Reification of Bourgeois Ideology in Bhattarai’s Muglan
(1) Tribhuwan University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper aims to explore how innocent Nepali youths reify the elitist bourgeois ideology of the Nepalese society that forces them to go to Muglan, a term, denoting foreign country for Nepali people, and confront unexpected blows there in Govinda Raj Bhattarai’s novel, Muglan. Reification signifies the ideology and perception of people residing in a capitalist society. The study of the impact of reification demonstrates the reality of a society. Bhattarai is critical to the way Sutar Kanchha, the protagonist of the novel, obsessed with the dominant capitalist ideology, goes to Bhutan to earn. But he gets robbed there and he is forced to do tough physical labor like an animal. To survey terrific effects of the dominant capitalist ideology of the Nepalese society over the life of the poor Nepali people, the research paper applies neo-Marxist insights, with special focus on Louis Althusser and Antonio Gramsci. The chief finding is that Bhattarai is critical to persisting capitalist ideology of the Nepalese society that forces innocent Nepali youths to leave their country just for survival. But, in turn, they get robbed and are compelled to work like slaves in the cruel Muglan. It is expected that researchers intending to explore on Nepali literature from the neo-Marxist perspective will find the paper a useful reference.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2005). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. In B. Pandey (Ed.), Intellectual history reader (pp. 145-150). Kathmandu: M. K. Publishers.
Althusser, L. (1999). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 45-51). London: Verso.
Atam, N., & Baral, K. H. (1999). Upanyas siddhanth ra Nepali upanyas [Novel principles and Nepali novels]. Kathmandu: Sajha Prakashan.
Belsey, C. (2005). Textual analysis as a research method. In G. Gabriele (Ed.), Research methods for English studies (pp. 167-170). Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press.
Bhattarai, G. R. (2012). Muglan (L.S. Pathak, Trans.). Kathmandu: Oriental Publication.
Blackledge, P. &, Anderson, P. (2004). Marxism, and the new left. Dublin: Merlin Press.
Govinda Raj Bhattarai (n. d.) Gyaanipedia.com. https://en.gyaanipedia.com/wiki/Govinda_Raj_Bhattarai
Bista, D. B. (2008). Fatalism and development. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
Criticism is a parasitic plant (2020 November 27). The Gorkha Times https://thegorkhatimes.com/2020/11/27/criticism-is-a-parasitic-plant/
Gramsci, A. (1994). Selections from the prison notebook. New York: Columbia University Press.
Honneth, A. (2005). Reification: A recognition-theoretical view. The tanner lectures on human values. California: University of California Berkeley.https://www.google.com/search?q=Reification%3A+a+recognition-Theoretical+view%3A+The+Tanner+Lectures+on+Human+Values&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b
Hutt, M. (1998). Going to Muglan: Nepali literary representation of migration to India and Bhutan. South Asia Research, 18(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/026272809801800205
Koirala, K. P. (2011). Introduction. In G. R. Bhattarai, Muglan (5th Ed.). Kathmandu: Oriental Publication.
Lukacs, G. (1971). Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat. History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Dublin: Merlin Press. (Original work published 1923)
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1994). The communist manifesto. New York: International Publishers.
Mehmood, S. (2018, May 5). Reification in revolution 2020. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(5), 43-52.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n5p43
Mishra, C. (2014, (June 1o). Nepal and capitalism. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/opinion/2014/06/10/nepal-and-capitalism
Mishra, I. A. (2021). Representation of masculinity in Govinda Raj Bhattarai's Muglan. JODEM, 12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.3126/jodem.v12i1.38716
Neupane, N. (2021, June 15). Translating across languages and cultures: A study of culture-specific terms in Bhattarai’s Muglan. Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation, Special Issue,57-70. http://ejournals.pncampus.edu.np/ejournals/pjri/
Pitkin, H. F. (1987). Rethinking reification. Theory and Society, 2(16), 263-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135697
Postone, M. (2003). Lukacs and the dialectical critique of capitalism. New dialectics and political Economy. Stuttgart: Macmillan Press. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057%2F9780230500914_5
Subedi, K. P. (2014). Readers’ perception on mixing code: A case of novel. MA Thesis. Tribhuvan University. Kathmandu.
https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/handle/123456789/1800
Subedi, R. (2007). Nepali upanyasa: Parampara ra prabriti. [Nepali novel: Tradition and trend] (3rd Ed.). Kathmandu: Sajha.
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today. New York: Routledge, 125.
Walker, D., & Gray, D. (2007). Historical dictionary of Marxism. Lanham: The Scarecrow.
Zizek, S. (1999). Mapping ideology. London: Verso.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4840
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Language and Literature (JOLL) is published by Prodi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
JOLL is indexed in:
This journal is is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License