Deontic Obligations in Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies in Tertiary Institutions: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse  Approach

Bernard Ayine; Cornelius Fuumaale Suom-Kogle; Benjamin Amoakohene; Osei Yaw Akoto

doi:10.24071/joll.v25i2.12372

Deontic Obligations in Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies in Tertiary Institutions: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Approach

Bernard Ayine⁽¹⁾, Cornelius Fuumaale Suom-Kogle⁽²⁾, Benjamin Amoakohene^(3*), Osei Yaw Akoto⁽⁴⁾,

(1) The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
(2) Michigan Technological University
(3) University of Health and Allied Sciences
(4) Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Sexual harassment in higher education is a pervasive issue that carries serious implications for both institutional reputation and the well-being of victims. To address this, universities have developed anti-sexual harassment policies to guide in managing such incidents. However, the language of these documents can sometimes hinder victims’ willingness to report perpetrators. This study examined the use of deontic modalities in the anti-sexual harassment policies of three major Ghanaian universities: the University of Ghana, the University of Cape Coast, and the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. The dataset comprised three official policy documents totaling 21219 tokens and 2675 word types, which were compiled into a specialized corpus. Using LancsBox software, we categorised the modal verbs into three deontic obligations (necessity, advisability, and possibility) and analyzed them from both institutional and victim/complainant perspectives. The findings revealed the presence of 580 modal verbs across the corpus. Deontic necessity was the most prominent, accounting for 55% of occurrences, followed by possibility (33.1%) and advisability (11.9%). Within the context of deontic necessity, institutional perspectives dominated (84.6%), framing universities as the primary agents of responsibility in combating sexual harassment, while victim/complainant perspectives were less emphasized (15.4%). Possibility and advisability were used more flexibly, offering discretionary or optional courses of action, though these too were largely framed from the institutional standpoint. By demonstrating the dominance of institutional responsibility and the limited framing of victims’ agency, this study highlights how policy language shapes institutional responses and reporting behavior. These findings contribute to the understanding of how linguistic choices in legal-institutional discourse influence power relations and victim engagement.

Keywords

sexual harassment; modality; obligation; possibility; necessity; advisability

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agyepong, F., Opare, J. A., Owusu-Banahene, N. O., & Yarquah, J. A. (2011). The typology and magnitude of sexual harassment of female students in Ghanaian senior high schools. Research in Education, 86(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.86.6

Anton, C. M. (2015). The effects of persuasive communication on knowledge and attitudinal outcomes of a sexual harassment training program. Social Psychology, 16, 117–128.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford.

Bázlik, M., & Ambrus, P. (2009). Legal English and its Grammatical Structure. Wolters Kluwer Česká Republika.

Bedu, A. M. (2017). Semantico-pragmatic interrelation of editorials and their headlines in English-speaking Nigerian newspapers. https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/263980

Bedu, A. M., & Askira, M. G. (2023). On some pragmatic functions of modality in Hausa newspaper discourse. Inquiry in African Languages and Literatures,16, 46–56.

Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes, 4, 3–19.

Boginskaya, O. (2022). A corpus-based study of deontic modality in legal discourse. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jeziki jezikoslovlje, 48(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.48.1.1

Bondestam, F., & Lundqvist, M. (2020). Sexual harassment in higher education–a systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1729833

Bonsu, E. M., Afful, J. B. A., & Hu, G. (2023). A corpus-based genre analysis of letters of regularization: The case of land institutions in Ghana. Ibérica, 45, 215–241. doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.45.215

Brezina, V. & Platt, W. (2025) #LancsBox X [software], Lancaster University, http://lancsbox.lancs.ac.uk.

Brown, C. S., Biefeld, S. D., & Bulin, J. (2023). High school policies about sexual harassment: What’s on the books and what students think. Journal of Social Issues, 79(4), 1411–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12505

Cantalupo, N. C., & Kidder, W. C. (2018). A systematic look at a serial problem: Sexual harassment of students by university faculty. Utah Law Review,3,1–117. https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2018/iss3/4

Carr, J. (2017). Deontic modals. In The Routledge handbook of metaethics (pp. 194–210). Routledge.

Carrera-Fernandez, M. J., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Pero-Cebollero, M. (2013). Qualitative research in psychology: Misunderstandings about textual analysis. Quality & Quantity, 47, 1589–1603. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11135-011-9611-1

Cooper, P. K. (2011). Is there a case for the abolition of ‘shall’ from EU legislation? Riga: Riga Graduate School of Law, 1–92

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th Ed.). Sage.

Cruse, A. (2004). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Mitthögskolan.

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2009). “Words must be our force”: Exploring modality markers in political speeches. Topics in Linguistics, 4, 13–19.

Doodaa, V., Osei-Owusu, B., Kyei, E., Eshun, I., & Esther, O. (2022). Sexual harassment against female students in senior high schools in the Techiman Municipality of Bono East Region of Ghana. American Academic Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 86(1), 131–142.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Routledge

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Polity

Famina, N. V., & Osminkin, A. I. (2022). Modality in legal discourse. must, can, may, will and shall: Between obligation and permission. Современное педагогическое образование, 4, 251–265.

Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English (Doctoral Dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.

Jacobson, R. K., & Eaton, A. (2017). How organizational policies influence bystanders likelihood of reporting moderate and severe sexual harassment at work. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 30, 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-017-9309-1

Konlan, K. D., & Dangah, M. M. (2023). Students’ experiences of sexual harassment: A descriptive cross-sectional study in a college of education, Ghana. Heliyon, 9(4).

Krapivkina, O. A. (2017). Semantics of the verb shall in legal discourse. Jezikoslovlje, 18(2), 305–317.

Kravchenko, N., Pasternak, T., & Korotka, S. (2021). Deontic modality in epideictic discourse: Speech acts facet (based on COVID-associated texts). Cogito,13(2), 167–184.

Jaworska, S. (2016). Using a corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) approach to investigate constructions of identities in media reporting surrounding mega sports events: The case of the London Olympics 2012. In Critical event studies: Approaches to research (pp. 149-174). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Lillian, D. L. (2008). Modality, persuasion and manipulation in Canadian conservative discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 2(1),1–16. http://cadaad.org/ejournal

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Nartey, M., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2019). Towards a decade of synergising corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: a meta-analysis. Corpora, 14(2), 203-235.

Nielsen, M. B. D., Kjær, S., Aldrich, P. T., Madsen, I. E., Friborg, M. K., Rugulies, R., & Folker, A. P. (2017). Sexual harassment in care work–dilemmas and consequences: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 70,122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.018

Ninan, D. (2005). Two puzzles about deontic necessity. In J. Gajewski, V. Hacquard, B. Nickel, & S. Yalcin (Eds), New Work on Modality (pp.1–27). http://web.mit.edu/dninan/www/

Norman, I. D., Aikins, M., & Binka, F. (2012). Traditional and contrapower sexual harassment in public universities and professional training institutes of Ghana. International Journal of Academy Research, 4, 85–95.

Norman, I. D., Aikins, M., & Binka, F. N. (2013). Sexual harassment in public medical schools in Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal, 47(3), 128-136.

Nyarko Adu, I., Duoduaa Nyarko-Tetteh, A., & Kyei-Frimpong, M. (2024). Uncovering the untold story: Exploring gender disparities in sexual harassment experiences and coping strategies among Ghanaian higher education students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(3), 862-874.

Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139167178

Palmer, F. R. (2007). Mood and Modality. World Book Publishing Company.

Palmer, F. R. (2013). Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Partington, A. S. (2014). Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International journal of corpus linguistics, 19(1), 118-146.

Rani, N. S. A., Ibrahim, N. A. N., Zahrawaani, N., Jasmin, S. A. W., & Bakar, M. H. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of the use of modal verbs in former prime minister's Speech during COVID-19. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7), 106–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i7/14008

Saeed, J. L. (2003). Semantics (2nd ed). Blackwell Publishing.

Sagrestano, L. M., Ormerod, A. J., & DeBlaere, C. (2019). Peer sexual harassment predicts African American girls’ psychological distress and sexual experimentation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 492–499. doi: 10.1177/0165025419870292

Sambrook, J., & Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (3rd ed.). CSHL Press.

Schneider, J., Whitehead, D., & Elliot, D. (2009). Nursing and Midwifery (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.

Stamatović, M. V. (2016). Scaling deontic modality in parliamentary discourse. Logos et Littera: Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 2(3), 131–149.

Sualihu, W., Zakaria, M., & Owusu, V. (2024). Sexual harassment in Ghanaian tertiary institutions: Reality or perception. Universal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 74–88. https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/ujssh/article/view/1085

Tavares, P., & Wodon, Q. (2018). Ending violence against women and girls: Global and regional trends in women’s legal protection against domestic violence and sexual harassment (Ending Violence Against Women Notes Series). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Taylor, C. (2014). Investigating the representation of migrants in the UK and Italian press: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse analysis. International journal of corpus linguistics, 19(3), 368-400.

Van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79.

van Dijk, T., A. (2001). Multidisciplinary Critical Discourse Analysis: A plea for diversity. In R.Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage

Van Linden, A., & Verstraete, J. (2010). Revisiting deontic modality and related categories: A conceptual map based on the study of English modal adjectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.031

Wang, Z., Fan, W., & Fang, A. C. (2022). Lexical input in the grammatical expression of stance: A collexeme analysis of the introductory it pattern. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762000

Warchał, K. (2015). Certainty and doubt in academic discourse: Epistemic modality markers in English and Polish linguistics articles. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

Winiharti, M. (2012). The difference between modal verbs in deontic and epistemic modality. Humaniora, 3(2), 532–539.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.) Methods of critical discourse analysis, pp. 1-33, London: SAGE.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v25i2.12372