Gender, Language and Politics: the Representation of Theresa May on Twitter

Umi Zakiyah(1), Ribut Wahyudi(2*),

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim (MALIKI) Malang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The relationship between women leaders’ language, social media, and politics has been interesting to be discussed.  However, there are lacks previous studies that examined the women leaders’ language and how the word choices represent women leaders on Twitter.Thus, this study aims to find out Theresa May’s language on Twitter and how those word choices represent herself as a woman leader. The data are taken from the tweets on Theresa May’s Twitter account over the last six months of her leadership reign (from January until July 2019), which focused on her crucial tweets about politics and leadership. The researchers adopted four theories to capture and analyze the data from different angles to produce the rich analysis of Theresa May’s word choices and representation on Twitter. The study revealed several word choices used by Theresa May into four categories: (1) announcement tweets, (2) attack/negative tweets, (3) personal characteristics, and (4) policy. Furthermore, the study also found that Theresa May utilized those word choices to represent herself as a political leader. She also used metaphors and pronouns to shape the desired representation. Furthermore, not all PDA elements by Fairclough & Fairclough (2012) were employed due to the limited characters number on Twitter or other possible purpose(s). This study is beneficial to enrich the knowledge on how the use of language by woman leader is implicated within social and political contexts of a country. The Linguistics analysis on gender, language, and politics is another take away from this research.

Keywords


Conservative Party; leadership; representation; Twitter; Theresa May

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldoory, L. (1998). The Language of Leadership for Female Public Relation Professionals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(2), 73-101.

Alton, L. (2017). 3 reasons videos capture Twitter's mobile audience. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from website: https://business.twitter.com/en/blog/3-reasons-videos-capture-twitters-mobile-audience.html

Baker, M. A. (1991). Gender and verbal communication in professional settings: A view of research. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 36-63.

Baxter, J. (2010). The Language of Female Leadership. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Baxter, J. (2012). Women of the corporation: A sociolinguistic perspective of senior women’s leadership language in the U.K. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(1), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00520.x

Baxter, J. (2017). Resolving a gender and language problem in women's leadership: Consultancy research in workplace discourse. Discourse & Communication 2017, 11(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1750481317691858

Beltran, J., et al. (2020). Male and female politicians on Twitter: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12392

Bennett, W. L. (2011). News: The Politics of Illusion (9th ed). New York: Longman.

Bradac. J. J. Mulac, A., & Thompson, S. A. (1995). Men's and women's use of intensifier and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analysis. Research on Human and Social Interaction, 28, 93-1 16.

Cameron, D., & Shaw, S. (2016). Gender, Power and Political Speech: Woman and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan

Ceron, A., et. al. (2013). ‘Every Tweet Counts? How Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Can Improve Our Knowledge of Citizens’ Political Preferences with an Application to Italy and France.’ New Media & Society 16, 340–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813480466

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Curtin, J. (2008). Women, Political Leadership and Substantive Representation: the Case of New Zealand. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3), 490-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn014

Dӧhler, M. (1991). Policy Networks, Opportunity Structures and Neo-Conservative Reform Strategies in Health Policy. In B. Marin, & R. Mayntz, Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 235-296). Frankfrut: Campus Verlag.

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A method for advanced students. London & New York: Routledge.

Fishing for Leave. (2019, March 23). Why the Withdrawal Agreement is disastrous for British Fishing. Retrieved October 17, 2019. From website: http://ffl.org.uk/2303-2

Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2011). Rebooting American Politics: The Internet Revolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gotter, A. (2019, October 17). 23 Strategies to Increase Your Twitter Engagement. Retrieved July 20, 2020. From website: https://adespresso.com/blog/23-strategies-increase-twitter-engagement/

Graddol, D., & Swann. J. (1989). Gender wires. Cambridge. MA: Basil Blackwell.

Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2014). ‘New Platform, Old Habits? Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the 2010 British and Dutch General Election Campaigns.’ New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444814546728

Heywood, A. (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction 6th edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holmes, J. (2005). ‘The glass ceiling’ – does talk contribute? Gendered discourse in the New Zealand Workplace. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association, 4–7 July, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford: Blackwell.

Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2011). ‘Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.545181

Karapetjana, I. (2011). Pronominal choice in political interviews. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 1, 36–45. DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379

Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

McNair, B. (2011). An Introduction to Communication: Fifth Edition. Oxon: Routledge.

Miller, C., & nSwift, K. (1991). Words and Women. New York: Harper Collins.

Milne, C. (2019, November 26). The £20.5 billion NHS England spending increase is the largest five-year increase since the mid-2000s. Retrieved August 08, 2020. From website: https://fullfact.org/election-2019/nhs-spending-biggest-boost/

Mukhortov, D.S., & Malyavina, Y.S. (2019). Cross-situational consistency of female politicians’ language use. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics, and Semantics, 10(4), 1021—1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-4-1021-1036

Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1-25.

Paxton, P., & Hudges, M. M. (2007). Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. London: Pine Forge Press.

Ridwan. (2006). Kekerasan Berbasis Gender: Rekonstruksi Teologis, Yuridis, dan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Gender.

Rolls, J. A. (1993). The Influence of Language Style and Gender on Perceptions of Leadership Potential: A Review of Relevant Literature. The 79th Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (pp. 2-30). Florida: EDRS.

Spierings, N., & Jacobs, K. (2014). ‘Getting Personal? The Impact of Social Media on Preferential Voting.’ Political Behavior 36, 215–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9228-2

Stockemer, D. (2007). Why are there Differences in the Political Representation of Women in the 27 Countries of the European Union? Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 8,(4), 476 – 493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850701640884

Trippi, J. (2005). The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet and the Overthrow of Everything. New York: HarperCollins.

Vergeer, M. (2015). Twitter and Political Campaigning. Sociology Compas, 745-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12294

Wahyudi, R. (2018). Situating English Language Teaching in Indonesia within a Critical, Global Dialogue of Theories: A Case Study of Teaching Argumentative Writing and Cross-Cultural Understanding Courses (Doctoral Thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

Wardaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Wilson, F. (1992) ‘Language, Technology, Gender, and Power’, Human Relations, 45 (9), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001872679204500902

Yarchi, M., & Samuel-Azran, T. (2018). Women politicians are more engaging: male versus female politicians’ ability to generate users’ engagement on social media during an election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 978-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1439985

Zakiyah, U. (2020). Gender and Language: Representation of Theresa May's Leadership on Twitter. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim: Unpublished Thesis. Accessed from: http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/25838/

https://twitter.com/theresa_may/status/1129424592198619136 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)

https://twitter.com/theresa_may/status/1083047044875472901 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1093524616977530886 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)

https://twitter.com/theresa_may/status/1114143489980346368 (link of Theresa may’s tweet)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4676

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by  Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.

JOLL is indexed in:

       


This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats