PROMOTING LEARNER AGENCY AND REFLECTIVE THINKING BY ELIMINATING DIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING

Sahnaz Natasya Fath(1*), Wening Sahayu(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Many researchers have examined the implementation of the promotion method toward the agency principle of multicultural theory. However, little has examined the corrective feedback in promoting the tenet. Given the corrective feedback, the learner will be less used of their reflective thinking to promote themselves as an agent. Therefore, this study aimed to promote learners' agency by eliminating the corrective feedback in writing class and encouraging learners' reflective thinking. Three non-formal intermediate learners writing ability is analyzed in this study. The material given was following the syllabus of the course which is expressing of obligation and prohibition. There were three tasks given in this class. The first task is an individual project, the second is a group project, and the third is an individual project. After the learner finished the task the researcher analyzed the learner's writing improvement by analyzing the frequency and the variation of the lexical used and the grammar detail. Using Primary Trait Scoring, the findings pointed out that the writing ability of the learners improved both lexically and grammatically. Besides, the findings also supported that language produced by the learners is complex, dynamics, and more individual. It is expected that this research could be a consideration for educational stakeholders to select the appropriate method for the learners

Keywords


agency, corrective feedback, multicultural, reflective thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abas, S. (2018). Individual characteritics in second language acquisition. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa, 1(1), 33–49.

Boyd, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167883232011

Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language (2nd Ed.). London: Routledge.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Budianto, S., Mukminatien, N., & Latief, M. (2017). The debate of written corrective feedback: What to do and where to go. KnE Social Sciences. 1(3), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i3.758.

Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 87-95.

Carrio-Pastor, M. (2020). Cross-cultural analysis of English modal constructions in engineering papers. ODISEA, 0(20), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i20.3189

Chen, M. A., Hwang, G., & Chang, Y. (2019). A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288-2307. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12823

Cooke, S. D. (2013). Examining transcription, autonomy and reflective practice in language development. RELC Journal, 44(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473271

Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach writing (6th Ed.). Edinburg Gate: Longman.

Harmer, J. (2001). How to teach English (An Introduction to the Practice of English Language Teaching). Edinburg Gate: Longman.

Jiao, L. (2005). Promoting EFL learner autonomy. Sino-US English Teaching, 17, 27- 30.

Lansford, L. (2014). Authentic materials in the classroom: The advantages. Cambridge university press.

Larsen–Freeman, D. (2012b). The emancipation of the language learner. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 297–309

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14(2-3), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668828

Latifah, Y., Suwarno, B., & Diani, I. (2019). The effect of teachers’ direct and indirect feedback on student’ s writing ability. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 3(2), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v3i2.6846

Li, G. (2020). Principles for developing learner agency in language learning in a new Eduscape with Covid-19. English Language Learning, 5, 30-40.

Nieto, S. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Normah, O. (2006). Assessment of directed writing by a group of TESL student at UPSI. Paper presented at Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idrispator

Pamularsih, W. T. (2017). The effectiveness of group work discussion to improve the students’ competence in writing descriptive text: The case of seventh grade students of SMP N 1 Tegowanu. ETERNAL English Teaching Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v5i1.1965

Tomlinson, B. (2011). Material development in language teaching (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vanijdee, A. (2003). Thai distance English learners and learner autonomy. Open Learning, 18(1), 75-84.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i1.4416

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2022 Sahnaz Natasya Fath

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.