FOUR MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF ENGLISH PRAGMATICS

Manna Dey Dey(1*),

(1) North South University, Bangladesh and University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Pragmatics is a linguistic field that explores the complex relationship between language, context, and meaning. It involves analyzing how speakers and writers use language to convey not only literal information, but also social, cultural, and emotional cues that shape communication. Pragmatics examines how language users interpret and infer meaning based on contextual factors such as tone, gesture, and social norms, and how they use language to achieve various goals and outcomes. By uncovering the hidden meanings and intentions behind language use, pragmatics provides valuable insights into human communication and helps us to better understand how language shapes our social interactions and relationships Furthermore, pragmatics plays a crucial role in language learning and teaching, as it helps learners develop their communicative competence and understand the nuances of language use in different contexts. It also has practical applications in fields such as advertising, politics, and law, where the use of language can have significant impacts on audience perceptions and behaviors. Overall, pragmatics is a dynamic and multifaceted field that continues to evolve and shape our understanding of language and communication in diverse contexts. 


Keywords


deixis, maxims, negative face, politeness, positive face, speech act

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arundale, R. B. (2010). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1), 1-33.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dey, M. (2021). Psychological processes in language learning and teaching: Scoping review and future research directions. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 3(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.321532021

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Types of lexical information. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 233-265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New Yok: Academic Press.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845722

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Huang, Y., & Yan, M. (2016). Pragmatics. In K. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 415-430). Oxford: Oxford University Press..

Ide, S. (2017). Face, im/politeness and negotiation of identities. Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 107-115.

Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.

Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, Y. J., & Lee, D. (2019). Social media, face, and the visibility paradox: Investigating face-threatening acts on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 174-181.

Krippendorff, K. (1986). A semantic analysis of visual communication. In E. Wartella (Ed.), Children communicating: Media and development of thought, speech, understanding (pp. 77-97). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nguyen, T. T. (2017). The impact of technology on face and facework in intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 10(2), 152-169.

Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York: Academic Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz & P. K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197-213). New York: New York University Press

Vanderveken, D. (2014). Speech act theory. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 361-366). Oxford: Elsevier.

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6202

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Manna Dey Dey

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.