EFL TEACHERS AND LEARNERS PERSPECTIVES ON THE PRINCIPLES OF INSTRUCTED LANGUAGE LEARNING: CONFLICT OR CONSENSUS?

Owen Connor, Ahmad Nazari

Abstract


The developmental nature of second language acquisition research has resulted in various and at times seemingly contradictory theories, methods and approaches. In 2005, Rod Ellis published his Principles of Instructed Language Learning, which he considered to be a set of teaching generalisations that could stimulate debate and reflection among teachers in the post-methods era (Richards & Rodgers, 2014). The purpose of this study was to investigate Elliss principles in terms of their perceived relevance and applicability in an adult EFL learning environment. In order to achieve this aim, a mixed methods research approach was utilised. Separate questionnaires were administered to seventy-one students and eight teachers employed in the English Language Department of a Training Institute in Doha, Qatar. Additionally, thirteen students participated in two single sex focus group sessions. The results revealed consensus between students and teachers regarding the importance they placed on some principles, but not others, particularly the contentious issue of meaning vs. form. Furthermore, while both groups emphasised the importance of interaction, many students nonetheless felt uneasy interacting in English with other Arabic speakers. A further key finding was that neither party clearly understood the concept of the learners built-in syllabus. The principal conclusion is that the best way to deal with the aforementioned anomalies involves experimentation with task-based approaches as these allow for a focus on meaning, opportunities for interaction, and a retrospective focus on form via corrective feedback, which takes into account the learners built-in syllabus.

Keywords


Instructed language learning; meaning; form; interaction; built-in syllabus; task-based approaches

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bagheri, M., & Mehrnoush, M. (2013). The application of Elliss principles for effective instructed foreign language learning in Iranian language institutes and high schools. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 2(1), 139-168. Retrieved from http://jslte.iaushiraz.ac.ir/article_522586_d39726b883d311bd557d90bb559e2639.pdf

Berns, M. (1990). Communicative competence in the plural and the teaching of English in non-native contexts. Language Sciences, 12(23), 209219. doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(90)90012-6

Chen, N.S., & Wang, Y. (2008). Testing principles of language learning in a cyber face-to-face environment. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 97-113. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.3.97

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018) Research methods in education (8th Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

Cook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching. New York: Routledge.

Corder, S. (2009). The significance of learners errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 5(1-4), 161-170. doi:10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angles: Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019) Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 23, 1-44. DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2005a) Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209-224. doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006

Ellis, R. (2005b). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www-leland.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Courses/Ed388%20Website/Resources/Instructional%20Resources/Ellis%20Instructed-second-language%20-%20latest%20version.pdf

Ellis, R., Erlam, R., & Sakui, K. (2006). Instructed second language acquisition: Case studies. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.

Ellis, R. (2008). Principles of instructed second language acquisition. CAL Digest, Dec. 2008., 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.actiondyslexia.co.uk/downloads/Principlesofsecondlanguageacquisition.pdf

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Harlow: Longman.

Howard, J., & Millar, S. (2009). The applicability of principles for instructed second language learning: A South Korean perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 11(4), 31-57. Retrieved from https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-journals/the-applicability-of-principles-for-instructed-second-language-learning-a-south-korean-perspective/

Howatt, A. (1984), A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications .

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology. London: Sage Publications.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48. doi:10.2307/3587197

Lantolf, J. (1996). Second language theory building: Letting all the flowers bloom! Language Learning, 46(4), 713-749. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01357.x

Renzetti, C. M., & Lee, R. M. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285-329. doi:10.1017/S0261444818000125

Long, M. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.

McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold.

Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 37-38. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81207788.pdf

ONeill, R. (1994). The myth of the silent teacher. Paper presented at the Annual IATEFL Conference. Retrieved from http://www.tedpower.co.uk/esl0420.html

ONeill, R. (1999). Dogmas and delusions in current EFL methodology. Retrieved from http://www.tedpower.co.uk/esl0416.html

O'Neill, R. (2000). The appeal and poverty of communicative language teaching. The IH Journal of Education and Development, 8, 3-9. Retrieved from http://www.ihworld.com/ihjournal/documents/Issue_8.pdf

Racine, J. R. (2018). Lexical approach. In J. L. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-7). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2016). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 10, 209-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 235-252). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of ouput in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and Practice in Applied Linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thornbury, S. (1998). The lexical approach: A journey without maps? Modern English Teacher 7(4): 7-13. Retrieved from http://nebula.wsimg.com/9129eed8a13130f4ee92cf2c3ce5b13e?AccessKeyId=186A535D1BA4FC995A73&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Willis, D. (1996). Accuracy, fluency and conformity. In J. Willis, & D.Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 44-51). Oxford: Macmillan Heineman.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, S., & Yang, X. (2010). Grammar in language teaching and language learning. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 5(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.1338




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i1.2359

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Owen Connor, Ahmad Nazari



Indexed and abstracted in:

    

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.