ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF THE LENGTH OF /ʃ/ AND /Ʒ/ IN ENGLISH AFFRICATES

Ammar A. A. Al Abdely(1*), Mariam S. Hardan(2),

(1) University Of Anbar, Education College for Women, English Language Department
(2) University Of Anbar, Education College for Women, English Language Department
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


To participate in the ongoing debate of whether affricates are single phonemes or a combination of two distinct phonemes, this paper reports the results of an acoustic study of affricates. One of the arguments that supports one phoneme analysis is based on the assumption that the length of /ʃ/ and /Ʒ/ as single phonemes tends to be shorter when they are involved within the affricates    /ʃ/ and /Ʒ/ respectively. However, this assumption has not been acoustically investigated. Thus, this paper measures the duration of /ʃ/ and /Ʒ/: first when they are alone, and second when they are involved in affricates to identify any length variation between the two cases. The study is based on acoustic and statistical analyses of the recordings of Iraqi, British and American speakers of English, who were asked to pronounce words that have the two fricatives /ʃ/ and /Ʒ/ alone and in affricates as well. The results of paired samples t-tests showed a significant difference in the length of /ʃ/ and /Ʒ/ as single phonemes and their length when involved within affricates in the pronunciation of Iraqi, British and American speakers both on the group and the overall levels. These results support the one phoneme analysis of affricates. Moreover, the results indicated that Arab learners and Iraqis in particular count heavily on temporal cues rather than spectral cues in perceiving English sounds. This shows the need for more training on the part of learners and teachers, and more attention on the part of English textbook designers.


Keywords


SLA, speech analysis, accoustics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Abdely, A. A. W. (2016). Perception and production of English Vowels by Native Iraqi Arabic Learners. (Doctoral dissertation, UPM, FBMK, Malaysia).

Al-Abdely, A. A.W., & Yap, N. T. (2016). Learning English vowels by Iraqi EFL learners: Perceived difficulty versus actual performance. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 22(1).

Alfehaid, M. (2015). Pronunciation problems Arab speakers encounter while learning English. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6(10), pp.581-582.

Alzahrani, D. S. M. (2014). The acquisition of tense/lax distinction by Arabic speakers learning English as a second language. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2013). Introduction to research in education. United States: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.‏

Boersma, P. P. G., & Weenink, D. J. M. (1996). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer: Version 3.4. Instituut voor Fonetische Wetenschappen.

Clements, G. N. (1999). Affricates as noncontoured stops. In Item, order in language and speech. Prague.

Davis, S. (1989). The location of the feature [continuant] in feature geometry. Lingua, 78(1), 1-22.

Dorman, M. F., Raphael, L. J., & Isenberg, D. (1980). Acoustic cues for a fricative-affricate contrast in word-final position. Journal of Phonetics, 8(4), 397-405.

Hall, T. A. (2012). The representation of affricates in Cimbrian German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 24(1), 1-22.

IBM Corp. Released (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Kehrein, W. (2002). Phonological representation and phonetic phasing. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Liu, C. T., Chen, L. M., Lin, Y. C., Cheng, C. F., & Chang, H. C. (2016). Speech Intelligibility and the Production of Fricative and Affricate among Mandarin-speaking Children with Cerebral Palsy. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2016) (pp. 153-163).

Maddieson, I. (2005). “Presence of Uncommon Consonants”, In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil and Bernard Comrie (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 82-83.

Mannell, R., (2008). Speech spectra and spectrograms. Macquarie University, Australia.

Munro, M. J. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36(1), 39-66.

Nikolova-Simic, A. (2010). L1 interference in the perception and production of English vowels by Arabic speakers (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, Shirley M. Hufstedler School of Education, San Diego).

O'Connor, J. D. (2003). Better English Pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

Odlin, T. (2003). Cross‐linguistic influence. The handbook of second language acquisition, 436-486.

Philip, C. (1999). English Phonetics and Phonology: An introduction.

Pycha, A. (2009). Lengthened affricates as a test case for the phonetics–phonology interface. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 39(1), 1-31.

Roach, P. (2010). English phonetics and phonology fourth edition: A practical course. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L. & Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust?. Methodology.

Shariq, M. (2015). Arabic and English Consonants: A Phonetic and Phonological Investigation. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(6), 146-152.

Thurgood, E. (2003). Affricate gemination in the English of Polish speakers: A study in second language variability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(4), 2330-2330.

Twaddell, W. F. (1952). Phonemes and allophones in speech analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(6), 607-611.

van de Weijer, J. (2014). Affricates in English as a natural class. Above and beyond segments–Experimental linguistics and phonetics, 350-358.

Wee, L. H. & Cheung, W. H. (2009). An Animated and Narrated Glossary of Terms Used in Linguistics. Hong Kong Baptist University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i1.2633

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ammar A. A. Al Abdely

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.