Self Efficacy, Trust Toward Leader dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif

Ch. Ndaru Tyas S.(1*),

(1) SMK N 2 Sewon Bantul Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to examine whether self efficacy has positive influence on innovative work behavior of teachers (innovative work behavior) and whether trust in leadership (trust toward leader) positive effect on the innovative behavior of teachers (innovative work behavior). This study uses the theory of Phillip and Gully (1997) to consider the positive influence between self efficacy and innovative behavior of teachers (innovative work behavior), as well as the theory of Mayer and Davis (1995) to consider the positive effect of trust in leadership (trust toward the leader) on behavior innovative teachers (innovative work behavior. To measure self efficacy, this study used an instrument developed by Bandura (1997). To measure trust toward the leader, this study used an instrument developed by Meyer and Allen (1991). Instrument testing was done by using the validity testing corrected item-total correlation, and reliability testing Cronbachs Alpa. These results support the hypothesis that self efficacy has positive influence on innovative behavior of teachers (innovative work behavior), as well as confidence in the leadership hypothesis (trust toward leader) positive effect on teachers' innovative work behavior (innovative work behavior).

Keywords


Self-efficacy, trust toward the leader, Innovative work behavior

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ancok, D. 2012. Psikologi Kepemimpinan & Inovasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bandura, A. 1994. “Self-efficacy”. Avaible (online):

Https://www.Emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/effbook4.html (18 mei 2006)

Bandura, A. (1997), Self Efficacy: The Exercise Of Control, New York, W.H. Freeman

and Company

Colquitt, J. A. Scott, B. A., & Lepine, J. A. 2007. “Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust

Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk

Taking and Job Performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology: 92 (4), 909-927.

Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. 1996.” The organizational trust inventory (OTI):

Development and validation”: dalam R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust

in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, pp. 302–330. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Damirch, V. Q., Rahmini, G., dan Seyyedi, M. H. 2011. ”Transformational Leadership

Style and Innovation Behavior oon Innovative Climate at SMES in Iran”.

Kuawait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Bussines and Management Review

(12): 119-127.

De Jong, J. P. 2007. Individual Innovation. Amsterdam. Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Dorenbosch, L, Van Engen, M.L., Verhagen, M, (2005), On the Job Innovation: the

impact of job design and human resources management through production

ownership, Creativity and innovation management, vol: 14,2:129-141.

Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. 2009. The innovator’s DNA.

Harvard Business Review, December: 60-67.

Engko, Cecilia, 2008, “Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Individual

Dengan Self Esteem dan Self Efficacy Sebagai Variabel Intervening”, Jurnal

Bisnis Dan Akuntansi Universitas Pattimura.

Hamanik, Oemar. 2007. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.

Handoko, T. H. 2012.” Inovasi dan Kepemimpinan.” dalam : T. Hani Handoko, Nurul

Indarti dan Rangga Almahendra (Eds.). Manajemen Dalam Berbagai

Prespektif. pp 273-283. Yogyakarta. Erlangga.

Hon, A. H. Y., Lu, L. 2010. “The mediating role of trust between expatriate procedural

justice and employee outcomes in Chinese hotel industry”. International

Journal of Hospitality Management 29(2): 669-676.

Janssen, O. 2003. Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness and Innovative

Work Behavior, Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 73

(3), 287-302.

Kreiner, R., Kinicki, A. 200. Organizational Behavior. Mc Graw Hill. 6th Edition.

Lee, J. 2005.” Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment”.

Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26: 655-672.

Luthans, F. 1992. Organizational Behavior. Singapore: McGraw Hill.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective,

continuance, and normative commitment to organization. Journal of

occupational psychology: 63, 1–18.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. 1997.Commitment in the Workplace: Theory Reseach, and

Application. California: Sage Publications.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. 1991. “Athree-Component Conceptualization of

Organizational Commitment”. Human Resource Management Review: 1 (1),

-89.

Miner, J. B. 1992. Industrial Organizational Psychology. Singapore: Mc. Graw Hill.

Phillips, I.M., & Gully.S.M., (1997), The Role of Goal Orientation, ability, need for

avhievement, and Locus of Control in the process, Journal Of Applied

Psychology, 82 (5), 792-802

Robbins, S. P. 2011. Organizational Behavior. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall International.

Inc.

Sagnak, M. 2011. The Empowering Leadership and Teachers’ Innovative Behabior:

The Mediating Role of Innovation Climate. African Journal of Business

Management. 6(4) Februari: 1635 – 1641.

Sarjono, H., & J. Winda. 2011. SPSS VS LISREL: Sebuah Pengantar Aplikasi Untuk

Riset. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A. 1994. Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model

of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, Academy of Management Journal.

(3), 580-607

Sergiovanni, T. J. 1987a. The Principalship: A Reflective Practice

Perspective. Needham Heights, Massachussetts: Allyn’s and Bacon, Inc.

Sergiovanni, T.J., Burlingame, M., Coombs, F.S. and Thurston, P.W.

b. Educational Governance and Administration. 2nd. Ed. Englewood

Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Shah, M.J., Musawwir, R., Gulnaz, A,. Huma, Z., Adnan, R. Job Satisfaction and

Motivation of Teacher of Public Educational Institutions. International

Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol 3 No 8.

Shaw, Robert B., Trust in The Balance: Building Successful Organization on Result

Integrity, and Concern, Jossey-Bass, Inc, California

Shamir, B., House, R. J., Arthur M. B. 1993. “The motivational effects of charismatic

leadership: a self-concept based theory”. Organizational Scienc 4: 577-594.

Sugiyono. 2012.Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfa Beta.

Yuan, F., Woodman, R. W. 2002. Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of

Performance and Image Outcome Expectations, Academy of Management

Journal, 53 (2), 323-342.

Van de ven, A.H.,(1986), Measuring And Assessing Organizations, Wiley : New York.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/exero.v4i1.5024

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 EXERO : Journal of Research in Business and Economics