Ema Wilianti Dewi, Joko Nurkamto, Nur Arifah Drajati


This study aims to explore the practice of peer-assessment in academic writing. The current researchers find it urgent to investigate academic writing because it has rigid rules that can sharpen writers' critical thinking. The products of academic writing need to be assessed. Peer-assessment is one of alternatives used to assess students’ learning outcomes and monitor students’ progress in the class. This research is a case study. Data were collected from the first semester students, who joined an academic writing class, of the graduate program of a university  in Surakarta. The findings show that peer assessment practice can be effective as one of the assessment tools to measure students' writing in the academic writing class.


DOI: doi.org/10.24071/llt.2019.220106


academic writing, assessment, case study, peer-assessment

Full Text:



Abidin, N. A., & Sahdan, S. (2015). Peer assessment: A challenge in the new

generation. Advanced Science Letters. 23(2): 908-911.


Azarnoosh, M. (2013). Peer assessment in an EFL context: Attitudes and friendship

bias. Language Testing in Asia, 11(3): 1-10. Retrieved on April 9, 2018 from


Cheng, K., Liang, J. & Tsai C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in

undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment

activity. Internet and Higher Education, 25: 78–84. doi:


Crusan, D. & Matsuda, P. K. (2018). Classroom writing assessment. The TESOL

Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching.


Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. New

York: Routledge Falmer.

Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. London: Kogan


Falchikov, N. & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education:

A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of educational

research, 70(3): 287-322. doi:10.3102%2F00346543070003287

Fritiara, C., Sumardi & Drajati, N. A. (2018). Self-assessment: Its roles for higher

education students in academic writing class. ELS Journal on

Interdisciplinary Studies on Humanities, 1(3): 357-365. Retrieved on

November 2, 2018 from http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish

Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in

academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4): 179-197.


Hyland, K. (2004). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University


Hyland, K. & Diani, G. (2009). Academic evaluation: Review genres in university

settings. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Iraji, H. R., Enayat, M. J., & Momeni, M. (2016). The effects of self- and peer

assessment on Iranian EFL learners' argumentative writing performance.

Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4): 716-722. Retrieved on June 4,



Karami, A. & Rezaei, A. (2015). An overview of peer assessment: The benefits and

Importance. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 3(1), 93-100.


Meek, S.E.M., Blackemore, L., & Marks, L. (2016). Is peer review an

appropriate form of assessment in MOOC? Student participation and

performance in formative peer review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher

Education. 42(6): 1000-1013. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052

Min, L. & Tu, Y. (2005). Peer-and-self assesment to reveal the ranking of each

individual’s contribution to a group project. Journal of Information Systems

Education, 16(2): 197-205. Retrieved on June 4, 2014 from


Richards, J. C. (2017). Curriculum development: In language teaching (2nd ed.).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and

grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2): 159–179.


Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment.

New Zealand: Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako.

Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice. 48: 20-27.


Topping, K. J., Smith, I. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer

assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2): 149-169. doi:10.1080/713611428

Topping, K.J. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the

work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1): 1

Retrieved on June 4, 2018 from https://riverapublication.com

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication Inc.

Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL

writing. ELT Journal. 62(2): 155-168. doi:10.1093/elt/cct068

Zhao, H. (2018). Exploring tertiary English as a Foreign Language writing tutors’

perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for writing. Assessment

& Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13


Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y & Zhang, F. (2017). Student attitudes predict

participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher

Education, 43(5), 800–811. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexed and abstracted in:






This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

LLT Journal DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt

p-ISSN: 1410-7201 (since 12 March 1998); e-ISSN: 2579-9533 (since 16 May 2017)

LLT Journal Vol 22, No 1 (current edition), publication date: 10 April 2019

View My Stats

Free counters!

  LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching is published by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Eduation Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.