Email this article 
METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN MEDIATING EFL ADULT LEARNERS’ SELF-REGULATED LANGUAGE LEARNING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Although many studies focus on enhancing resource assistance and the advancement of adult learners' knowledge and abilities, there is a paucity of studies on the theoretical views that define strategies for assisting adults in learning independently. To fill this gap, this study draws on previous research to elaborate on why metacognitive strategies are suitable for adults’ self-regulated learning (SRL), and how metacognitive strategies promote SRL. As this study employed a systematic review, a rigorous search scheme was implemented across multiple databases, resulting in the selection of relevant studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected articles were assessed for quality, and data extraction was performed to identify key characteristics of the studies. The synthesis of the existing literature underscores the suitability of metacognitive strategies in EFL adult learners' self-regulated learning. The findings reveal that incorporating metacognitive strategies helps cultivate SRL in EFL adult learners, owing to their cognitive maturity, pre-existing knowledge, and life experiences. In addition, the metacognitive strategy helps EFL adult learners enhance their awareness of cognitive processes, regulate learning behaviours, and optimize language learning outcomes. Regarding the role, metacognitive strategy is one of the key components of SRL. Some practical recommendations are made to support teachers in facilitating adults’ self-regulated language learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adagideli, F. H., Saraç, S., & Ader, E. (2017). Assessing preschool teachers’ practices to promote self-regulated learning. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 423–440.
Akamatsu, D., Nakaya, M., & Koizumi, R. (2019). Effects of metacognitive strategies on the self-regulated learning process: The mediating effects of self-efficacy. Behavioral Sciences, 9(12), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9120128
Amini, D., Anhari, M. H., & Ghasemzadeh, A. (2020). Modeling the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness, self-regulation and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787018
Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (2013). Metacognition and learning technologies: An overview of current interdisciplinary research. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (Vol. 28, pp. 1–16). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_1
Berger, J.-L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2016). Construct validity of self-reported metacognitive learning strategies. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1127751
Bolan, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (2017). Doing a systematic review: A student’s guide (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Bryce, D., Whitebread, D., & Szűcs, D. (2015). The relationships among executive functions, metacognitive skills and educational achievement in 5 and 7 year-old children. Metacognition and Learning, 10(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9120-4
Butler, D. L., & Schnellert, L. (2012). Collaborative inquiry in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.009
Butler, D., Schnellert, L., & Perry, N. E. (2017). Developing self-regulating learners. Don Mills, ON: Pearson Canada Inc.
Cabrera-Solano, P. (2019). Using visual vocabulary app as a metacognitive strategy in EFL learning: A case of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.17
Chen, J. C. (2014). Teaching nontraditional adult students: Adult learning theories in practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860101
Chou, M. H. (2017). A task-based language teaching approach to developing metacognitive strategies for listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 31(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1098542
Coertjens, L. (2018). The relation between cognitive and metacognitive processing: Building bridges between the SRL, MDL, and SAL domains. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12214
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
Dökmecioğlu, B., Tas, Y., & Yerdelen, S. (2022). Predicting students’ critical thinking dispositions in science through their perceptions of constructivist learning environments and metacognitive self-regulation strategies: A mediation analysis. Educational Studies, 48(6), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1833838
Dörr, L., & Perels, F. (2019). Improving metacognitive abilities as an important prerequisite for self-regulated learning in preschool children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(5), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019553341
Dörrenbächer, L., & Perels, F. (2015). Volition completes the puzzle: Development and evaluation of an integrative trait model of self-regulated learning. Frontline Learning Research, 3(4), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i4.179
Efklides, A., & Metallidou, P. (2020). Applying metacognition and self-regulated learning in the classroom. In L. Zhang (ed.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of educational psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.961
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication (pp. 35–60). New York: Academic Press.
Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9079-2
Freeman, E. E., Karayanidis, F., & Chalmers, K. A. (2017). Metacognitive monitoring of working memory performance and its relationship to academic achievement in grade 4 children. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.06.003
Harputlu, L., & Ceylan, E. (2014). The effects of motivation and metacognitive strategy use on EFL listening proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.056
Heaysman, O., & Kramarski, B. (2022). Enhancing students’ metacognition, achievement and transfer between domains: Effects of the simulative “SRL-AIDE” parallel teacher–student program. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102074
Karlen, Y. (2016). Differences in students’ metacognitive strategy knowledge, motivation, and strategy use: A typology of self-regulated learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.942895
Kellenberg, F., Schmidt, J., & Werner, C. (2017). The adult learner: Self-determined, self-regulated, and reflective. Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology “Signum Temporis,” 9(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/sigtem-2017-0001
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Adult Education.
