Email this article 
DISCIPLINE-BASED VS. SPIRAL LEARNING APPROACH TO SCIENCE EDUCATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS IN THE PHILIPPINE SETTING
(1) Presidential School of Qarshi, Agency for Presidential Educational Institution of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The Philippines started the K to 12 curricula and spiral progression approach in 2012 turning back from the discipline-based curriculum. Many educators and researchers that it is a must to transfer to the spiral progression approach. This paper examined and evaluated both approaches based on various literature in the context of the Philippines since many people have appealed to go back to the old system. There is overwhelming literature that suggests the benefits of the spiral progression approach in terms of the academic achievement of students and mastery of learning. There was much literature also saying that there is a wide-ranging need for improvement in this spiral progression and K to 12 curricula as a whole. Being said, the country should overhaul the system but not abolish it. There are more benefits than harm in the spiral progression and K to 12 systems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chai, C. S., Rahmawati, Y., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Indonesian science, mathematics, and engineering preservice teachers’ experiences in STEM-TPACK design-based learning. Sustainability, 12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219050
Corbacho, A. & Basile, M. (2021). Interdisciplinary higher education with a focus on academic motivation and teamwork diversity. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062
Cordogan, S. (2001). A four-year contrast between high school students in interdisciplinary and discipline-based curriculum programs: Behavioral and academic implications [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Cooles, P., Harrigan-Vital, M., & Laville, A. (2014) Student performance and grading changes in a systems-based curriculum. Medical Education Online, 19(1).https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.23165
De Dios, A. (2013). Spiral curriculum: When and how? Redundant versus progressive?. Retrieved from https://www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/2013/05/spiral-curriculum-when-and-how.html
Dio, R. V. (2020). Exploring vertical coherence of content topics in Philippine spiral Kto10 mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(11), 259-282.
Dunton, J. & Co, W. (2019). Spiral progression approach in teaching science and the performance of learners in District I, Capiz. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012045
Garcia, R. (2020). Factors that influence students’ learning progress in the science spiral progression curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(2), 79-99.
Gardner, M. (2017). Understanding integrated STEM science instruction through experiences of teachers and students (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University). New York: Syracuse University.
Gibbs, D. (2018). Integration vs. discipline-based approaches to learning: Not an either/or. Retrieved from https://blog.lowellschool.org/blog/integration-vs.-discipline-based-approaches-to-learning-not-an-either-or
Hyry-Beihammer, E. K., & Hascher, T. (2015). Multi-grade teaching practices in Austrian and Finnish primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.07.002
Idaho Government (2012). Moving toward mastery-based education doesn't mean starting over or abandoning the important work you've already done. Retrieved from https://www.sde.idaho.gov/mastery-ed/files/guides/Key-Shifts-and-Indicators.pdf
Igcasama, R. M. (2021). Teachers and students’ perceptions on the implementation of K-12 spiral progression approach. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 5(1), 116-124.
Kryzanowski, J., & Carnine, D. (1980). The effects of massed versus spaced formats in teaching sound-symbol correspondences to young children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 225-229.
Magana, A. J., Falk, M. L., & Reese Jr., M. J. (2013). Introducing discipline-based computing in undergraduate engineering education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13(4), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2534971
Mangali, G., Tongco, C., Aguinaldo, K. P., & Calvadores, C. J. (2019). Stories of students toward spiral progression approach in science: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 2(2), 37-48.
Maths No Problem. (2022). What is Singapore math? Retrieved from https://mathsnoproblem.com/en/approach/what-is-singapore-maths/
Ng, S.F. (2022). The model method: Crown jewel in Singapore mathematics. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(2), 147-161.
Orale, R. L., & Uy, M. E. A. (2018). When the spiral is broken: Problem analysis in the implementation of spiral progression approach in teaching mathematics. Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 14-24.
Pearson, J. & Flory, M. (2014). Beyond proficient: How three high schools in Kentucky implement mastery learning. Arlington: Institute of Public Research Education.
Saint Mary’s University. (2017). Critical analysis. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58d01deed482e982a9e679b5/t/5af0cd36575d1fc34f34d656/1525730615062/Critical+Analysis.pdf
UNESCO. (2022). Discipline-based curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/glossary-curriculum-terminology/d/discipline-based-curriculum
Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., & malone, J. (2010). The integration of science, mathematics, and technology in a discipline-based culture. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 294-302
Wiggins, G. (1991). Teaching to the (authentic) test. In A. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds, a resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 344-350).
Writing Center. (n.d.). Writing critical analysis papers. University of Washington. Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/pswrite/Handouts/CriticalAnalysisPapers.pdf
Yang, G.L. (2007). Educating educators on mastery learning and spiral learning (Graduate thesi, Regis University, Colorado). Denver: Regis University Theses. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/886
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v7i1.5598
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Frank Angelo Abayog Pacala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
IJIET Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching):has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 5 No 2, 2021 until Vol 10 No 1, 2026.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIET DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet
p-ISSN: 2548-8422 (since 5 January 2017); e-ISSN: 2548-8430 (since 5 January 2017)
IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) is published twice a year, namely in January and July, by the Institute for Research and Community Services of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.