TINDAK TUTUR DAN PERWATAKAN DALAM CERPEN HARGA SEORANG PEREMPUAN KARYA OKA RUSMINI
(1)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Eventhough it has been aware that the speech uttured by the novel characters can be used to identify their own attitudes and personalities, the pragmatic studies on the use of utturance types in relation to the literary characterization are rare. This study seeks to prove that speech acts together with their strategies in literary works are essentially the reflection of those story characters behaviour, and therefore pragmatic approach is an important tool for analyzing and understanding characters of literary works.
KEY WORDS character, speech act, utturance
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allan, K. 1986. Linguistic Meaning. Volume I, London: Routledge & Kean Paul.
Aiston, W.P. 1964. Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-I-Tall.
Brown, P. & Levinson S. 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenome-na. In Goody, EN. (Ed.). Questions and Politeness: strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dardjowidjojo, S. 2003. Psikolinguistik, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Foley, W. A. 2001. Anthropological Linguistics: An introduction: Oxford: Blackwell.
Halliday. M.A.K. & Hasan, R. 1992. Bahasa, Konteks, dan Teks. Terjemahan Tou, A.B. Ramlan, M. (Ed.). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmutics. London: Longman.
Parker, F. 1986. Liguistics for Non-Linguists. London: Francis & Taylor Ltd.
Pradopo, R.D. 1999. Pengkajian Puisi, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Stanton, Robert. 1965. An introduction to Fiction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wins-ton, Inc.
Searle, J.R. 1979. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Act, in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, SpeechActs, Cole, P. & Morgan, J.L. (Eds.), NewYork: Academic Press.
Tasrif, S. Tanpa tahun. Beberapa Hal tentang Cerita Pendek. Dalam Teknik Menga-rang. Mochtar Lubis (Ed.). Cet. Ke-4, Jakarta: Nunang Jaya.
Teeuw, A. 1978. Tergantung pada Kata, Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnolod.
Widayati, Siti. 1982. Sebuah Tinjauan Novel Hati Nurani Manusia. Skripsi. Fakultas Sastra dan Kebudayaan Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Wijana, I.D.P. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Wijana, I.DP. 1998. Metapesan Kalirnat Tanya dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Dalam Mi-bas. No. 19. th. IX. Surakarta: Fakultas Keguruan Ilmu Pendidikan Uni-versitas Muhammadiyah.
Wijana, I.D.P. 2005. Teori Kesantuan dalam Humor. Gatra. No. 29Th. XXI, 1-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/sin.v6i1.2711
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 I Dewa Putu Wijana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sintesis by https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/sintesis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sintesis
View My Stats Sintesis