Email this article 
ANALYSIS OF THE COMPETENCY OF FRESH GRADUATED HIGHER EDUCATION IN SUPPORTING INDUSTRIAL ERA 4.0
(1) Politeknik Negeri Medan
(2) Politeknik Negeri Medan
(3) Politeknik Negeri Medan
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article analyzes the need for Industry 4.0 HR competencies. The study was conducted at a number of tertiary institutions in Medan, where the sample was determined by purposive random sampling. The variables used in this study include; a) sense-making, b) social intelligent, c) novel and adaptive thinking, d) cross-cultural competency, e) computational thinking, f) new-media literacy, g) transdisciplinarity, h) design thinking, i) cognitive load management, j) virtual collaboration. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis approach. The output of this research is expected to provide input and strategies for universities in strengthening the quality of the fresh graduated HR output produced. The results of this study indicate that based on the results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the 10 variables used have a positive relationship between variables and can be an estimator to see how fresh graduated human resources are ready to face industry 4.0.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, C., Saregar, A., Hasanah, U., & Widayanti, W. (2018). The effectiveness of Islamic religious education in the universities: The effects on the students’ characters in the era of industry 4.0. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2162
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S. (2009). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barzykowski, K., Majda, A., Przyłęcki, P., & Szkup, M. (2019). The crosscultural competence inventory: Validity and psychometric properties of the polish adaptation. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0212730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212730
Beavers, S., Christopher, P. G., Cheryl, L., Margaret, K. S., & John, P. K. (2017). Virtual collaboration. United States. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US10169824B2/en
Benesova, A., Hirman, M., Steiner, F., & Tupa, J. (2018). Analysis of education requirements for electronics manufacturing within concept industry 4.0. In 2018 41st International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE.2018.8443681
Benešová, A. & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366
Blanchet, M., Rinn, T., Von Thaden, G., & De Thieulloy, G. (2014). Industry 4.0: The new industrial revolution-how Europe will succeed. München: Roland berger strategy consultants GmbH.
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education - implications for policy and practice. JRC Working Papers.
Chen, D.T., Lin, T.B., Li, J.Y., & Lee, L. (2018). Establishing the norm of new media literacy of singaporean students: Implications to policy and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 124, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.010
Chen, J. C. H., Volk, L., & Lin, B. (2004). Virtual collaboration in the workplace.
Academy of Management Perspectives, V(1).
Choiriyah, R. (2015). Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran adaptif terhadap kemampuan memecahkan masalah matematika peserta didik kelas VIII SMP NU 1 Gresik. Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik.
Cooper, G. (1990). Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2322
Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., Gençay, E., Coşkun, S., Kayıkcı, Y., & Gençay, E. (2019). Adapting engineering education to industry 4.0 vision. Technologies, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7010010
Daraiseh, S. (2018). Intercultural competence among English learners at Yarmouk University Jordan. US-China Foreign Language, 16(10), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.17265/15398080/2018.10.001
Dujin, A., Geissler, C., & Horstkötter, D. (2014). Think Act Industry 4.0. The New Industrial Revolution: How Europe Will Succeed. Munich: Ronald Berger Strategy Consultants GmbH.
Evans, P. C. & Annunziata, M. (2012). Industrial internet: Pushing the boundaries.
General Electric Reports, 488-508.
Gudono. (2011). Analisis data multivariat. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi.
Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Kelly, N., Kerr, J., & Wright, N. (2018). How design thinking can help teachers collaborate. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-designthinking- can-help-teachers-collaborate-95932
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Leiba-O’sullivan, S. (1999). The distinction between stable and dynamic crosscultural competencies: Implications for expatriate trainability. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490835
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
Lucke, D., Constantinescu, C., & Westkämper, E. (2008). Smart factory - A step towards the next generation of manufacturing. In Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier (pp. 115–118). London: Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_23
Mobnasesemka. (2018). Apa itu industri 4.0? Dan apa saja elemen yang harus ada? Retrieved June 30, 2018, from http://www.mobnasesemka.com/apa- ituindustri-4-0/
Montuori, A. (2013). Complexity and transdisciplinarity: Reflections on theory and practice. World Futures, 69(4–6), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2013.803349
Moray, N. (2013). Mental workload: Its theory and measurement - Google books (8th ed.). Springer Science & Business Media.
