Reflective Practices for Teacher Education
(1) Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allington, R.L. (2009). Literacy policies that are needed thinking beyond No Child Left Behind. In J.V. Hoffman & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Changing literacies for changing times: An historical perspective (pp. 266-280). NY: Routledge.
Apple, M. (1979). Curriculum and reproduction. Curriculum Inquiry, 9 (3), 231-252.
Apple, W. (2009). Is there a place for education in social transformation? In H.S. Shapiro (Ed.), Education and hope in troubled times: Vision of change for our children's world (pp. 29-46). New York: Routledge.
Baines, L., & Foster, H. (2006). A school for the common good. Educational Horizons, 84(4), 221-228.
Borden, L.M., Stone, M., & Villarruel, F.A. (2004). Public policy and human development. Encyclopedia of Applied Developmental Science. SAGE Publications. Retrieved June 29, 2011 from http://www.sage-ereference.com/view/applieddevscience/n345.xml.
Chall, J.S. (1989). "Learning to read: The great debate" 20 years later: A response to 'Debunking the great phonics myth.' The Phi Delta Kappan, 70(7), 521-538.
Coles, G. (2001). Reading to read -"scientifically". Rethinking Schools Online, 15(4). Retrieved October 8, 2011 from http://www.rethinking schools.org/archive/15_04/Read154.shtml Costa, A.L. & Kallick, B. (2010). Getting used to: Rethinking curriculum for the 21st century. In H.H. Jacobs, Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world (pp. 210-226). Alexandria, VA: ASCD Diamond, J.B. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 285-313.
Eldesky, C. (1990). Whose agenda is this anyway? A response to McKenna, Robinson, and Miller. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 7-11.
Fowler, F.C. (2006). Struggling with theory: A beginning scholar's experience with Mazzoni's arena models. In V.A. Anfara & N.T. Mertz (Eds.) Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (pp. 39-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Garan, E.M. (2001). Beyond the smoke and mirrors: A critique of the National Reading Panel Report on phonics. Phi Delta Kappan, 500-506.
Goodman, K.S. (1989). Whole-language research: Foundations and development. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 207-221.
Goodman, Y.M. (1989). Roots of the whole-language movement. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 113-127.
Harrison, C. (2010). Why do policy-makers find the simple view of reading so attractive, and why do I find it so morally repugnant? In K. Hall, U. Goswami, C. Harrison, & J.S. Soler (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on learning to read: Cognition, culture and pedagogy (pp. 207-218). New York: Routledge.
Hess, F. (2006). Tough love for schools: Essays on competition, accountability and excellence. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Hess, F.M., & Petrilli, M.J. (2006). No Child Left Behind Primer. New York: Peter Lang.
Kincheloe, J. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc.
McNeil, J.D. (2009). Contemporary curriculum: In thought and action (6th Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Meyer, R.J. (2003). Captives of the script - killing us softly with phonics: A critical analysis demonstrates that scripted phonics programs hold students and teachers as curriculum hostages. Rethinking Schools Online, 17(4). Retrieved October 8, 2011 from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/17_04/capt174.shtml
Moorman, G.B., Blanton, W.E., & McLaughlin, T. (1994). The rhetoric of whole language. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(4), 308-329.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instructions, reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved September 20, 2011 from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publica nrp/upload/report.pdf No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Title I: Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged. (2001). Washington DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, George Washington University.
Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pearson, P.D. (1989). Reading the whole-language movement. The Elementary School Journal, 90(2), 230-241.
Pearson, P. D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy,18(1), 216-252.
Perlstein, L. (2008). Tested: One American school struggles to make the grade. New York: Holt.
Shaker, P. (2008). Education, policy and politics. Encyclopedia of Social Problems. Sage Publications. Retrieved June 29, 2011 from .
Shannon, P. (2007). Reading against democracy: The broken promises of reading instruction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Shannon, P., Edmonson, J., Ortega, L., Pitcher, S., & Robbins, C. (2009). Fifty years of Federal Government involvement in reading education. In J.V. Hoffman & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Changing literacies for changing times: An historical perspective (pp. 251-265). NY: Routledge.
Slavin, R.E., & Cheung, A. (2005). A synthesis of research on language of reading instruction for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 247-284.
Smith, F. (1992). Learning to read: The never-ending debate. The Phi Delta Kappan, 73(6), 432-435, 438-441.
Sunderman, G. L. (2006). The unraveling of No Child Left Behind: How negotiated changes transform the law. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
Taubman, P.M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Wilson, S.M., & Tamir, E. (2008). The evolving field of teacher education: How understanding challenge(r)s might improve the preparation of teachers. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feinman-Nemser, D.J. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed. pp. 908-935). New York: Association of Teacher Education.
Yatvin, L. (2000). Minority view. In National Reading Panel, Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved September 20, 2011 from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/report.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v15i1.313
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Paulus Kuswandono
Indexed and abstracted in:
LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)
We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.