VOICE IN ACADEMIC WRITING: THE TRANSPOSITIONING OF AUTHOR IDENTITY IN RESPONDING TO MANUSCRIPT BLIND REVIEWERS

Setiono Sugiharto

doi:10.24071/llt.v28i2.12386

VOICE IN ACADEMIC WRITING: THE TRANSPOSITIONING OF AUTHOR IDENTITY IN RESPONDING TO MANUSCRIPT BLIND REVIEWERS

Setiono Sugiharto^(1*),

(1) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Voice as one of vital elements in academic writing can impinge upon the quality of one’s writing. Despite robust controversies over the usefulness of this metaphorical notion, a plethora of studies on voice has contributed to our understanding of its role in determining writing quality. The foci of these studies, however, are constricted on either voice as individual or voice as social, ignoring the perspective of voice as dialogic. This case study investigates the written reviews of a manuscript author by four blind reviewers in different international Scopus-indexed journals. Drawing on the ideas of “voice as dialogic” and of “transpositioning” of identity, this study seeks to identify and to examine the authorial strategies of an author in constructing his own voice in textual realizations as responses to the manuscript blind reviewers. In doing so, it attempts to finds out the author’s writing identity as manifested in the texts constructed. Relativism’s methodology was employed in order to provide the construction of certain phenomena (i.e. dialogical voice) as accurately as possible. Results revealed that the manuscript author employed two key authorial strategies: averring established authority and foregrounding the ecologies of knowledges.

Keywords

authorial strategies; averring established authority; foregrounding ecologies of knowledge; transpositioning of identity; voice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bauman, Z. (2012). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

Burke, S. B. (2010). The construction of identity in the academic writing of Korean ESL students: A qualitative study of six Korean students in the U.S [An unpublished dissertation]. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 401-417.

Chen, N., & Zhou, C. (2024). Making sense of a new language: Authenticity and semiotics in additional language learning. Language and Semiotic Studies, 10(3), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2024-0021

Guan, J. & Xu, H. (2024). In between the neoliberal reality and the humanities imagination: A narrative inquiry of an English major’s identity construction in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2410384

He, F. (2021). Identity construction in academic writing of student writers who use English as an additional language: A literature review. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 506-524. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2020-0033

Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003). Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.001

Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal,56(4), 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351

Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.220

Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in final year reports. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 134-150). Palgrave Macmillan.

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins.

Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice and self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0

Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2023). Developing multilingual writing: Agency, audience, identity. Springer.

Lee, K., & Ye, Y. (2023). Uncovering the dimensionality of authorial voice in the integrated writing task: A confirmatory factor analysis study. System, 117, Article 103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103115

Lee, J. W., & Jenks, C. (2021). Ideology, identity, and world Englishes: Toward a heteroglossic framework. In R. Rubdy & R. Tupas (Eds.), Bloomsbury world Englishes: Ideologies (Volume 2) (pp. 114-126). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Langum, V., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2020). Academic writing, scholarly identity, voice and the benefits and challenges of multilingualism: Reflections from Norwegian doctoral researchers in teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 60, Article 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100883

Limpariwhattana, K., & Chamcharatsri, B. (2025). Being and becoming: A revealing glimpse of L2 writer identity through metaphors. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2516384. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2516384

Liu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Literature citation and identity construction in linguistic academic discourse. Heliyon, 9(11), Article 22066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22066

Tian, Y., & Liu, D. (2024). A bibliometric study of identity construction in English writing for academic purposes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 149-917. http://10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1499917

Li, A. W. (2024). Bilingual returnee scholars’ identity in academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 64, Article 101112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101112

Li, W., & T.K. Lee. (2024). Transpositioning and the liquidity of identity. Applied Linguistics, 45(5), 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad065

Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9

Matsuda, P. K. (2015). Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000178

Matsuda, P. K., & C.M. Tardy. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001

Mhilli, O. (2023). Authorial voice in writing: A literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8, Article 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100550

Park, J. Y. (2023). Agency, identity, and writing: Perspectives from first generation students of color in their first year of college. Research in the Teaching of English, 57, 227-247. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202332353

Peng, Y. (2024). Exploring L2 graduate writers’ identity construction in research writing practices: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Language and Semiotic Studies, 10(4), 616-637. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2024-0058

Qi, Q., & Zhao, C. G. (2023). Discoursal scholarly identity in research writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 62, Article 101052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101052

Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X

Szundy, P. (2021). Conflicting language ideologies about what counts as “English” in the Brazilian national common core curriculum. In R. Rubdy & R. Tupas (Eds.), Bloomsbury world Englishes: Ideologies (Volume 2) (pp. 213-229). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Silva, T. (2005). On the philosophical bases of inquiry in second language writing: Metaphysic, inquiry paradigm, and the intellectual zeitgeist. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 3-15). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sousa Santos, B. (2018). The end of cognitive empire, the coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press.

Sugiharto, S. (2024a). Ars Erotica: Sex and somaesthetics in the classical arts of love: Exploring Shusterman’s writing identity in the discourse on the art of lovemaking and body aesthetics. Journal of Language and Literature, 24(2), 623-630. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.9700

Sugiharto, S. (2024b). Straddling the personal and the academic: How self in academic writing is constructed in contact zone. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 478-504. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i2.35964

Stapleton, P. (2002). Critiquing voice as a viable pedagogical tool in L2 writing: Returning the spotlight to the ideas. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(3), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00070-X

Tardy, C. (2012). Current conceptions of voice. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 34-48). Palgrave Macmillan.

Wu, Y. (2025). Authorial identity construction through implicit stance-taking in the introduction of research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 78(2), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.12.003

Zeng, X., Liu, J., & Bowen, N. E. (2024). A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing. Assessing Writing, 62(2), Article 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100896

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i2.12386