Can We Call the Speech Acts of Heroes who Bounce Back from Defeat Ultimatives?

SF Luthfie Arguby Purnomo(1*),

(1) UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In animated films and video games, there is always a scene where the heroes bounce back from defeat and charge the villains with a final strike. I argue that this particular scene has a specific speech act – ultimative. To prove this claim, I employed apostrophe as a dramatic device by Wagener (1931), speech act markers by Zeevat (2003), speech act formula by Pawley (2009), and invocation by Frankfurter (2019) on twenty titles of animated films and video games to indicate the presence of ultimatives. The findings indicate that ultimatives have distinctive traits. Speech act markers of sudden changes of speech and narratives, pathic speech act markers, and speech act markers of invocation construct them. The combination of these three elements constructs the speech act of ultimatives. I also found that ultimatives in animated films and video games have different functions due to different characteristics and features of the media. In animated films, ultimatives function as a narrative marker indicating that ultimatives signify the plot progression and rationalization. In video games, ultimatives function not only as a narrative marker but also as mechanical marker. Functioning as a mechanical marker indicates that ultimatives require the players to perform certain mechanical interactions through button configuration to bounce back from possible game over. Narrative designers of both animated films and video games could employ the results of this study as a consideration in designing dramatic battle scenes that contain apostrophes to evoke narrative engagement from the audiences and gamers.

Keywords


apostrophe; invocation; narratives; speech act markers; ultimatives

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boitani, P. (2021). Anagnorisis: Scenes and Themes of Recognition and Revelation in Western Literature (Vol. 204). Brill.

Buch, R. (2010). The Pathos of the Real: On the Aesthetics of Violence in the Twentieth Century. JHU Press.

Cawelti, J. G. (1972). The concept of formula in the study of popular literature. The Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 5, 115-123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1314918

Corrigan, R., Wheatley, K., Ouali, H., & Moravcsik, E. A. (2009). Formulaic language. Formulaic Language, 1-389.

Dean, A. (1990). David Mamet: Language as dramatic action. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.

Elam, K. (1984). Shakespeare's Universe of Discourse: Language-games in the Comedies. Cambridge University Press.

Field, T. T. (1983, March). Speech act markers in modern Gascon. In Selected Papers from the XIIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages: Chapel Hill, NC (pp. 77-97).

FitzGerald, W., & Oakley, T. (2016). Invocation or apostrophe?. The Conversation Frame: NForms and functions of fictive interaction, 55, 131.

Frankfurter, D. (2019). Spell and speech act: the magic of the spoken word. In Guide to theNstudy of ancient magic (pp. 608-625). Brill.

Freytag, G. (1895). Technique of the drama: An exposition of dramatic composition and art. S. Griggs.

Levin, M. (2014). The Bathroom Formula: A corpus-based study of a speech act in American and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.001

Mastronarde, D. J. (2010). The art of Euripides: dramatic technique and social context.Cambridge University Press.

Miller, J. H. (1990). Naming and Doing: Speech Acts in Hopkins' Poems. Religion & Literature, 173-191.

Nordlund, M. (2016). Shakespearean Inside: A Study of the Complete Soliloquies and Solo Asides. Edinburgh University Press.

Pawley, A. (2009). Grammarians’languages versus humanists’ languages and the place of speech act formulas in models of linguistic competence. Formulaic language, 1, 3-26.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.

Steven, M. (2018). Community and Apostrophe in the Novels of EL Doctorow. Studies in American Fiction, 45(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.2018.0005

Wagener, A. P. (1931, January). Stylistic Qualities of the Apostrophe to Nature as a Dramatic Device. In Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (pp. 78-100). American Philological Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/282967

Zeevat, H. (2003). The syntax semantics interface of speech act markers. In Proceedings Diabruck, 7th workshop on the semantics and the pragmatics of dialogue, Wallerfangen.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.9017

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by  Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.

JOLL is indexed in:

       


This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats