Perlocutionary Speech Act of Conveying Bad News in Medical Communication
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Conveying bad news in the medical field, can present a challenging scenario as it tends to evoke emotional responses such as sadness, anxiety, and anger in the recipients. Essentially, this communication scenario holds the potential to impact the recipient, aligning with the concept of perlocutionary speech acts. Research into perlocutionary speech acts in the context of delivering adverse news within medical communication has not been extensively explored. This study aims to provide an overview of perlocutionary speech acts observed in delivering bad news within a medical context, as depicted in The Resident series. Employing a qualitative research design, this study applied a pragmatic approach for data analysis. The dataset for this study comprises the dialogues of doctors in 11 distinct contexts involving the communication of bad news in The Resident series. The results of the study showed that perlocutionary speech acts appeared in the context of delivering bad news, including the act of asking for confirmation, calming, explaining, informing, suggesting, and convincing. Additionally, these speech acts incite various emotional responses in the recipients, including sadness, anger, self-blame, panic, surprise, and calm. The outcomes of this research serve as a valuable reference for enhancing communication skills and pragmatic competence among healthcare professionals when confronted with the task of conveying bad news.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, D. A., & Klein, S. (2000). Bad news is bad news: let's not make it worse. Trauma, 2(1), 11-18.
Anderson, R. J., Bloch, S., Armstrong, M., Stone, P. C., & Low, J. T. (2019). Communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Palliative Medicine, 33(8), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319852007
Černý, M. (2007 ). On the Function of Speech Acts in Doctor-Patient Communication. Linguistica, 1-15.
Czerwionka, L. (2012). Mitigation: The combined effects of imposition and certitude. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1163-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.002
Curtis, K., Tzannes, A., & Rudge, T. (2011). How to talk to doctors–a guide for effective communication. International nursing review, 58(1), 13-20.
Deledda, G., Moretti, F., Rimondini, M., & Zimmermann, C. (2013). How patients want their doctor to communicate. A literature review on primary care patients’ perspective. Patient Education and Counseling, 90(3), 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.005
Glaser, K. (2009). Acquiring pragmatic competence in a foreign language–mastering dispreferred speech acts. Topics in Linguistics, 1(4), 50-57.
Hayugraha, A. W., Nababan, M. R., & Marmanto, S. (2019). Speech Acts Found in the Movie “The Good Doctor”. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(5), 840-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1150
Hidayat, A. (2016). Speech acts: Force behind words. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 9(1), 1-12.
Jansen, F., & Janssen, D. (2011). Explanations First: A Case for Presenting Explanations Before the Decision in Dutch Bad-News Messages. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910380372
Kissine, M. (2012). Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00093.x
Laranjeira, C., Afonso, C., & Querido, A. I. (2021). Communicating Bad News: Using Role-Play to Teach Nursing Student. Mental Health in Palliative Care Nursing – Practice Updates, 7, 1-5.
Liu, Y., Zhang, S., & Zhu, L. (2015). Analysis the Positive Role of Speech Act Theory in Promoting the Oral English Skills of Doctor-patient Communication. Chinese Medical Ethics, 5, 734-736.
Martínez-Flor, A. (2005). A Theoretical Review of the Speech Act of Suggesting: Towards a Taxonomy for its Use in FLT. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingles, 18, 167-187.
McCutcheon, K., O’Halloran, P., & Lohan, M. (2018). Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. International journal of nursing studies, 82, 30-39.
Moore, P. M., Rivera, S., Bravo‐Soto, G. A., Olivares, C., & Lawrie, T. A. (2018). Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7).
Ohtaki, S., Ohtaki, T., & Fetters. M. D. (2003). Doctor–patient communication: a comparison of the USA and Japan. Family Practice, 20(3), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmg308
Quick, B. L. (2009). The Effects of Viewing Grey's Anatomy on Perceptions of Doctors and Patient Satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802643563
Rayan, A., Hussni Al-Ghabeesh, S., & Qarallah, I. (2022). Critical Care Nurses’ Attitudes, Roles, and Barriers Regarding Breaking Bad News. SAGE Open Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221089999
Rett, J. (2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and philosophy, 34, 411-442.
Riedl, D., & Schüßler, G. (2017). The influence of doctor-patient communication on health outcomes: a systematic review. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 63(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2017.63.2.131
Salgado, E. F. (2011). The pragmatics of requests and apologies: Developmental patterns of Mexican students (Vol. 212). John Benjamins Publishing.
Seferoğlu, G. (2008). Using feature films in language classes. Educational studies, 34(1), 1-9.
Siemund, P. (2018). Speech acts and clause types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press.
Skelton, J. R., Murray, J., Hobbs, F. D. R. (1999). Imprecision in Medical Communication: Study of a Doctor Talking to Patients with Serious Illness. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 92, 620-625.
Slotta, J. (2015). The perlocutionary is political: Listening as self-determination in a Papua New Guinean polity. Language in society, 44(4), 525-552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000421
Thoms, C., Degenhart, A., & Wohlgemuth, K. (2020). Is Bad News Difficult to Read? A Readability Analysis of Differently Connoted Passages in the Annual Reports of the 30 DAX Companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(2), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919892312
Wallace, B. C., T. A. Trikalinos, M. B. Laws, I. B. Wilson, and E. Charniak. "A Generative Joint, Additive, Sequential Model of Topics and Speech Acts in Patient-Doctor Communication." Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013. 1765-1775.
Zaefferer, D. (2001). Deconstructing a classical classification: A typological look at Searle's concept of illocution type. Revue internationale de philosophie, (02), 209-225.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i1.7122
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
JOLL is indexed in:
This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License