Thematic and Rhematic Progression in Scientific Writing: A Pilot Study

Alvin Ping Leong

doi:10.24071/joll.v22i1.4117

Thematic and Rhematic Progression in Scientific Writing: A Pilot Study

Alvin Ping Leong^(1*),

(1) Nanyang Technological University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The Hallidayan Theme-Rheme framework is commonly used to account for the message structure of language. Much has been done to investigate the message structure of different text types using the Hallidayan framework and Daneš’s notion of thematic progression (TP). Similar studies targeting scientific research articles, however, are few, and the Rhemes in these studies are almost always sidelined. Diagrams capturing the development patterns of Themes and Rhemes at the whole-text level are also lacking. To address these gaps, this study compared the TP and rhematic progression (RP) patterns of 50 scientific research articles, adopting both a diagrammatic and quantitative approach. The quantification of TP and RP was based on the thematic-density index (TDI) and rhematic-density index (RDI), respectively. The results revealed that TDI was greater than RDI at all levels of the text. The TP and RP patterns were also different and distinct. Whereas the TP pattern comprised a simple-linear progression in the introduction section followed by a constant development in the rest of the article, the RP pattern was generally simple-linear in its shape. The observed TP and RP patterns capture not merely the message structure of scientific writing, but its communicative function. Further work involving more varied scientific texts is recommended to investigate whether these patterns are robust across disciplines.

Keywords

rhematic progression; Rheme; scientific writing; thematic progression; Theme

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alley, M. (2018). The craft of scientific writing (4 ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Banks, D. (2017). The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985–2015. Functional Linguistics, 4(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: Strategies and steps. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Approaching the ‘Reward Triangle’: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgements and ‘peer interactive communication’ in scientific publications. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/18648

Cronin, B., Mckenzie, G., & Stiffler, M. (1992). Patterns of acknowledgement. Journal of Documentation, 48(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026893

Daneš, F. (1970). One instance of Prague School methodology: Functional analysis of utterance and text. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), Method and theory in linguistics (pp. 132–140). The Hague: Mouton.

Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). The Hague: Mouton.

Darabad, A. M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379

Dimković-Telebaković, G. (2012). Genre analysis: Changes in research article introductions. In H. Sauer & G. Waxenberger (Eds.), English historical linguistics 2008 (Volume II: Words, texts and genres) (pp. 255–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ding, D. D. (1998). Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientific discourse. In J. T. Battalio (Ed.), Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy (pp. 117–135). Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Dubois, B. L. (1987). A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text, 7(2), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1987.7.2.89

Enkvist, N. E. (1974). Theme dynamics and style: An experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 5, 127–135. http://ifa.amu.edu.pl/sap/files/5/12_enkvist.pdf

Fries, P. H., & Francis, G. (1992). Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 6, 45–59.

Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E., & Reidy, M. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613

Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 3). Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 179–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001882

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp. 140–165). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2 ed.). London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4 ed.). London: Routledge.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Katz, S. M., & Odell, L. (2013). Something old, something new: Integrating presentation software into the “writing” course. In T. Bowen & C. Whithaus (Eds.), Multimodal literacies and emerging genres (pp. 90–110). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Khaldoyanidi, A., & Morel, M.-A. (2013). Syntactic properties of the rheme in Russian. Foreign Language Teaching, 40(1), 9–26.

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Leong, P. A. (2014). The passive voice in scientific writing: The current norm in science journals. Journal of Science Communication, 13(1), A03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13010203

Leong, P. A. (2015). Topical themes and thematic progression: The ‘picture’ of research articles. Text & Talk, 35(3), 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0001

Leong, P. A. (2016). Thematic density of research-article abstracts: A systemic-functional account. Word, 62(4), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2016.1248668

Leong, P. A. (2019). Visualizing texts: A tool for generating thematic-progression diagrams. Functional Linguistics, 6, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-019-0069-0

Leong, P. A., Toh, A. L. L., & Chin, S. F. (2018). Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written Communication, 35(3), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318767378

Liubov, K. A. (2011). The use of the grammatical category of indefiniteness for the pre-positional subject-rheme identification. Tomsk State University Journal, 343, 27–29. http://journals.tsu.ru//vestnik/en/&journal_page=archive&id=856&article_id=6746

Martínez, I. A. (2005). Native and non-native writers' use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001

McCabe, A. M. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts [Doctoral thesis, Aston University].

Nature. (2020). How to write your paper. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/for-authors/write

Nwogu, K. N., & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 369–384). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Rivers, N. A. (2008). Some assembly required: The Latourian collective and the banal work of technical and professional communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.38.3.b

Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: Aston University.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Udilova, D. (2009). Functions of rheme in the beginning of a sentence in modern Swedish. Skandinavskaya Filologiya, 10, 210–217. http://scandphil.spbu.ru/en/issues/2009-issues/issue-10/functions-of-rheme-in-the-beginning-of-a-sentence-in-modern-swedish/

Viti, C. (2008). Rheme before theme in the noun phrase: A case study from Ancient Greek. Studies in Language, 32(4), 894–915. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.4.05vit

Williams, I. A. (1999). Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00003-9

Williams, I. A. (2009). Discourse style and theme–rheme progression in biomedical research article discussions. Languages in Contrast, 9(2), 225–266. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.9.2.03wil

Yates, S. J., Williams, N., & Dujardin, A.-F. (2005). Writing geology: Key communication competencies for geoscience. Planet, 15(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2005.00150036

Zaiontz, C. (2020). Real statistics using Excel. Retrieved 14 December 2020 from http://www.real-statistics.com/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i1.4117