Motyl, B., Baronio, G., Uberti, S., Speranza, D., & Filippi, S. (2017). How will change the future engineers’ skills in the industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.282
Naiman, L. (2019). Design thinking as a strategy for innovation. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from https://www.creativityatwork.com/design-thinking-strategyfor- innovation/
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity - Google books. Suny Press.
Nurwardani, P. (2018a). Strategi pembelajaran sains dan teknologi di perguruan tinggi mengawal revolusi industri 4.0. Orasi Ilmiah Universitas Parahyangan.
Nurwardani, P. (2018b). Strategi pembelajaran sains dan teknologi di perguruan tinggi mengawal revolusi industri 4.0. Bandung: Universitas Parahyangan.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0
Perez, S. E., Watson, I. I., Jack, C., & Barnicle, S. (2019). Effects of Cross-cultural Communication Competence on Tennis Performance. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 15(2), 65-79.
Peters, L. M., & Manz, C. C. (2007). Identifying antecedents of virtual team collaboration. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 13(3/4), 117–129.
Pfeiffer, S. (2015). Effects of industry 4.0 on vocational education and training.
Voced Plus. Retrieved from https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:78324
Plaas, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (2010). Cognitive load theory - Google
books. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plass, J. L. & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5
Poerwaningtias, I., Rianto, P., Ni’am, M., Adiputra, W. M., Marganingtyas, D.,
Mirasari, E., & Misbah, N. A. (2013). Model-model gerakan literasi media dan pemantauan media di Indonesia. (P. Rianto, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Pusat Kajian Media dan Budaya Populer.
Putubuku. (2008). Sense making theory. Retrieved June 30, 2018, from https://iperpin.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/hello-world/
Quint, F., Sebastian, K., & Gorecky, D. (2015). A mixed-reality learning environment. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2015.12.199
Rahim, M., Usman, I., & Puluhulawa, M. (2017). Kecerdasan sosial dan prestasi belajar siswa (Tinjauan dari Perspektif Bimbingan dan Konseling Belajar ). In Proceeding Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Revitalisasi Laboratorium dan Jurnal Ilmiah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Bimbingan dan Konseling Berbasis KKNI.
Rennstich, J. K. (2019). Creative online collaboration: A special challenge for cocreation. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1835–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09875-6
Rojas-Lopez, A. & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2018). Learning scenarios for the subject methodology of programming from evaluating the computational thinking of new students. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 13(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2018.2809941
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54–89.
Sanders, A., Elangeswaran, C., & Wulfsberg, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(3), 811. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1940
Sari, F. F. (2012). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika mengacu pada teori beban kognitif (Cognitive Load Theory) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII-4 SMP Negeri 21 Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang. Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika.
Srivastava, S. C. & Chandra, S. (2018). Social presence in virtual world collaboration: An uncertainty reduction perspective using a mixed methods approch. MIS Quarterly, 42.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitataif dan kombinasi (Mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances.
Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., & Rosas-Casals, M. (2018). Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085
Tenberg, R., & Pittich, D. (2017). Ausbildung 4.0 oder nur 1.2? Analyse eines technisch-betrieblichen wandels und dessen implikationen für die technische berufsausbildung. Journal of Technical Education (JOTED), 5(1).
Tonra, W. S. (2014). Teori beban kognitif. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from http://wildasyamtonra89.blogspot.com/2014/11/teori-beban-kognitif.html
Tortorella, G. L. & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975–2987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420
Widarjono, A. (2010). Analisis statistika multivariat terapan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Wiseman, R. L. & Jolene, K. (1993). Handbook of international and intercultural communication - Google books. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
Wisnubro. (2018). Lima elemen penting menjawab tantangan revolusi industri 4.0
- JPP.go.id.
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2018). Mobile social media in interorganizational projects: Aligning tool, task and team for virtual collaboration effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 36(8), 1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2018.09.003
Zhou, K., Taigang Liu, & Lifeng Zhou. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) (pp. 2147– 2152). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2015.7382284
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v4i1.2242
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
IJIET Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. SK 0547/E5/DT.05.00/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol 5 No 2, 2021 until Vol 10 No 1, 2026.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IJIET DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet
p-ISSN: 2548-8422 (since 5 January 2017); e-ISSN: 2548-8430 (since 5 January 2017)
IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching) is published by the Institute for Research and Community Services of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.