion (9th ed). New York: Longman.
Bradac. J. J. Mulac, A., & Thompson, S. A. (1995). Men's and women's use of intensifier and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analysis. Research on Human and Social Interaction, 28, 93-1 16.
Cameron, D., & Shaw, S. (2016). Gender, Power and Political Speech: Woman and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan
Ceron, A., et. al. (2013). ‘Every Tweet Counts? How Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Can Improve Our Knowledge of Citizens’ Political Preferences with an Application to Italy and France.’ New Media & Society 16, 340–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813480466
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Curtin, J. (2008). Women, Political Leadership and Substantive Representation: the Case of New Zealand. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3), 490-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn014
Dӧhler, M. (1991). Policy Networks, Opportunity Structures and Neo-Conservative Reform Strategies in Health Policy. In B. Marin, & R. Mayntz, Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 235-296). Frankfrut: Campus Verlag.
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A method for advanced students. London & New York: Routledge.
Fishing for Leave. (2019, March 23). Why the Withdrawal Agreement is disastrous for British Fishing. Retrieved October 17, 2019. From website: http://ffl.org.uk/2303-2
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2011). Rebooting American Politics: The Internet Revolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gotter, A. (2019, October 17). 23 Strategies to Increase Your Twitter Engagement. Retrieved July 20, 2020. From website: https://adespresso.com/blog/23-strategies-increase-twitter-engagement/
Graddol, D., & Swann. J. (1989). Gender wires. Cambridge. MA: Basil Blackwell.
Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2014). ‘New Platform, Old Habits? Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the 2010 British and Dutch General Election Campaigns.’ New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444814546728
Heywood, A. (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction 6th edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, J. (2005). ‘The glass ceiling’ – does talk contribute? Gendered discourse in the New Zealand Workplace. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association, 4–7 July, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2011). ‘Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.545181
Karapetjana, I. (2011). Pronominal choice in political interviews. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 1, 36–45. DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
McNair, B. (2011). An Introduction to Communication: Fifth Edition. Oxon: Routledge.
Miller, C., & nSwift, K. (1991). Words and Women. New York: Harper Collins.
Milne, C. (2019, November 26). The £20.5 billion NHS England spending increase is the largest five-year increase since the mid-2000s. Retrieved August 08, 2020. From website: https://fullfact.org/election-2019/nhs-spending-biggest-boost/
Mukhortov, D.S., & Malyavina, Y.S. (2019). Cross-situational consistency of female politicians’ language use. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics, and Semantics, 10(4), 1021—1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-4-1021-1036
Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1-25.
Paxton, P., & Hudges, M. M. (2007). Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. London: Pine Forge Press.
Ridwan. (2006). Kekerasan Berbasis Gender: Rekonstruksi Teologis, Yuridis, dan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Gender.
Rolls, J. A. (1993). The Influence of Language Style and Gender on Perceptions of Leadership Potential: A Review of Relevant Literature. The 79th Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (pp. 2-30). Florida: EDRS.
Spierings, N., & Jacobs, K. (2014). ‘Getting Personal? The Impact of Social Media on Preferential Voting.’ Political Behavior 36, 215–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9228-2
Stockemer, D. (2007). Why are there Differences in the Political Representation of Women in the 27 Countries of the European Union? Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 8,(4), 476 – 493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850701640884
Trippi, J. (2005). The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet and the Overthrow of Everything. New York: HarperCollins.
Vergeer, M. (2015). Twitter and Political Campaigning. Sociology Compas, 745-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12294
Wahyudi, R. (2018). Situating English Language Teaching in Indonesia within a Critical, Global Dialogue of Theories: A Case Study of Teaching Argumentative Writing and Cross-Cultural Understanding Courses (Doctoral Thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Wardaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Wilson, F. (1992) ‘Language, Technology, Gender, and Power’, Human Relations, 45 (9), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001872679204500902
Yarchi, M., & Samuel-Azran, T. (2018). Women politicians are more engaging: male versus female politicians’ ability to generate users’ engagement on social media during an election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 978-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1439985
Zakiyah, U. (2020). Gender and Language: Representation of Theresa May's Leadership on Twitter. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim: Unpublished Thesis. Accessed from: http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/25838/
https://twitter.com/theresa_may/status/1129424592198619136 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)
https://twitter.com/theresa_may/status/1083047044875472901 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1093524616977530886 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)
https://twitter.com/theresa_may/status/1114143489980346368 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4676
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
JOLL is indexed in:
This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License