ALGERIAN THIRD YEAR ENGLISH COURSEBOOK SCRUTINY: ‘MY BOOK OF ENGLISH’ AS A SAMPLE
(1) Ibn Khaldoun University of Tiaret Algeria, Algeria
(2) Ibn Khaldoun University of Tiaret Algeria, Algeria
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that coursebooks can be a useful source of information and knowledge for both teachers and learners. They are frequently written by subject-matter experts and can provide a logical and exhaustive overview of the target topic. Referring to the 2022-2023 academic year and with respect to the integration of English in Algerian primary school education, it was noticed that the circumstances in which the decision has been taken might need much more time because the interval between the decision of English integration and coursebook design was too short for a well-thought teaching material. Therefore, the major issue that is being questioned is how well ‘My Book of English’ meets the learners’ age, interest, and attractiveness. The issue under investigation seeks to scrutinize the un/suitability of the current English coursebook content and its impact on 3rd-year primary school learners as regards their competency, needs, and preferences. To answer the research questions and dis/confirm its hypotheses, the study relies on a mixed method, ensuring credible and valid data. Consequently, one questionnaire was put online, and addressed to primary school English teachers, and only fifty-four (54) respondents willingly responded. Besides, the coursebook evaluation grid was filled out by two experts, i.e., primary-school English teachers’ trainers. The results reveal that the coursebook content contains some shortcomings such as poor representation of the language culture, authentic material, grammar logical order, and glossary. In fact, these deficiencies should be palliated for high-quality instruction and successful achievement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Charalambous, A. C. (2011). The role and use of course books in EFL. Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524247.pdf
Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to research methods: A practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project (4th ed.). Oxford: How to Books.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). Triangulation: A case for methodological evaluation and combination. Sociological Methods, 339-357.
Douglas, H. B. (2000). Teaching by principles: An introductive approach to language pedagogy. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Haycraft, J., & Byrne, D. (ed). (1978). An introduction to English language teaching. London & New York: Longman.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The coursebook as the agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-28.
Karima, L.A. (2008). Is the educational system weakening? A comparative study of proficiency tests. Revue Science Humaines, 19(3), 77-93.
Kattel, M. (2021). Analysis of English coursebook of grade ten. Nepal: Faculty of Education Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur Kathmandu.
Kovac, M., & Alenka, K. M. (2022). The changing role of coursebooks in primary education in the digital era: What can we learn from reading research? Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.129.
Litz, D. R. A. (2005). Coursebook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal, 1-53. Retrieved from http://www.asian.efl.journal.com/Litz-thesis-pdf
MAE904, M. (2021). Principles for teaching vocabulary. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Nainggolan, B. R., & Wirza, Y. (2021). Evaluation of an English coursebook: Does ‘English in mind’ promote critical thinking skills? Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 51-59.
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
Richards, J. (2001). The role of coursebooks in a language program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sheldon, L. (1987). ELT coursebook and materials: Problems in evaluation and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT coursebook and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.
Tibebu, M. (2017). EFL teachers’ practice of adapting coursebook materials: The case of five selected high schools in ILU ABA BOR zone. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 5(2), 253-276.
Tomlinson, B., Masuhara, H., &Tomlinson, B. (ed). (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London, UK: Continuum.
Umar, A. A., & Ameen, A. A. (2022). Evaluation of an E.S.P. textbook from teachers’ and learners’ points of view: A case study of nursing one for premedical learners at a Saudi University. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13(2), 157-176. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.11
Ur, P. (1999). A Course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6884
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ammar BENABED, Ahmed MEHDAOUI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.