Discouraging Students Academic Dishonesty in Flipped Classroom

Lucia Nino Widiasmoro Dewati

Abstract


Flipped Classroom presents teaching process at home through videos, handouts and listening passages before the class session. While in-class time is mostly devoted for questions and answers session, exercises, projects and discussion. The reason flipped classroom is needed for teachers in this era, simply because at the time students do the assignments inside the classroom, teachers would have the opportunities to observe students interaction, activities, improvement and even to solve students problem such as academic dishonesty. Thus, the question would be: to what extent is the urgency of implementing flipped classroom as one solution to discourage students academic dishonesty in writing classes? The study is conducted by employing Action Research. The findings confirm that performing Flipped Classroom is essential in order to discourage students academic dishonesty while assisting the teacher to observe students development in writing classes.

Keywords


assignment, Flipped Classroom, academic dishonesty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17(4), 515-522.

Burns, A. (2010a). Doing action research for English language teachers. A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.

Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33.

Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D. and Maguire, P. (2003). Why Action Research? in Action Research London: Sage Publications Vol.[1](1) July 2003 P9-28

Bergman, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom. International Society for Technology in Education, 20. Burns, A. (2003). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16-20.

Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using Lean in the Flipped Classroom for At Risk Students. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 356-366.

Hamdan N, McKnight P, McKnight K, Arfstrom KM. A Review of Flipped Learning: Flipped Learning Network. Pearson Education, and George Mason University.; 2013. www.flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/LitReview_FlippedLearning.pdf?utm_source=hootsuite&utm_campaign=hootsuite (accessed 10 August 2016)

Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. D. M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar5.

Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It's wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 209-228.

Ma, H., Chen, Z. Y., & Pan, Z. Y. (2013, August). A case study of collaborative action research: lexical chunk theory and its implication on reading performance. In 2013 International Conference on Applied Social Science Research (ICASSR-2013). Atlantis Press.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. ASCD.

Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. ASCD.

Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used?. Distance Learning, 9(3), 85.

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44.

Rutherfoord, R. H., & Rutherfoord, J. K. (2013, October). Flipping the classroom: Is it for you?. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education (pp. 19-22). ACM.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1)

Tune JD, Sturek M, Basile DP. Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 2013;37:316-320.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v20i1.503

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2328 times
PDF view: 646 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Lucia Nino Widiasmoro Dewati



Indexed and abstracted in:

    

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.