Politeness Strategies Applied by the Characters of The Great Debaters Movie

Miwita Rosari(1*),

(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research explores politeness strategies used by the characters in The Great Debaters movie. The data used in this research were collected from 166 pages of The Great Debaters movie transcription. The analysis is based on Brown and Levinsons politeness strategies and Spolskys factors affecting someones politeness in speaking. The research results showed that the characters in The Great Debaters movie applied the types of politeness strategies, namely off-record, baldon-record, positive politeness, and negative politeness. Moreover, the characters alsorevealed the factors affecting the characters politeness in speaking, namelylanguage style, register and domain, and slang and solidarity. However, the characters did not show language and gender factor in their conversation since they were mostly engaged in the same topic, namely a debate competition.

Keywords


politeness strategies, character, The Great Debaters

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals of language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.

Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (2001). Unfolding discourse and social psychology. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 198-209). London: Sage Publications.

Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as a data: A guide for analysis (pp. 5-48). London: Sage Publications.

Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v19i1.309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Miwita Rosari



Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...


Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding. 

 

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.