Wisdom and its Implication in the Priestly Formation Context

Erwin Sasmito

doi:10.24071/jaot.v3i1.3225

Wisdom and its Implication in the Priestly Formation Context

Erwin Sasmito

Abstract

Wisdom is defined in a variety of meanings in accordance with the times. Understanding wisdom originated from philosophical approaches. After these philosophical views, wisdom is understood in the psychology context. Wisdom has received increasing attention in empirical research in recent years, especially in gerontology and psychology. Wisdom generally is associated with older people. Modern empirical research has no significant reason to believe that wisdom is solely owned by older people. Wisdom is not a result of aging per se, but rather, only those older people who use their lifetime experiences optimally tend to acquire wisdom with aging. In this paper, wisdom is defined as human’s multidimensional abilities which can be learned and measured, and increases with age through advanced cognitive and emotional development which is driven by experience. Multidimensionality of wisdom (e.g. practical, reflective, openness interactional, paradoxical, ethical sensibility and experience) shows that wisdom is not always related with older age, but refers to the individual’s abilities to reason carefully; to reminisce and reflect; to tolerate with alternative views; and to regulate own emotional and expressions). The definitions lead to the implication that family and seminary formation have chance to develop the wisdom as human’s multidimensional abilities.

Keywords

wisdom; ability; reflective, ethical sensibility, human development, priestly formation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ardelt, M. “Development and empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale”. Research on Aging, 25, (2003), 275–324. doi:10.1177/0164027503025003004.

Ardelt, M. “Intellectual versus wisdom-related knowledge: The case for a different kind of learning in the later years of life”. Educational Gerontology: An International Journal of Research and Practice 26, (2000), 789.

Ardelt, M. “Wisdom as expert knowledge system: A critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept”. Human Development 47, (2004), 257–285.

Assmann, A. “Wholesome knowledge: Concepts of wisdom in a historical and cross-cultural perspective”. Life-span development and behavior (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), (1994),187-224.

Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. . ”The psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis”, in Wisdom: Its nature, origins and development, edited by R. J. Sternberg. (New York: Cambridge University Press), (1990) 87-120.

Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. . Wisdom. A meta-heuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, (2000) 122–136. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.122.

Baltes, P. B., Smith, J., & Staudinger, U. M. “Wisdom and successful aging”, in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, edited by T. Sonderegger (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press), (1992) 123-167.

Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci S.J. Nature-nurture re-conceptualized in developmental perspective: a bio-ecological model. Psychological Review 101, (1994), 568–586.

Brown, S. C., & Greene, J. A. . The Wisdom Development Scale: Translating the conceptual to the concrete”, Journal of College Student Development 47, (2008) 1–19.

Brugman, G. M. Wisdom and aging. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006.

Congregation for the Clergy. The Gift of the Priestly Vocation – Ratio Fundamentalis Institutionis Sacerdotalis. December 8, 2016. Vatican City: 2016.

Erikson, E. H. The life cycle completed: A review. New York: Norton, 1982.

Feist, J., Feist, G. J, & Roberts, TA. Theories of Personality 8th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2013.

Jeste, D. V., Ardelt, M., Blazer, D., Kremer, H. C., Vaillant, G., & Meeks, T. W. “Expert Consensus on Characteristics of wisdom: a Delphi Method Study”, The Gerontologist 50, (2010), 668-680.

John Paul II, P. I will give you shepherds = Pastores dabo vobis: Post-synodal apostolic exhortation, March 25, 1992, (1992).

Kimble, M. A., McFadden, S. H., Ellor, J. W., & Seeber, J. J. Aging, spirituality, and religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.

Levenson, R., Jennings, P.A., Aldwin, C., & Shiraishi, R.W. Self-transcendence, conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 60, (2005),127–143. doi:10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0.

Meacham, J. A. “The loss of wisdom”, in Wisdom: Its nature, origins and development, edited by R. J. Sternberg (New York: Cambridge University Press), (1990),181-211.

Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V., “Neurobiology of wisdom: An overview” Archives of General Psychiatry 66, (2009) 355–365.

Robinson, D. N. “Wisdom through the ages”, in Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development, edited by R. J. Sternberg (New York: Cambridge University Press), (1990), 13-24.

Schmit, D. E, Muldoon, J., & Pounders, K. “What is wisdom? The development and validation of a Multidimensional Measure”, Journal of Leadership, Accountability, and Ethics 9, (2012), 39-54.

Scott C. Brown & Jeffrey A. Greene. “The Wisdom Developmental Scale: Further Validity Investigations, Int’l. J. Aging and Human Development 68 (4) (2009), 289-320.

Sternberg, R. J. Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Sternberg, R. J. Why school should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational setting. Educational Psychologist 36 (2001), 227 – 245.

Vaillant, G. E. Aging well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark Harvard study of adult development. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 2002.

Vijila.Y, Jose Thomas, Ponnusamy. A. Relation between parenting styles and adolescent social competence. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) 17,(2013), 34-36.

Webster, J. D. An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10, (2003), 13–22. doi:10.1023/A:1020782619051; Webster, J. D. Measuring the character strength of wisdom. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 65, (2007) 163–183. doi:10.2190/AG.65.2.d.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/jaot.v3i1.3225