THE IMPLEMENTATION OF VIRTUAL PEER MENTORING IN MICRO TEACHING CLASSES

Caecilia Tutyandari, Christina Lhaksmita Anandari, Priyatno Ardi

Abstract


This study aims to explore the implementation of virtual peer mentoring in Micro Teaching classes and to identify common teaching aspects assessed by peer observers. Employing an online observation form and focus group discussion, data were collected to address the research questions. The participants were 59 English language education students enrolled in three classes of Micro Teaching. Every student was assigned to do an observation on their peer teacher and give feedback to their performance. At the end of the semester, nine student teachers, representing the three Micro Teaching classes, were invited to a forum group discussion. The current research findings suggest that peer virtual peer mentoring is perceived positively by the participants. Breakout rooms in Zoom platform is a useful tool to give them more personal interactions, especially when sharing the result of observation. Even though giving feedback virtually is a challenge for the student teachers, they appear to see the activity as a valuable process. When observing and commenting on their peer teachers, they also do self-evaluation and reflection. Their peer teaching performance is a way to assess their own performance. Furthermore, other findings reveal common teaching aspects observed, namely linguistic aspects, pedagogical skills, and communication skills.


Keywords


EFL, mentoring, student teachers, virtual peer mentoring

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambrosetti, A. (2010). The interconnectedness of the roles of mentors and mentees in pre-service teacher education mentoring relationships. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 42-55.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, R. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Bressman, S., Winter, J. S., & Efron, S. E. (2018). Next generation mentoring: Supporting teachers beyond induction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 162-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.003

Çapan, S. A., & Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of practicum through reciprocal peer mentoring and traditional mentoring. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 953-971.

Cavanagh, M., & King, A. (2020). Peer-group mentoring for primary pre-service teachers during professional experience. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 287-300.

Clark, S. & Newberry, M. (2018). Are we building preservice teacher self-efficacy? A large-scale study examining teacher education experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1497772

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022487100051003002

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022487105285962

Dixon, K., Excell, L., Linington, V., Mathews, C., Mduli, M., & Motilal, G. (2012). Strengthening foundation phase teacher education through mentoring. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 2(1), 33-49.

Faber, C. J., Smith-Orr, C. S., Lee, W. C., Bodnar, C. A., Strong, A. C., & McCave, E. (2017). Best practices for developing a virtual peer mentoring community. Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.

Gurer, M. D. (2020). Sense of community, peer feedback and course engagement as predictors of learning in blog environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 237-250.

Gustems-Carnicer, J. (2019). Stress, coping strategies and academic achievement in teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576629

Hansford, B. & Ehrich, L. C. (2006). The principalship: How significant is mentoring?. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610642647

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Huizing, R. L. (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599

Matney, G. (2018). Peer mentoring professionalism among pre-service mathematics teachers: safe spaces for community teaching practice. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(2), 67-84.

Merrick, D., Hodgson, J., Hagan, & Mbaki, Y. (2021). Virtual peer mentoring: A partnership between two UK medical schools. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(1), 1-9.

Mullen, C. A. & Klimaitis, C. C. (2021). Defining mentoring: A literature review of issues, types, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1483(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14176

Ohlson, M. (2012). Virtual mentoring: Developing global leaders for life. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 21(2), 175-185.

Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Reese, J. (2015). Virtual mentoring of preservice teachers: Mentors’ perceptions. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083715577793

Ruegg, R. (2015). Differences in the uptake of peer and teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 46(2), 131-145.

See, N. L. M. (2014). Mentoring and developing pedagogical content knowledge in beginning teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1397

Stoeger, H., Balestrini, D. P., & Ziegler, A. (2020). Key issues in professionalizing mentoring practices. Annals of the New York Academic of Sciences, 1483(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14537

Tutyandari, C. (2020). Exploring pre-service teachers’ perceptions of preparedness for teaching in Indonesian contexts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Wisniewski, B., Ziever, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.4213

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Caecilia Tutyandari, Christina Lhaksmita Anandari, Priyatno Ardi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

    

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.