CONTENT INSTRUCTOR AS SURROGATE ESL TEACHER: A SURVEY ON PERCEPTION, KNOWLEDGE AND WILLINGNESS

Ahmad Nazri Abdullah(1*),

(1) Universiti Malaysia Perlis
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In a normal university curriculum, students have to fulfil a minimum of 120 credit hours before they can graduate with a bachelors degree; of these, about 6 to 9 credit hours are usually reserved for ESL classes where students are taught the necessary language skills for use within the academic ambience or for future communication in the workplace. The amount of time reserved for language instruction might not be enough to really prepare students for the rigor of real-life academic and workplace demands. It is felt that the huge amount of time utilized for content-based subjects might serve as a valuable platform for language acquisition to take place if content instructors have the necessary language skills and if they can be made to view their role as surrogate ESL instructors. This paper sets out to gauge content instructors perception of their mastery of English, the role they can play as surrogate ESL instructors and their willingness to do so. A total of 24 content instructors from a technical university were selected as participants to provide the necessary information. Results indicate that most of the respondents perceived themselves as not apt to act as surrogate ESP instructors due to shortcomings in their language proficiency.

Keywords


ESP, surrogate teachers, content instructors, language acquisition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulaziz, M., Shah, S., Mahmood, R., & Fazel e Hagh, H. (2012). Change from a general English teacher to an ESP practitioner: Issues and challenges in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(1), 434-465.

Abukhattala, I. (2013). Krashen's five proposals on language learning: Are they valid in Libyan EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 128-131.

Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for Specific Purposes. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Belcher, D. (2009). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice, 1-20. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Bojovi?, M. (2006). Teaching foreign language for specific purposes: Teacher development. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Association of Teacher Education in Europe, 487-493.

Brinton, D. (2003). Content-based instruction. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English Language Teaching, 199-224. New York: McGraw Hill.

Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House.

Cenaj, M. (2015). Pedagogical challenges of ESP teachers in Albania. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3), 489- 493.

Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content, 5-21. NY: Longman.

Coltrane, B. (2002). Team teaching: Meeting the needs of English language learners through collaboration. Center for Applied Linguistics Newsletter, 25(2), 1-5.

Creese, A. (2002). Discursive construction of power in teacher relationships. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 597-616.

Davison, C. (2006). Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right? The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454-475.

Dudley-Evans, T. & St. John, A. M. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hoa, N. & Pham T. T. M. (2016). Difficulties in teaching English for specific purposes: Empirical study at Vietnam Universities. Higher Education Studies, 6(2), 154-161.

Khattak, I. & Asrar, M. (2007). Stages of language acquisition in the natural approach to language teaching. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 23(1), 251-256.

Krashen, S. D. & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: Pergamon Press.

Li, X. (2012). Theoretical base and problems in Business English teaching in China. English for Specific Purposes World. Retrieved June 6, 2017 from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_8/Li.htm

Littlewood, W. & William, L. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liu, D. (2015). A critical review of Krashens input hypothesis: Three major arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4): 139-146.

Matamoros-Gonzlez, J. A., Rojas, M. A., Romero, J. P., Vera-Quionez, S., & Soto, S. T. (2017). English language teaching approaches: A comparison of the grammar-translation, audiolingual, communicative, and natural approaches. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(11), 965-973.

Mendoza, G. I. (2016). Exploring gesturing as a natural approach to impact stages of second language development: A multiple baseline, single case study of a head start child. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. http://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3121

Sam, D. P. (2016). Natural approach of teaching English language on a flipped classroom platform to tertiary level engineering learners. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(1-2), 13-18.

Shamsudin, S. & Sanmugam, S. T. (2015). Readiness to teach ESP: A case of Polytechnic English Language Lecturers. The Social Sciences, 10, 346-352.

Setyarini, M. C. E. (2018). Student teachers difficulties in teaching English to hotel staff. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 7(1), 23-34.

Shiela, M. K. M. (2016). The natural approach. Journal of English Language and Literature, 3(1): 8-16.

Stern, H. H. (1989). Seeing the wood and the trees. In K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum, 207-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Venkatraman, G. & Prema, D. (2007). Developing a set of competencies for teachers of English in engineering colleges, English for Specific Purposes World. Issue 3 (16), Vol. 6. Retrieved June 6, 2017 from http://www.esp-world. Info/Articles_14/India.htm.

Venkatraman, G. & Prema, P. (2007). Developing a set of competencies for teachers of English in engineering colleges. English for Specific Purposes World, 3(6), 16.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v22i1.1683

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Ahmad Nazri Abdullah



Indexed and abstracted in:

     

 

 

LLT Journal Sinta 2 Certificate (S2 = Level 2)

We would like to inform you that LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching has been nationally accredited Sinta 2 by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia based on the decree  No. Surat Keputusan 158/E/KPT/2021. Validity for 5 years: Vol 23 No 1, 2020 till Vol 27 No 2, 2024

  

 

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Free counters!


 LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt, e-ISSN 2579-9533 and p-ISSN 1410-7201, is published twice a year, namely in April and October by the English Language Education Study Programme of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.