Knowles, M. S., Holton Iii, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner (6th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080481913
Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.436
Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2015). Improving students’ science text comprehension through metacognitive self-regulation when applying learning strategies. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 313–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9130-2
López-Illescas, C., De Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001
Maftoon, P., & Alamdari, E. F. (2020). Exploring the effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening performance through a process-based approach. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1250632
Marboot, K., Roohani, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2020). Investigating Iranian EFL students’ metacognitive online reading strategies, critical thinking, and their relationship: A mixed-methods study. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1). 151-182. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2020.50833.475
Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (Eds.). (2014). Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315805733
McDowell, L. D. (2019). The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: A review of empirical studies. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2524–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584
Mekala, S., & Radhakrishnan, G. (2019). Promoting self-regulated learning through metacognitive strategies. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 13(2), 21–27.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3
Misra, D. P., & Ravindran, V. (2021). Systematic reviews: Current perspectives and future directions. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 51(3), 218–220. https://doi.org/10.4997/jrcpe.2021.303
Muijs, D., & Bokhove, C. (2020). Metacognition and self-regulation: Evidence review. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
Nan Cenka, B. A., Santoso, H. B., & Junus, K. (2022). Using the personal learning environment to support self-regulated learning strategies: A systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2120019
Nelken, M. L. (2009). Negotiating classroom process: Lessons from adult learning. Negotiation Journal, 25(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00219.x
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259001100604
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Pitenoee, M. R., Modaberi, A., & Ardestani, E. M. (2017). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive writing strategies on content of the Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 594-600. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.19
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 1-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Qin, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). English as a foreign language writers’ metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments. Journal of Writing Research, 11(2), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.06
Riley, I., Jahan, S., Marshall, A., Walter, C., & Gamble, R. F. (2021). Evaluating verification awareness as a method for assessing adaptation risk. Future Generation Computer Systems, 119, 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.01.034
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1/2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Schuster, C., Stebner, F., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2020). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: An experimental training study. Metacognition and Learning, 15(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09237-5
Shareefa, M., & Moosa, V. (2020). The most-cited educational research publications on differentiated instruction: A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.331
Shih, H. J., & Huang, S. C. (2020). College students’ metacognitive strategy use in an EFL flipped classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 755–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1590420
Stebner, F., Schuster, C., Weber, X.-L., Greiff, S., Leutner, D., & Wirth, J. (2022). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: Effects on strategy application and content knowledge acquisition. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 715–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09322-x
Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. London: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830529
Tauber, S. K., & Ariel, R. (2023). Emerging trends in research on self-regulated learning and implications for education: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030052
Teng, L. S. (2021). Individual differences in self-regulated learning: Exploring the nexus of motivational beliefs, self-efficacy, and SRL strategies in EFL writing. Language Teaching Research, 28(2). 366-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211006881
Teng, M. F. (2022). Effects of cooperative–metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ writing and metacognitive awareness. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1835606
Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal De l’Academie Canadienne De Psychiatrie De L’enfant Et De L’adolescent, 20(1), 57–59.
Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
Vosniadou, S., Darmawan, I., Lawson, M., J., Deur, P. V., Jeffries, D., & Wyra, M. (2021). Beliefs about the self-regulation of learning predict cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic performance in pre-service teachers. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 523–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09258-0
Wallace, M. P., Li, V. M., Huang, T. C., & He, N. C. (2021). Metacognitive strategy use for EFL readers: Differences in gender and reading ability. TESL-EJ, 25(2), 1-22.
Wenden, A. L. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.32
Winne, P. H. (2017). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.) (pp. 36–48). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-3
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Yilmaz, R. M., & Baydas, O. (2017). An examination of undergraduates’ metacognitive strategies in pre-class asynchronous activity in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1547–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9534-1
Zaky, H. (2021). Self-regulation and adult learners: Investigating the factors enhancing deliberate practice in composition classes. International Journal of Curriculum Development and Learning Measurement, 2(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCDLM.2021070104
Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1–15). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_47-1
Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320–353.
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 396(12), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2013.12.010
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.5502
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Renol Aprico Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...
Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.