Email this article AN ANALYSIS OF THE NEGOTIATION OF MEANING AND FORM IN NATURAL EFL CLASSROOMS: A CASE STUDY AMONG PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
(1) Unika Atma Jaya
(2) Unika Atma Jaya
(3) Unika Atma Jaya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The present competence of language learners influences the process, particularly in modifying the input to ensure the exact level of comprehensibility they can manage. It involves the negotiation of meaning (NfM) and form (NfF). Teachers need to pay attention to how frequently both processes occur in classroom interaction and whether the teachers use this situation to enhance students’ language acquisition. Thus, this study aims to seek information concerning the negotiation of meaning and form in the natural classroom setting involving student teachers in a practicum program. To reach the objective of this study, two research questions will address: (1) Do negotiation of meaning and form take place in student-teacher-student interaction in a natural EFL classroom setting? (2) How do the student-teachers use negotiation of meaning and form strategies in the EFL classroom? Mixed method research will be employed by analyzing the utterances and conducting interviews. The analysis of the study reveals that firstly, NfM and NfF are two common occurrences in the student-teacher interaction in the natural EFL classroom under study; secondly, the strategies used by both NfM and NfF covered the negotiation processes with various moves and Long’s (1996) types of signals embracing confirmation check, clarification request, and comprehension check in certain circumstances. Eventually, this study brings profound implications in two areas, namely the design of a teacher training curriculum and the teaching pedagogy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afalla, B. T., & Fabelico, F. L. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical competence and teaching efficiency. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 223-228.
Bitchener, J. (2004). The relationship between the negotiation of meaning and language learning: A longitudinal study. Language Awareness, 13(2), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410408667088
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and method approach. California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). “Information-gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 305-326.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.1
Foster, P., & Ofta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430.
Hartono, R. (2017). A critical review of research on negotiation of meaning in second language learning. Global Expert Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 6(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.36982/jge.v6i1.257
Hwang, J. (2010). Negotiation about form across L2 proficiency levels and its role in second language learning. English Teaching, 65(2), 47-73.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Lengluan, N. (2008). An analysis of conversational exchanges between grade 12 Thai students and native English speakers via a chat program: Strategies of negotiation for meanings. Bangkok: Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
Lier, L., Nakahama, Y., & Tyler, A. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and gap information activity: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377-405. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
Lyster, R., & L. Ranta. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Lyster, R. (2002). Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00003-X
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497.
Masrizal, M. (2014). The role of negotiation of meaning in L2 interactions: An analysis from perspective of Long’s interaction hypothesis. Studies in English Language and Education, 1(2), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v1i2.1829.
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & Lier, L.V. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377-405.
Palma, G. (2014). A classroom view of negotiation of meaning with EFL adult Mexican pupils. SAGE Open, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014535941
Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. M. Gass & C.G. Madden (Eds.), Input in the second language acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House.
Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.1.3
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x
Richard, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
Shim, Y. (2007). Negotiation of meaning between an L2 teacher and students in face-to-face interaction and CMC. English Teaching, 62(3), 265-288.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.4799
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Paulina Chandrasari Kusuma, Christina Eli Indriyani, Tia Xenia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 1 Certificate (S1 = Level 1)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 1 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 169/E/KPT/2024. Validity for 5 years: Vol ... No 1, 20... till Vol ... No 2, 20...
Sinta 1 certificate to post here asap. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.