ERRORS AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING: IMPLICATIONS TO OUR CLASSROOM PRACTICES

Maria Corazon Saturnina A. Castro(1*),

(1) University of the Philippines, Quezon City
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Error correction is one of the most contentious and misunderstood issues in both foreign and second language teaching. Despite varying positions on the effectiveness of error correction or the lack of it, corrective feedback remains an institution in the writing classes. Given this context, this action research endeavors to survey prevalent attitudes of teachers and students toward corrective feedback and examine their implications to classroom practices. This paper poses the major problem: How do teachers perspectives on corrective feedback match the students views and expectations about error treatment in their writing? Professors of the University of the Philippines who teach composition classes and over a hundred students enrolled in their classes were surveyed. Results showed that there are differing perceptions of teachers and students regarding corrective feedback. These oppositions must be addressed as they have implications to current pedagogical practices which include constructing and establishing appropriate lesson goals, using alternative corrective strategies, teaching grammar points in class even in the tertiary level, and further understanding the learning process.

Keywords


writing, errors, corrective feedback, classroom practices, teaching strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ferris, D.R. (2011). Treatment of errors in second language student writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D.R., & Hedgecock, J.S. (1998). Teaching ESL compositions: Purpose, process, and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hedgecock, J.S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learning receptivity in Second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.

James, C. (1998). Errors and language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. New York: Pearson Longman.

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103-110.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v20i2.743

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Maria Corazon Saturnina A. Castro



Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.