Collocability of Mental Capacity Evaluative Adjectives in Current English

Bazili Evarist Bamuhiga(1*),

(1) Sokoine University of Agriculture
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The study was conducted to investigate the collocability of mental capacity evaluative adjectives in current English. In English people have been and are still describing each other. This description goes hand in hand with giving value to other people especially on the intelligence of a person. In English language, this function is fulfilled with the use of a number of devices one of which is evaluative adjectives, more specifically evaluative mental capacity adjectives. However, the understanding of the way these adjectives are used to convey a given value in a given particular context is limited. Thus the current study contributes to this limited knowledge by exploring how this device is used by looking at collocability of such adjectives. The study was guided by a major research question namely: What nouns do positive evaluative mental capacity adjectives collocate with? The study was a corpus-based study and the data were extracted from British National Corpus. The analysis is based on five positive adjectives namely bright, intelligent, sharp, clever and smart. In the analysis, both qualitative and descriptive statistics techniques were employed. The findings show that the studied adjectives collocate with nouns of particular human reference or related to human cognitive actions or parts of human body. Thus three general categories of nouns that collocate with these adjectives are common nouns, proper nouns, and pronoun.


Keywords


evaluative adjectives; collocation; current English; British National Corpus

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhatia Vijay K et al. (2005). Vagueness in Normative Texts. Postfach: European Academic Publishers.

Biber D, & Conrad S. (2001). Quantitative Corpus Based Research. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 35 No.2 (Summer)

Carleton, N., McCreary, D., Norton, P., & Asmundson, G. (2006). Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale Revised. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 297-303.

Finch, Geoffrey. (2005). Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Givon, Talmy. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction vol.1. Philadephia: Library of Congress.

Graddol, D (2000). The Future of English. The British Counsel.

Leech, Geoffrey. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

McEnery, Tony & Wilson, Andrew. (2001). Corpus Linguistic: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Mindt, Ilka. (2011) Adjective Complementation: An Empirical Analysis of Adjectives Followed by "That"-clauses. New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Nesselhauf, N (2005). Collocation in a Learner Corpus. Philadephia: John Benjamini publishing company.

Quirk, Randolph & Greenbaum, Sidney. (1973). University Grammar of English, London: Longman.

Seratan, V (2011) Syntax-Based Collocation Extraction. London: Springer.

Stubbs, Michael. (2002). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v19i2.2116

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by  Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.

JOLL is indexed in:

       


This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats