Email this article 
THE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY FRAMEWORK IN ONLINE ENGLISH LEARNING: INSIGHTS FROM INDONESIAN CULTURAL CONTEXTS
(1) Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Indonesia
(3) Seattle Pacific University, United States
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research is grounded in the theoretical foundation of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework, exploring its application within the context of Indonesian cultural values in English education. The objective of this case study is to examine how English instructors adapt their teaching strategies to the challenges of online learning. The research design employs a qualitative approach, centered on interviews with three instructors from an English department at a private university in Jakarta. The participants, representing a small but focused population, were selected through a reputational purposive sampling technique, based on nominations from students who identified them for their effectiveness and expertise in online English learning. Data collection involved in-depth interviews, providing insights into the instructors’ perspectives and experiences. The analysis involved a thematic examination of teaching, cognitive, and social presence in the CoI framework. Findings show a robust teaching presence and a significant cognitive presence. Notably, social presence, crucial to CoI, subtly aligns with Indonesian hierarchical culture. This study underlines the complex relationship between CoI and cultural factors in online education. It suggests incorporating pedagogies aligned with local cultural values to improve engagement and outcomes in Indonesian online English learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akay, S., Gültekin, K., Şafak, E., Çakir, S., & Aysegul, L. K. (2021). The perceptions of English preparatory school instructors on online education through the community of inquiry in the COVID-19 process. EDEN Conference Proceedings, 524–561. https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2021-ac0052.
Akbulut, M. S., Umutlu, D., Oner, D., & Arikan, S. (2022). Exploring university students’ learning experiences in the COVID-19 semester through the community of inquiry framework. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1050334
Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Online Learning, 5(2), 1-17. http://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Díaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Ardi, P., & Rianita, E. (2022). Leveraging gamification into EFL grammar class to boost student engagement. Teaching English with Technology, 22(2), 90–114. https://tewtjournal.org/download/leveraging-gamification-into-efl-grammar-class-to-boost-student-engagement-by-priyatno-ardi-and-elvira-rianita/
Aslan, A. (2021). The evaluation of collaborative synchronous learning environment within the framework of interaction and community of inquiry: An experimental study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021269326
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi.http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cakiroglu, U. (2020). Community of inquiry in web conferencing: Relationships between cognitive presence and academic achievements. Open Praxis, 11(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.767497790476183
Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 Years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Cleveland-Innes, M.F., Ally, M., Wark, N., & Fung, T. (2013). Emotional presence and mobile learning: Learner-driven responses in a wireless world. The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 16(2), 106–117. https://old.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&inum=5&article=623
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234
Cleveland-Innes, M., Gauvreau, S., Richardson, G., Mishra, S., & Ostashewski, N. (2019). Benefits and challenges of technology-enabled learning using the community of inquiry theoretical framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du e-Learning et La Formation à Distance, 34(1), 1-18. https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1108
Damm, C.A.V. (2016). Applying a community of inquiry instrument to measure student engagement in large online courses. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3(1), 138-172. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol3/iss1/9
Ebersole, E., Shea, M., Rasikawati, I., & Wicks, D. (under review). Using the community of inquiry framework to examine online teaching in two HEIs in the United States and Indonesia.
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Fox, E. (2018). Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818812628
Garrison, R. D. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers, Berg, G. A., Boettcher, J. V., Howard, C., Justice, L., & Schenk, K. D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed., pp. 352-355). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Garrison, R. D. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Garrison, R. D. (2022). Shared metacognition in a community of inquiry. Online Learning, 26(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, R. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Gogus, A. (2023). Adaptation of activity theory framework for effective online learning experiences: Bringing cognitive presence with teaching and social presences in online courses. Online Learning, 27(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3073
Goh, L. H. (2020). The gathering of the community of inquiry in online learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(7), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.7.1413
Guo, P., Saab, N., Wu, L., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The community of inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12586
Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2017). Type and degree of co-occurrence of the educational communication in a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(1), 62–71.http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1114498
Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2020). Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of categories within each presence. Computers & Education, 145, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103712
Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. Internet Higher Education, 41, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
Jiang, M., & Koo, K. (2020). Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students. Online Learning, 24(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307
Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
Junus, K., Santoso, H.B., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Experiencing the community of inquiry framework using asynchronous online role-playing in computer-aided instruction class. Education and Information Technology, 27, 2283–2309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10670-5
Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., Sadita, L., R-Suradijono, S. H., & Suhartanto, H. (2017). The community of inquiry model training for beginners: Patterns of interaction and student learning strategies. 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467110
Lee, R., Hoe Looi, K., Faulkner, M., & Neale, L. (2020). The moderating influence of environment factors in an extended community of inquiry model of e-learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032
Majeski, R. A., Stover, M., & Valais, T. (2018). The community of inquiry and emotional presence. Adult Learning, 29(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159518758696
Masjaya, M., Sardjono, M.A., Paramita, S., & Rahmadi, A. (2020, September 14). Higher education transformation in Indonesia during COVID-19 pandemic: Implementation in Mulawarman University.https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fjm4q
Rachman, A.N., Maghfroh, A., Mustikawati, D., Indriastuti, N. (2021). Community of Inquiry for students’ autonomy in English language learning: A case of Philippines high school. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 61–72. http://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.849
Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
Swan, K. (2019). Social construction of knowledge and the community of inquiry framework. In I. Jung (Ed.), Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 57–65). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_7
Tan, C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student learning performance from the perspectives of community of inquiry. Corporate Governance, 21(6), 1215–1228. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-09-2020-0419
Wahyuningsih, I., Herawati, H., & Prabandari, C. (2023). Students’ perceptions of the use of google docs for online collaborative writing. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 770–783. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6142
Williams, L. S. (2017). The managed heart: Adult learners and emotional presence online. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 124–131, https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1320204
Wicks, D., Craft, B. B., Lee, D., Lumpe, A., Henrikson, R., Baliram, N., Bian, X., Mehlberg, S., & Wicks, K. (2015). An evaluation of low versus high collaboration in online learning. Online Learning Journal, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.552
Yandra, F. P., Alsolami, B., Sopacua, I. O., & Prajogo, W. (2021). The role of community of inquiry and self-efficacy on accounting students’ satisfaction in online learning environment. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol25.iss1.art1
Yang, L., & Mohd, R. B. S. (2020). The relationship between critical thinking and the community of inquiry model: A quantitative study among EFL university students in China. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1814359
Yuyun, I. (2023). Investigating university student engagement in online learning: A case study in EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 634-653. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.46035
Zgheib, G., Salloum, S., & Azar, M. (2023). Cognitive presence as a catalyst for creating a community of inquiry in online learning: Insights from a Lebanese higher education context. In A. Badran, E. Baydoun, S. Hillman, & J. Mesmar (Eds.), Higher education in the Arab world: E-learning and distance education (pp. 319–351). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33568-6_16
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.7958
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ira Rasikawati, Ignasia Yuyun, David Wicks
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...
Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.