A Literary Crossroads: Colonial Anxiety and Ecological Imperialism in The Tale of Saidjah and Adinda

Edward Owen Teggin; Kristiawan Indriyanto

doi:10.24071/joll.v24i2.8282

A Literary Crossroads: Colonial Anxiety and Ecological Imperialism in The Tale of Saidjah and Adinda

Edward Owen Teggin^(1*), Kristiawan Indriyanto⁽²⁾,

(1) Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article examines the concepts of ecological anxiety and imperialism through the prism of colonial literature, with the aim of contextualising them alongside the broader theory of colonial anxiety. The study examines The Tale of Saidjah and Adinda, contained in Max Havelaar, as a case study. The text was investigated in order to identify key signifiers of anxiety, with the buffalo being the strongest signifier identified for discussion. The premise is that colonial and ecological signifiers can be seen in the narrative containing the buffalo due to the exploitative imperial process at work and the anxiety experienced by characters such as Saidjah and Adinda when buffalo were stolen. This approach is well suited to the current study due to the way in which Multatuli has used the buffalo, both symbolically and as a major part of the narrative, to demonstrate the damage done to the Javanese people and the environment by the colonial-imperial process. This study demonstrates that colonial and ecological anxiety are closely allied fields that can be used to expand on literary works and analyses dealing with the colonial-imperial era. So too, it is argued, that Indonesia has a key role to play in future debates of both colonial and ecological anxiety.

Keywords

colonial anxiety; ecological imperialism; Max Havelaar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Barros, B., & Wilk, R. (2021). The outsized carbon footprints of the super-rich. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1949847

Brown, K. (2023). Invasion, Replacement and Colonial Anxiety in The War of the Worlds. Performance Research, 28(3), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2023.2272513

Caesarine, R. D., Ericha, F. & Dewi, N. (2024). Human Abuse of Nature and Ecological Repentance in Two Selected Short Stories in Kompas: An Ecocritical Reading. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 352-368. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.v5i2.9828

Caracciolo, M. (2022). Storying the Anthropocene: Narrative challenges and opportunities in times of climate change. In P. Dawson & M. Mäkelä (Eds.), The Routledge companion to narrative theory (pp. 542–555). New York, NY: Routledge.

Crosby, A. (1972). The Columbian exchange: Biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Crosby, A. (1986). Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dazzi, C., & Lo Papa, G. (2015). Anthropogenic soils: General aspects and features. Ecocycles, 1(1), 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v1i1.23

Dillon, D. (2022). Wilderness in 19th Century South Seas Literature: An Ecocritical Search for Seascapes. ETropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics, 21(1), 248–372. https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.21.1.2022.3823

Dodds, D. (2021). The psychology of climate anxiety. BJPsych Bull, 45(4), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1192%2Fbjb.2021.18

Estok, S. C. (2011). Ecocriticism and Shakespeare: Reading ecophobia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Estok, S. C. (2018). The Ecophobia Hypothesis. New York, NY: Routledge.

Estok, S. C. (2009). Theorizing in a space of ambivalent openness: Ecocriticism and ecophobia. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 16(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isp010

Eyita-Okon, E. (2022). Urbanization and human security in post-colonial Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.917764

Faber, D. (1992). The ecological crisis of Latin America: A theoretical introduction. Latin American Perspectives, 19(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X9201900101

Fasseur, C. (1986). The cultivation system and its impact on the Dutch colonial economy and the indigenous society in nineteenth-century Java. In C. A. Bayly & D. H. A. Kolff (Eds.), Two colonial empires: Comparative studies in overseas history (pp. 137–154). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.

Feenberg, A.-M. (1997). Max Havelaar: An anti-imperialist novel. MLN, 112(5), 817–835.

Fisher, M. (2006). Counterflows to colonialism: Indian travellers and settlers in Britain 1600–1857. Delhi, India: Permanent Black.

Foster, J. B., & Clark, B. (2004). Ecological imperialism: The curse of capitalism. Socialist Register, 40, 186–201.

Frame, M. L. (2022). Ecological imperialism, development, and the capitalist world system: Cases from Africa and Asia. London, UK: Routledge.

Griffiths, T. (2017). The transformative craft of environmental history: Perspectives on Australian scholarship. RCC Perspectives, 2, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.5282/rcc/7915

Guha, S. (1999). Environment and ethnicity in India, 1200–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Indriyanto, K. (2023). Positioning Agrarianism as a Sustainable Environmental Discourse: Culture, Nature and Place. Ecocycles, 9(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v9i2.314

Izzah, L., Sulistiyono, S. T., & Birnie, D. (2020). A Dutch private investor and agent of social change for society at Bondowoso East Java, Indonesia in the colonial era. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485, 1–8.

Kerridge, R. (1998). Introduction. In R. Kerridge & N. Sammells (Eds.), Writing the environment: Ecocriticism and literature. London: Zed Books.

Kroeze, R. (2021). Colonial normativity? Corruption in the Dutch–Indonesian relationship in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In R. Kroeze, P. Dalmau, & F. Monier (Eds.), Corruption, empire and colonialism in the modern era (pp. 173–208). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kurth, C., & Pihkala, P. (2022). Eco-anxiety: What is it and why it matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.981814

Lacan, J. (2016). Anxiety: The seminar of Jacques Lacan (Book X ed.; J.-A. Miller, Ed.; A. R. Price, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Leonard, Z. (2023). Panic, False News, and the Roots of Colonial Fear. Journal of British Studies, 62(3), 713–738. https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2023.3

Levy, N. (1999). Foucault’s unnatural ecology. In E. Darier (Ed.), Discourses of the environment (pp. 202–216). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Maddox, G. (2018). Africa and environmental history. Environmental History, 4(2), 162–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119063551.ch15

McNeill, J. R. (2013). Radkau on the Americas. Social Science History, 37(3), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1215/01455532-2209438

Memmi, A. (2021). The colonizer and the colonized. London, UK: Profile Books.

Multatuli. (1860). Max Havelaar (A. Nahuÿs, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: Edmonston & Douglas.

Oppermann, S. (2007). Ecological imperialism in British colonial fiction. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Letters, 24(1), 179–194.

O’Riordan, T. (2007). Faces of the sustainability transition. In J. Pretty, A. Ball, T. Benton, J. Guivant, D. R. Lee, D. Orr,… & H. Ward (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of environment and society (pp. 325–335). London, UK: SAGE Publications.

Palacio, G. (2012). An eco-political vision for an environmental history: Toward a Latin American and North American research partnership. Environmental History, 17(4), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/ems081

Palmer, W. (2022). Ordinary Violence, Emotion, Information, and Anxiety. Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques, 48(3), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.3167/hrrh.2022.030822

Pawson, E. (2017). Ecological imperialism. In D. Richardson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0681

Pereira, T., & Freire, T. (2021). Positive youth development in the context of climate change: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786119

Rizal, J. (2006). Noli me tangere (H. Augenbraum, Trans.). New York: Penguin.

Rothman, H. (2002). Conceptualizing the real: Environmental history and American studies. American Quarterly, 54(2), 485–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2002.0031

Ryan, J. C. (2020). “The pained and silent song of a branch”: Ecological precarity in the poetry of Taufiq Ismail and Khairani Barokka. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 56(4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2020.1762832

Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

Silver, T. (2007). Learning to live with nature: Colonial historians and the southern environment. Journal of Southern History, 73(3), 539–552.

Swami, V. (2003). Environmental history and British colonialism in India: A prime political agenda. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 113–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0011

Tandayu, L. & Wijanarka, H. (2023). The Interrelations of Nature and Woman in Takahata's The Tale of The Princess Kaguya: An Ecofeminist Perspective. Journal of Language and Literature, 23(1), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v23i1.5863

Teggin, E. O. (2020). Colonial anxiety and identity: Ethnic networks as cultural supports in colonial South Asia and Sumatra. Indonesian Historical Studies, 4(2), 84–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/ihis.v4i2.8891

Teggin, E. O. (2022). Space and Anxiety in the Colonial Novel: The Concepts of Sanctuary and Confinement in Burmese Days, Max Havelaar, Kim and Midnight’s Children. Scientia - The International Journal on the Liberal Arts, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v11i1.7

Thakur, G. B. (2012). Reading Bhabha, reading Lacan: Preliminary notes on colonial anxiety. In S. Biswas (Ed.), The literary Lacan: From literature to “lituraterre” and beyond (pp. 242–258) Kolkata, India: Seagull Books.

Zook, D. C. (2006). Searching for Max Havelaar: Multatuli, colonial history, and the confusion of empire. MLN, 121(5), 1169–1189. https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2007.0021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.8282