The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles

Adi Sutrisno(1), Karlina Denistia(2*),

(1) Department of Languages and Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Vocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The ability to effectively use relative clauses is pivotal in English journal articles, as it allows authors the flexibility to modify various noun phrases within sentences to convey clearer and more precise writing. This research explores the strategies employed by Indonesian authors from three distinct disciplines - business, engineering, and science. To accomplish this, we analyzed thirty papers published in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Makara Journal of Science, and Gadjahmada International Journal of Business. In total, 1453 relative clauses were collected and analyzed. A cross-classification analysis was performed to examine the distribution of relative clauses. The findings of the study indicate a preference among Indonesian writers to use non-reduced relative clauses, specifically those that serve as restrictive modifiers for objects. We also observe that the past participle is employed with greater frequency than the present participle. The results reveal that Indonesian authors prefer non-reduced relative clauses over reduced ones, opt for restrictive clauses over non-restrictive ones, and consistently favor relativizing the subject (S-form) in their relative clauses over the object (O-form). Our results also show that the choice of relative clauses is subject-specific, influenced by the distinct communicative requirements and preferences within each field. Our examination of relative clauses has provided insights into the syntactic choices, including their reduction status, restrictiveness, the use of participles, connectors, and the syntactic category modified by the clause.

Keywords


reduced relative clause; non-reduced relative clause; restrictive; non-restrictive; relativizing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdolmanafi, S., & Rahmani, Z. (2012). An investigation of the learnability of relative clauses by EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 2(3), 29–37. DOI: 10.5430/wjel.v2n3p29

Arnon, I., & Priva, U. C. (2013). More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56(3), 349–371. DOI: 10.1177/0023830913484891

Baayen, R. H. (2005). Word frequency distributions. In R. Köhler & G. Altmann (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 397–409). Walter de Gruyter.

Bazerman, C., & Prior, P. A. (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). The Grammar Book. Heinle&Heinle.

Chen, S. W. (2018). A Comparative Study of Relative Clause Use in Chinese and English Academic Writing. Journal of Modern Languages, 28(2), 45–67. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/8653

Cho, D. W., & Lee, K. (2016). English relative clauses in science and engineering journal papers: A comparative corpus-based study for pedagogical purposes. Ampersand, 3, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.03.002

Darus, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483–495.

Denistia, K., & Baayen, H. (2019). The Indonesian prefixes PE- and PEN-: A study in productivity and allomorphy. Morphology, 29(3), 384–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-019-09340-7

Denistia, K., & Baayen, H. (2022). Affix substitution in Indonesian: A computational modeling approach. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 61(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0191

Denistia, K., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Baayen, H. (2022). Exploring semantic differences between the Indonesian prefixes PE- and PEN- using a vector space model. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 18(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2020-0023

Denistia, K., Yuda, J. P., Perwira, Y. K., Sari, I. M., Wulandari, D., & Priyanto, A. D. (2024). Linguistics Aspects of English Slogans in Indonesian Product Brands: An Initial Corpus Study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i3.66939

Deveci, T., & Nunn, R. (2018). The Use of Relative Clauses in Humanities and Social Sciences Research Articles: A Case Study. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(1), 17–26. DOI: 10.13189/lls.2018.060103

Downing, A. (2015). English Grammar: A University Course. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data. The MIT Press.

Gries, S. Th. (2009). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: a practical introduction. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Guffey, M. E. (2013). Business communication: Process & product. Nelson.

Ioup, & A, K. (1977). Interference versus structural complexity in second language acquisition: Language universals as a basis for natural sequencing. In R. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. R. Crymes (Eds.), TESOL 77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice (p. 159e171).

Kafes, H. (2018). The use of relative clauses in Turkish and English: Implications for teaching. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(3), 35–49.

Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). NP accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–100.

Marefat, H., & Rahmany, R. (2009). Acquisition of English relative clauses by Persian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistics Study, 5(2), 21–48.

Master, P. (2002). Relative clause reduction in technical research articles. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 201–231). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mohamed, M. M., & Jared, D. (2024). The distributional properties of prefixes influence lexical decision latencies: Evidence from Malay. The Mental Lexicon, 18(2), 218–264. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00023.maz

Park, C. (2000). The Syntactic Difficulty of Relative Clauses for Korean Students: An Analysis of Errors and Avoidance Strategies [PhD Thesis]. Arizona State University.

Phoocharoensil, S., & Simargool, N. (2010). English relativization and learners’ problems. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 109–129.

Rajeg, G. P. W., Denistia, K., & Rajeg, I. M. (2018). Working with a linguistic corpus using R: An introductory note with Indonesian negating construction. Linguistik Indonesia, 36(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v36i1.71

Rajeg, G. P. W., & Rajeg, I. M. (2023). Exploring diachronic salience of emotion metaphors: A contrastive study of happiness metaphors in Classical Malay and Indonesian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00133.raj

Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. J. Verbal Learn: Verbal Betawi. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(3), 272–281.

Supriyanto, B. (2007). Reduksi Klausa Relatif Restriktif Lengkap dalam Bahasa Inggris dan Padanannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 12(6), 309–326.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. University of Michigan Press.

Tian, S., & Baayen, R. H. (2022). Productivity and semantic transparency. The Mental Lexicon, 17(3), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22009.she

Tomaschek, F., Arnold, D., Bröker, F., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Lexical frequency co-determines the speed-curvature relation in articulation. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.02.003

Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2010). Claiming a territory: Relative clauses in journal descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1880–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.025

Wiechmann, D. (2015). Understanding relative clauses: A usage-based view on the processing of complex constructions. De Gruyter.

Wong, J. (1991). Learnability of relative clause: A Hongkong Case. Perspectives, 3(1), 108–117.

Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (1991). Relative complexity: Beyond avoidance. CUHK Papers in Linguistics, 3, 112–124.

Zhang, Y. (2020). The Use of Relative Clauses in Chinese and English: A Comparative Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 578–589.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.9097

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by  Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.

JOLL is indexed in:

       


This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats